Week 3: Denver Broncos @ Oakland Raiders

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Raiders or Donkeys?

  • Raiders

    Votes: 41 60.3%
  • Donkeys

    Votes: 27 39.7%

  • Total voters
    68
Apr 7, 2005
13,696
159
63
52
www.myspace.com
if cassel still had gonzales to throw too, we might have lost that game.

that game was back and forth like a cameo song, and whoever had ball at the end was gonna win.....just like all the games we play at arrowhead (see LJs 4th & goal TD a couple of years back and plus last years game)

chiefs were able to move the ball on us by mixing up the play calls and their O line played really good. if not for huff's 2 picks, those might have very well been some drives the chiefs could have scored on.

that game we played standard raider football, barely enough to win, and tons of penalties. of course they were offsides calls because of crowd noise, but they came at piviotal times in the middlel of some really good drives....sheesh, thats what silent count is for fellas!

perhaps being at home was a difference in how the raiders played....we will see against the donks
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
fuck you, your mom and your grandpa!!

RAIDER NATION MANE!!

FUCK THEM DONKEYS!!

kyle orton's face looks like '70s porn pussy, and probably seen as much nutt!!

fatal....I hope your red rag gets washed with your white laundry and you gotta rock pink tees around gridley, you bastard

where's fairy_1 at??

if my little ponies win, i will rock that unicorn logo in my sig and avi until we meet again 12/20/09

which one of you is gonna do the same?





pollo_loco - I mean no disrespect. I meant fuck you in the nicest way possible

im here! been out sick as well as getting haunted houses up and ready for next weeks openings!


I got you, I'll take that bet! fuck it.

this game can go either way. If our d shows up like it has there is no way in hell JR does anything against us and he throws like 3 picks game over.

Buuuuuut Orton is due for a couple picks as well.

We need Marshall to get his head out of his ass for this game. We need Royal to start running right routes for this game, and we need the runing game to improve yet again for this game.

make my score 24-17 denver!
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
go buy a box of tissue. you guys are a real bad football team, bottomline. we got the W, and any way you cut it, that is all that matters.

good teams find ways to win when they are clearly out played.
so you are saying the Raiders are a good team just because they squeaked out a win against a socalled "bad team"? that don't make any sense now does it?

its funny how you guys give credit to the Raiders for playing well against a "better team" in the Chargers in week 1 that they still end up losing to AND then turn around and NOT give credit to the Chiefs for doinig the exact samething against your team the following week!

bunch of fuckin' hypocrites!
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
isnt a fact until the games are played


the dolphins went from 1-15 to the playoffs 11-5.

i dont go off generalizations, i predict the future and bet on it. and i'm successful at it.

"everybody" generalized the jets as a terrible team coming into this season, yet they're 2-0 and just beat the patriots.

"everybody" generalized the packers as an elite team, yet the bengals just beat them in green bay.

the titans are 0-2 when they started the season 10-0 last year.


you 2 can assume your teams are shit, good for you, i dont care. i often disagree with "experts" on tv too, and am more often correct than them.

i need more games to fully judge what this raiders team is currently. we've played 2 very different games and while JR has been the biggest weakness and the worst QB in the nfl, he did manage to put a drive together when it counted in both games.

its the raiders coaching i havent figured out yet, a lot of analysts and players like cable but i havent heard much about any of the assistants and its always been foggy trying to decipher who is really in control, coaches or mr d.

i do feel like this team has the potential to the be the best raider team since 2002, i bet on the raiders to beat the chargers straight up, no 10 point spread. and we nearly did. and this is why i still say we played down to the chiefs even tho they "overachieved" or "played hard" or whatever else a chiefs fan would want to call it. we got outplayed because we played down. had we played up to our potential it would not have been close. done.

the week is over, period. time to talk about the broncos. chiefs fans go talk to yourselves about whoever you play because we dont care until you lose and we can laugh at you more.
got outplayed because you played down to us? what? what the fuck does that even mean? god... you gotta be one of the most ignorant raider fans on this board.

your passing game was shit, your running game was shit, your running defense was shit and your passing defense was shit that game. HOW THE FUCK DOES THE CHIEFS TEAM GET NO CREDIT FOR THAT IN YOUR EYES? in your opinion it was all because the Raiders didn't play up to their "potential"? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE WITH THAT SHIT! Thats just you being a homer which most of us are and some others are more Homeristic like yourself.

You are just someone who can't give credit where the credit is due just because your hatred for that team clouds your MO RONic judgement! Its clear as day.
 
Nov 7, 2002
1,155
111
0
Man sudays game is way up in the air with the way our offense has been playing. We lost Gallery to a broken leg, Cornell Green jumps offsides like 5 times a game, we have not run the ball like we should be in both of the last games, and JR stares down recievers and still over throws them all day. So I think it will be a low scoring game very hard hitting but low scoring 17 - 13 Raiders.
 
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
44
got outplayed because you played down to us? what? what the fuck does that even mean? god... you gotta be one of the most ignorant raider fans on this board.

your passing game was shit, your running game was shit, your running defense was shit and your passing defense was shit that game. HOW THE FUCK DOES THE CHIEFS TEAM GET NO CREDIT FOR THAT IN YOUR EYES? in your opinion it was all because the Raiders didn't play up to their "potential"? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE WITH THAT SHIT! Thats just you being a homer which most of us are and some others are more Homeristic like yourself.

You are just someone who can't give credit where the credit is due just because your hatred for that team clouds your MO RONic judgement! Its clear as day.

UMM.. PLEASE HELP ME OUT HERE, JAMIE. WHAT EXACTLY IS IT THAT YOU WANT CREDIT FOR? HAVING A BUNCH OF YARDS ON OFFENSE? - YOU LOST THE FUCKING GAME!!!

OUR PASSING DEFENSE WAS SHIT? OUR PASSING DEFENSE PRACTICALLY WON US THE GAME. HUFF HAD 2 PICKS. I DON'T GIVE A FUCK IF TEAMS PUT UP 1,000 YARDS OF OFFENSE ON US, AS LONG AS WE MAKE THE PLAYS THAT IMPACT THE GAME, (WHICH IS WAS WE DID.) STATS ARE FOR FANTASY FOOTBALL. THIS GAME IS ABOUT WINS AND LOSSES.

OUR PASSING OFFENSE WAS SHIT? STATISTICALLY YES, I WILL AGREE. BUT REMEMBER: JAMARCUS HAD A CLUTCH DRIVE WITH BEAUTIFUL THROWS THAT WON THE GAME. THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A MOMENT.

ON TOP OF ALL THIS LOSER CRY-BABY TALK FROM YOU, NOT ONE POST CONGRADULATING US FOR GUTTING OUT THE WIN.

TALK ABOUT NOT GIVING CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE. FUCKING BITCH ASS QUEEFS.
 

VanD

Sicc OG
Feb 8, 2004
5,934
40
0
39
reading comprehension failure = ArGenTin3
the week is over, period. time to talk about the broncos. chiefs fans go talk to yourselves about whoever you play because we dont care until you lose and we can laugh at you more.
^^^^^^^^^^^^


Yeah right with his arm strength and accuracy he would stay hitting fans on the 2nd deck seats through out the game haha
ya probably but i was jus throwin shit out there about his non athletic ability. but a baseball is different than a football and in pitching the target isnt moving. so maybe but it was just shit talk anyways.
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
UMM.. PLEASE HELP ME OUT HERE, JAMIE. WHAT EXACTLY IS IT THAT YOU WANT CREDIT FOR? HAVING A BUNCH OF YARDS ON OFFENSE? - YOU LOST THE FUCKING GAME!!!

OUR PASSING DEFENSE WAS SHIT? OUR PASSING DEFENSE PRACTICALLY WON US THE GAME. HUFF HAD 2 PICKS. I DON'T GIVE A FUCK IF TEAMS PUT UP 1,000 YARDS OF OFFENSE ON US, AS LONG AS WE MAKE THE PLAYS THAT IMPACT THE GAME, (WHICH IS WAS WE DID.) STATS ARE FOR FANTASY FOOTBALL. THIS GAME IS ABOUT WINS AND LOSSES.

OUR PASSING OFFENSE WAS SHIT? STATISTICALLY YES, I WILL AGREE. BUT REMEMBER: JAMARCUS HAD A CLUTCH DRIVE WITH BEAUTIFUL THROWS THAT WON THE GAME. THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A MOMENT.

ON TOP OF ALL THIS LOSER CRY-BABY TALK FROM YOU, NOT ONE POST CONGRADULATING US FOR GUTTING OUT THE WIN.

TALK ABOUT NOT GIVING CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE. FUCKING BITCH ASS QUEEFS.
no shit you won the game sherlock! where am i fuckin' cryin' about this game? i've done admitted defeat in all my posts after it was over. you have obviously not seen some of my initial posts WHERE I DO CONGRATULATE THE RAIDERS FOR THE WIN! Its not my fault your dumb ass hasn't read them yet.

my beef is with you homer ass fans...ones like you who act as if your squad is some kind of fuckin' division contender all of a sudden after SQUEAKING A WIN OUT AGAINST US. Ya'll did not look good at all in that entire game up until the final drive when we emploded Raiders style on you for some reason. We might have not won the game, true! but....all indications from that game were that ya'll still ain't as fuckin' good as you make yourselves out to be!

You are easily one of the biggest homers on this entire site right behind Chreepy and it shows when you can't even acknowledge that you guys were EXTREMELY lucky to come out of KC with that win!

Im done debating this with you guys because ya'll have put those Raider shades back on and think that you're some kinda fuckin' contenders after that lackluster of a game ya'll had against us. I guess when you have an NFL record 6 straight 10+ loss seasons that will do that to you...anything is hope with you guys, not that there is anything wrong with that...lol

Raiders just made the plays at the end of the game like you said and pulled the win out, while we made alot of plays during the game but couldn't put the nail in the coffin. Thats the Chiefs fault.

You're still a bitch though Sally, all other Raider fans on here are alright in my book. You on the other hand can eat a dick and choke on nut sack skin for all i care.

Go Raiders! Beat them lucky fuckin' Broncos! :cool:
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
so you are saying the Raiders are a good team just because they squeaked out a win against a socalled "bad team"? that don't make any sense now does it?
what i'm saying is in order for the raiders to become a good team they need to win games like this. teams sometimes tend to play down to their opponents. a win is a win in the w-l column. how you win doesnt matter.

as a life long raider fan that has been very dissapointed the last 6 or so years, i cant remember the last time we won a game in this fashion.(comeback)

as bad as russell has looked, the kid is doing things these last two weeks no raider QB was able to do since rich gannon. not that we have had quality guys at the position. I understand the frustration because i too am frustrated by JR's play. but he does show signs of being exceptional in this league. hopefully he starts putting it together.
 

VanD

Sicc OG
Feb 8, 2004
5,934
40
0
39
it says alot about his ability to overcome. that is all i'm saying.

we havent came back in in the closing minutes like that in AWHILE.

can you remember the last time?

i kno what ur saying, i just took apart the rich gannon comparison.

normally its the opposite, where we have the lead and then lose it in the 4th.

when kiffin was head coach we had the lead going into the 4th quarter of 75% of the games he coached. our prob then was an inept defensive coordinator that switched our scheme into a retarded prevent in the 4th that got picked apart every time by opposing qb's.


anyways, its def a quality to step up when it counts the most on the final drives but if he was even 20% more accurate we probably wouldnt even be in that final drive situation.