Week 1 9/13/09 - 49ERS @ CARDINALS THREAD

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who will win?


  • Total voters
    52
  • Poll closed .
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
Why not? Because they have two great receivers...and what else?

Seattle has a better QB, who is also younger.

The RB's could be seen as equal, especially with Wells out.

Cards have a better WR corp, but ares aint nothing to scoff at, Nate is looking fantastic, TJ is better than expected and Deion Butler is looking promising.

John carlson is a STUD at TE.

Our OL's are about even.

So why dont you tell me exactly where AZ is leaps & bounds above Seattle?
I can agree the RBs can be seen as equal, same with the O-Line. But Kurt Warner >>>>>> Matt Hasselbeck. There's no way you can argue that you have a better QB. And the WRs are FAR better than yours.

Better QB and better WRs, while everything else is a push = better offense. Get it?
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
I can agree the RBs can be seen as equal, same with the O-Line. But Kurt Warner >>>>>> Matt Hasselbeck. There's no way you can argue that you have a better QB. And the WRs are FAR better than yours.

Better QB and better WRs, while everything else is a push = better offense. Get it?
No mention of the TE? How convenient.

Kurt Warner FAR better than Matt???? Wow. Maybe 7 years ago. And i mean, lets look PAST the fact that He has had some of the BEST pairs of WR in history, with Bruce/Holt, and now Fitz/Boldin. When has Matt had the luxury?

Should we compare career stats?
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
No mention of the TE? How convenient.
Yeah, because a guy that's worth 600 yards is such a huge advantage for your offense. The Cardinals 4TH receiver is only under 200 yards and 1 TD away from tying your TEs numbers.

I Pukokeki Ioulo Momu said:
Kurt Warner FAR better than Matt???? Wow. Maybe 7 years ago.
You must not have watched football last season.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
john carlson is good though, and will be good
I agree, but the Cardinals WRs are so far ahead of the Seahawks that his contribution isn't going to help dude's argument that the Seahawks offense is better than the Cardinals'. I didn't feel the need to bring up the TEs because the Cards rarely even use them anyway.

A better TE doesn't offset the fact that your team's receivers are nowhere near as good as the other team's, and your QB isn't as good as theirs either.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
Yeah, because a guy that's worth 600 yards is such a huge advantage for your offense. The Cardinals 4TH receiver is only under 200 yards and 1 TD away from tying your TEs numbers.

How many TE's have 1000 yard seasons? And Carlson has played ONE year. On top of that, are you saying that TE's are basically worthless? LOL...please enlighten me on your brilliant take on this position. Thanks.

And that is what happens when your offense cant run the ball like the Cards. LOL...what do you expect when you throw for over 4000 yards? Simple math.


You must not have watched football last season.
So one great year after a good year and 3 medicore years, means he is super awesome? He can thank Fitz and Boldin for that. I hope he buys them dinner every night, becuase without them, who knows how good or bad he is.
 

Rich

Sicc OG
Jul 22, 2003
6,700
0
0
43
We've actually done pretty well with holding Fitz in check for the most part.


Our last 4 games (home and away) were always pretty close. I think our new offensive approach will allow us to wear down their defense and keep their potent offense off the field.

Niners 20
Cardinals 17
Wow close