Vick: we were all wrong

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#41
Vick's a piece of shit. I don't give a fuck what he does on a football field..

"Many people will never get over Vick's own admissions of unthinkable cruelty to his pit bulls — the strangling, the drowning, the electrocutions, the removal of all the teeth of female dogs who would fight back during mating."

Source: http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-plaschke-20101117,0,5163298.column?page=1&track=rss
thats cool and i know a lot of people dont like what happened to the dogs but i dont give a fuck what he does OFF the field. he could snatch purses from old ladies and rob santa at the mall while hes ringin a fucking bell panhandling for change for all i give a fuck. just like LT or ray lewis i really dont give a shit what they do thats theyre business.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#42
i wouldnt stop from going back and watching braveheart just because mel gibson is a fucking faggot and a dbag off the screen. same thing with sports who gives a chit.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#43
he got rail roaded. fucker did time over dogs. completely unnecessary and a result of the media's lynching. i have three dogs, so i lub them, but he was thrown under the bus on this one.
This is a contradicting sentence.

If you are a dog owner, you should be irate over what Vick did. Period. Thats like not being mad at Sicx for what he did if you have a child. No, dogs are NOT humans, but they are LIVING creatures with personality, emotions, feelings, and intelligence. Just because they cant talk to you in English, doesn't mean they are worthless animals.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#44
i wouldnt stop from going back and watching braveheart just because mel gibson is a fucking faggot and a dbag off the screen. same thing with sports who gives a chit.
I think people have a more emotional attachment to sports figures than actors, as demonstrated by Cavalier fans, so this analogy may be unfair. Also, Vick isn't pretending to be someone else for 2 hours...Mel is. Vick is Vick no matter what.
 
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
#45
Don't agree with the way he treated his dogs

but i also realize he's human and fucks up like every other person walking this earth

we live in a fucked up society, but that doesn't give people the right to throw stones when they live in glass houses
 
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
#47
So you're saying that anyone who criticizes Vick for what he did, has also tortured and killed dogs?

yes everyone one of them lol

i was talking about the bigger picture that everyone has faults, not everyone works to correct their problems yet they like to talk about other people's mistakes.
 

Stealth

Join date: May '98
May 8, 2002
7,137
1,177
113
40
#51
If you are a dog owner, you should be irate over what Vick did. Period. Thats like not being mad at Sicx for what he did if you have a child. No, dogs are NOT humans, but they are LIVING creatures with personality, emotions, feelings, and intelligence. Just because they cant talk to you in English, doesn't mean they are worthless animals.
What Vick did to his dogs isn't even in the same universe as what Sicx did to his kid...
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#52
What Vick did to his dogs isn't even in the same universe as what Sicx did to his kid...
Youre right, because Sicx' kids have to live their lives knowing what their father AND mother did to them, and are psychologically fucked forever. At least the dogs died and no longer have to live with the pain Vick inflicted on them.

However, both acts were inhumane and disgusting. Period.
 

:ab:

blunt_hogg559
Jul 6, 2005
8,149
5,192
0
#53
This is a contradicting sentence.

If you are a dog owner, you should be irate over what Vick did. Period. Thats like not being mad at Sicx for what he did if you have a child. No, dogs are NOT humans, but they are LIVING creatures with personality, emotions, feelings, and intelligence. Just because they cant talk to you in English, doesn't mean they are worthless animals.
nothing contradictory at all. i got pet dogs, so i got love for them. but i place humans and their well being above dogs.
 

DUTCH-F.E

Super Moderator
Apr 25, 2002
7,029
8,094
113
43
WWW.myspace.com
#55
i think vick is a beast in every sense of the word. He reminds me of a demon when i look at him. so i stay clear of the guy.... BUT... i own him on 2 of my fantasy teams and the guy is a freak!!!!!! so yeah.. he is who i thought he was!!!!!!
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#58
I think people have a more emotional attachment to sports figures than actors, as demonstrated by Cavalier fans, so this analogy may be unfair. Also, Vick isn't pretending to be someone else for 2 hours...Mel is. Vick is Vick no matter what.
if people want that deep emotional attachment thats on them. vick is vick til he steps on the field. then hes a member of a cast of characters performing on a stage for millions of people. i dont see the difference between him and mel gibson. just because mel fakes what hes doing hes still getting paid to entertain people. i dont think what theyre doing for those 2 or 3 hours entertaining people matters in the grand scheme of things. why is it easier to ignore one entertainer over another?
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#59
not in the first half of the season for the cowboys they couldnt block for shit with wade as HC but with garrett as HC they did a lot better last week
phillys oline isnt great either. i said it before the season and was laughed at for suggesting the cowboys would be better with vick than romo. i stand by that. no vick team would ever go 1-7. jones actually tried to sign him last year before the eagles came with the better offer. i know hes kicking himself for lowballing him now.