I wasn't impressed with the speech.
While others sat in class and doodled to later become great artists, I sat in class to take notes and become a great test-taker.
I think this is a fantasy that most people believe of artists. They just have some natural talent and BOOM they go on to be great artists. Becoming a great artist usually takes just as much discipline as becoming a great "test-taker."
Usually artists go to art schools to further hone their talents.
While others would come to class without their homework done because they were reading about an interest of theirs, I never missed an assignment.
Most of the time I didn't do my homework it was because I was out partying or wasting time. I don't see how being a good student and engaging in a personal interest is incompatible.
I have no clue about what I want to do with my life; I have no interests because I saw every subject of study as work, and I excelled at every subject just for the purpose of excelling, not learning. And quite frankly, now I'm scared.
If she has no interests, absolutely none, maybe it's also a flaw in her character, and how she was parented. I mean, most people I know who DID do well in school, usually had some goals in mind, and it wasn't always a business major. They also had many interests.
I personally didn't do well in school, but I don't blame the public school system. It seems we live in a culture that takes free education for granted. When we don't have it we bitch about it, but when we have it for years, we don't take it seriously. I've been to schools in relatively good areas, and schools in poor areas, and they all had some kind of outlets for students. There were usually after school programs, clubs, contests, all kinds of things going on, that most students didn't take advantage of.
I think the bigger problem in our society is materialism and the sense of entitlement and I don't think that it's a direct result of our schooling.