ufc 86 jackson vs griffin predictions

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
Honestly it could have gone either way and I agree with Stomper that you have to convincingly beat the champ, and in that respect maybe Rampage should have retained his belt. But as it stands I don't think any injustice was done. I think point-wise Forrest scored more but there is no use arguing about it.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
what idiot can sit there and say griffin was more aggressive. get the fuck out of here. how the fuck do you duck and dodge a guy thats on one leg for 3 rounds? AND WIN?
 
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
lol

sports are fixed

this was on purpose so they will have to fight again, and so ufc can have a belt holder come from the show.
 

BAMMER

Siccness Gray Hair
Apr 25, 2002
5,828
479
83
47
Auburn Wa
www.dawgman.com
NOW I KNOW THIS ISNT BOXING BUT I THOUGHT IT WAS UNIVERSALLY WELL KNOWN, THAT YOU HAVE TO DOMINATE THE CHAMP TO WIN A DECISION OVER HIM.
That's a myth,like "tie goes to the runner"(baseball).I did'nt get to see the fight yet,but why hold any kind of competition when your giving one of them a leg up by sayin,you can't just win,you have to even do a little more.kinda bullshit to me.