THE OFFICIAL OAKLAND RAIDERS 2009 OFFSEASON THREAD

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#61
Chree... your blatant hatred for the Oakland Raiders is preventing you from being realistic... just stop it

are you telling me if the Raiders come out and play like they did the past 2 games of the season they're only gonna win 2 games?
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,363
13,862
113
39
#62
lol thats only 2 games of the year, look at the rest of the year, obviously the coaching staff wont remain the same, but really look at that schedule......

are the raiders gonna come out and play like the 1st 2 weeks or last 2 weeks?
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#63
Denver, KC (at least one... home or road games) Cinci, Washington, and NY Jets all at home are winnable

the road schedule is tougher for sure.... Cleveland and Houston are winnable

I see 9 games that are winnable... not saying we will win all 9... but to say we'll win 2 is flat out hating... and you know it
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#64
lol thats only 2 games of the year, look at the rest of the year, obviously the coaching staff wont remain the same, but really look at that schedule......

are the raiders gonna come out and play like the 1st 2 weeks or last 2 weeks?
what do you mean by the first 2 weeks?

just for the record we scraped KC in their house week 2

you obviously don't know what you're talking about... I suggest you stop typing now
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#66
I know they beat the chiefs fool, thats my point, u dont know how they gonna come out
you said... are we gonna play like the last 2 weeks OR like the first 2 weeks

basically sounded like you were implying we played good the first 2 weeks and like shit the last 2 weeks...

and is it not logical to assume that winning 2 games in a row against solid opponents to end the season means we're improving???

obviously we don't know who the coaches are gonna be... who we're gonna draft... pick up in FA... which makes the whole argument kind of pointless anyways...

but to assume we'll win 2 games is just hating... if you would even say 4 I could see your point... but come on...

J. Russ obviously improved (still has a ong way to go) and he'll probably improve more... our WR's came out and showed us something towards the end of the year

we'll have a healthy Mcfadden... we finally know what Michael Bush can do... hopefully we'll strengthen the O and D lines

fact is we've been slowly improving since the horrible Art Shell season... I see that improvement continuing... slowly... but still better
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,363
13,862
113
39
#67
you said... are we gonna play like the last 2 weeks OR like the first 2 weeks

basically sounded like you were implying we played good the first 2 weeks and like shit the last 2 weeks...

and is it not logical to assume that winning 2 games in a row against solid opponents to end the season means we're improving???

obviously we don't know who the coaches are gonna be... who we're gonna draft... pick up in FA... which makes the whole argument kind of pointless anyways...

but to assume we'll win 2 games is just hating... if you would even say 4 I could see your point... but come on...

J. Russ obviously improved (still has a ong way to go) and he'll probably improve more... our WR's came out and showed us something towards the end of the year

we'll have a healthy Mcfadden... we finally know what Michael Bush can do... hopefully we'll strengthen the O and D lines

fact is we've been slowly improving since the horrible Art Shell season... I see that improvement continuing... slowly... but still better
lol what makes u think any FA worth a shit is gonna go to oakland after watching the Deangelo Hall saga unfold?
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#68
jesus christ Chree... I can't even talk to you

I gotta go to the gym... I'm leaving... talk to me later when you finish drinking your haterade fool

 
Jan 9, 2006
1,771
6
0
www.myspace.com
#77
THEY MIGHT AS WELL STICK WIT CABLE AND HIRE A YOUNG OFF .COORDINATOR ROB RYAN SUCKS TO FIRE HIM OVERRATED. HIS BROTHER IS BETTER IN BALTIMORE.. NOBODY WANTS TO GO THERE TO BE AL'S BITCH..ONLY WAY THEY'LL GET A GOOD COACH IS IF AL PAYS THEM A LOT OF DOUGH LIKE 8 MILL A YEAR PLUS FOR A COACH.WOW!!
 
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
36
#78
his brother also has way more talent to work with...watching raider games i like some of the schemes they come up with on d...they just need players...with talent AND football skills to execute em properly....
 

Joey

Sicc OG
Jul 2, 2002
4,090
894
113
44
#79
his brother also has way more talent to work with...watching raider games i like some of the schemes they come up with on d...they just need players...with talent AND football skills to execute em properly....
Rushing 4 down lineman with no one EVER blitzing is a good scheme? We had talent of D.......Fuck Rob Ryan he needs out........Playing with a lead and letting the opposite team throw the ball down the field is just stupid......We had leads and gave them up..........Rob Ryan needs to GO.......

Like I always say.....If kiffin stayed......than monte would of been on his way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And P.S. if you raiders move to Oakland........than FUCK YOU......
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#80
Yeah Ryan needs to go... he can put together some good defensive schemes at times... but like joey said... he calls that weak ass zone coverage and allows us to give up leads

ryan has had years to get it together... I'm sure he will be gone though