The Official Golden State Warriors 2009-2010 Season

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

VanD

Sicc OG
Feb 8, 2004
5,934
40
0
39
their attitude and effort could be fixed easily with a new coach they actually wanted to play for


or do what idiot says, get rid of the players and bring in new ones... then they get disgruntled and turn into problems too... meanwhile our former players are all-stars somewhere else.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,020
2
38
Monta's problems go beyond just coaching and management. He's been a terrible teammate to our young players this season and cant handle any adversity when its in his face. When things go wrong Monta crumbles and throws a tantrum.
 
May 10, 2002
4,203
7
38
47
That would be correct...and in order for Jackson to get assists he has to look to move the ball, something he wasn't doing much of last night or alot of previous games. Look at his assist number through out the last 5 games.

vs MEM - 6 assists
vs LAC - 2 assists
vs SAC - 2 assists
vs MIN - 15 assists
vs IND - 3 assists

If you think those assist numbers vs Minny were simply because players were hitting shots and not because he was looking to move the ball more I cant help you. Players were hitting their shots against Memphis and Jackson only had a 3rd of the amount of assists he had against the Wolves.
The Ws shot 54% against Memphis. Monta had 12 assists and Stephen Curry had 9 (a point I already brought up). Soooooo what's your point?

They shot 57% against the T-Wolves

They shot 34% against the Clippers while getting up the same amount of shots (well almost, 84 in the Clips game to 87 in the Grizz game, 91 in the T'Wolves game). Monta had 6 assists against the Clippers. He would have had more had a few more shots went in.

First your problem was with Buike and Maggetteos, then Monta and now it's Stephen Jackson? Sounds like a problem with the system and not the players to me.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,020
2
38
The Ws shot 54% against Memphis. Monta had 12 assists and Stephen Curry had 9 (a point I already brought up). Soooooo what's your point?
LOL come on man...you asked me to give you an example of how the Warriors played different against the Wolves. I showed how Jackson made a better effort to move the ball that game than any other game but I guess thats still going over your head...just forget it. I feel like Im arguing with a tree.
 
May 10, 2002
4,203
7
38
47
LOL come on man...you asked me to give you an example of how the Warriors played different against the Wolves. I showed how Jackson made a better effort to move the ball that game than any other game but I guess thats still going over your head...just forget it. I feel like Im arguing with a tree.
:mad:

No need to be disrespectful. What I said was to name a specific half court context that was different between the two games. That shit you just said is a subjective generalization. Understand the difference? If you don't it's all good.

Don't get me wrong, I understand what you're getting at. I just don't happen to agree. To me, your point of view is very narrow and you're not taking other things into consideration other than the things that make you want to speak out in the first place.

Look at the system they're in. One minute it's "Shoot whenever you're open", then tomorrow it's, "I wish he'd be the guy that would pass more", then next week it's, "He's got to take the open shot", etc...
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,020
2
38
:mad:

No need to be disrespectful. What I said was to name a specific half court context that was different between the two games. That shit you just said is a subjective generalization. Understand the difference? If you don't it's all good.

Don't get me wrong, I understand what you're getting at. I just don't happen to agree. To me, your point of view is very narrow and you're not taking other things into consideration other than the things that make you want to speak out in the first place.

Look at the system they're in. One minute it's "Shoot whenever you're open", then tomorrow it's, "I wish he'd be the guy that would pass more", then next week it's, "He's got to take the open shot", etc...
My bad Im not trying to disrespect. How about Maggette driving and passing out to an open shooter on one play(something I already mentioned). That is something that NEVER happens that I saw against the Wolves. How about Jackson feeding the big men more consistantly. you dont see that often either which happened more against the Wolves.

I have no problem with guys taking open shots but it all depends on the situation and who is taking the shot. If a guy is hot of course I wanna see him take more shots, if he's stone cold Id rather see him set up teammates or move the ball more. If its someone like Morrow Id much rather see them shooting jump shots than someone like Maggette. I just like players that are smart enough to know when to shoot and when not to. Thats why I have a problem with guys like Maggette and Jackson. I havn't seen Azubuike take many bad shots this season so Ill give him a break.
 

VanD

Sicc OG
Feb 8, 2004
5,934
40
0
39
its not just passing, its moving without the ball. if someone is open, they usually find them. the wolves game players got open and made themselves available, during the pacers game it wasnt there.

now move on to a new topic, we dont need 10 more pages of yall nonsense about assists.
 
Jun 23, 2002
3,925
1,104
0
the warriors are not only fighting amongst themselves, they are causing the fans to turn against each other too. lol this is a disaster