The islam thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#1
I smoked a zip,
and one day i'm feelin crazy

Islam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to: navigation, search




This article contains Arabic text, written from right to left in a cursive style with some letters joined.

Without proper rendering support, you may see unjoined Arabic letters written left-to-right, instead of right-to-left or other symbols instead of Arabic script.


Mecca, the holiest city in Islam




Part of a series on

Islam




Beliefs
Allah ·
Oneness of God
Muhammad ·
Other prophets
Practices
Profession of faith ·
Prayer
Fasting ·
Charity ·
Pilgrimage
Texts and laws
Qur'an · Sunnah · Hadith
Fiqh · Sharia · Kalam · Sufism
History and leadership
Timeline · Spread of Islam
Ahl al-Bayt · Sahaba
Sunni · Shi'a
Rashidun · Shi'a imams
Culture and society
Academics · Animals · Art
Calendar · Children
Demographics · Festivals
Mosques · Philosophy
Science · Women
Politics · Dawah
Islam and other religions
Christianity · Judaism
Hinduism · Sikhism · Jainism
See also
Criticism · Islamophobia
Glossary of Islamic terms
Islam portal
v d e

For other meanings, including people named 'Islam', see Islam (disambiguation). Islam (Arabic: الإسلام‎ al-’islām, pronounced [ʔislæːm] (
listen)[note 1]) is a
monotheistic, Abrahamic religion originating with the teachings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, a 7th century Arab religious and political figure. The word Islam is a homograph having multiple meanings and a triliteral of the word salam, which directly translates as peace. Other meanings include submission, or the total surrender of oneself to God (Arabic: الله‎, Allāh) (see Islam (term)).[1] An adherent of Islam is known as a Muslim, meaning "one who submits [to God]".[2][3] The word Muslim is the participle of the same verb of which Islām is the infinitive. There are approximately 1.8 billion Muslims, making Islam the second-largest religion in the world, after Christianity.[4]
Muslims believe that God revealed the Qur'an to Muhammad, God's final prophet, through the angel Gabriel, and regard the Qur'an and the Sunnah (words and deeds of Muhammad) as the fundamental sources of Islam.[5] They do not regard Muhammad as the founder of a new religion, but as the restorer of the original monotheistic faith of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and other prophets. Islamic tradition holds that Jews and Christians distorted the revelations God gave to these prophets by either altering the text, introducing a false interpretation, or both.[6]
Islam includes many religious practices. Adherents are generally required to observe the Five Pillars of Islam, which are five duties that unite Muslims into a community.[7] In addition to the Five Pillars, Islamic law (sharia) has developed a tradition of rulings that touch on virtually all aspects of life and society. This tradition encompasses everything from practical matters like dietary laws and banking to warfare and welfare.[8] Almost all Muslims belong to one of two major denominations, the Sunni (85%) and Shi'a (15%). The schism developed in the late 7th century following disagreements over the religious and political leadership of the Muslim community. Islam is the predominant religion in much of Africa and the Middle East, as well as in major parts of Asia.[9] Large communities are also found in China, the Balkan Peninsula in Eastern Europe and Russia. There are also large Muslim immigrant communities in other parts of the world, such as Western Europe. Of the total world Muslim population, about 20% live in the Arab countries[10] (where Muslims comprise majority populations, with Christian and other religious minorities of differing sizes by country), 30% in the countries of the Indian subcontinent, and 15.6% in Indonesia alone, which is the largest Muslim country in absolute numbers.[11]
Contents






[hide]
^ click on the links to learn more. i dont give a fuck what this thread does, its gon do what it do.
 
May 20, 2006
2,240
10
0
62
#6
@Gas One

great thread pimpin. most folks don't have a clue about the truth of Islam and you've put some good hard info out there for people to digest.

that's way better than the way i first learned about Islam.... In the county jail w/some brothers from the Moorish Science Temple... rofl......
 

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#9
all religions have interesting viewpoints on things. i think theyre all informative.

its weird how ever since bin laden or whatever everyone has this negative stereotype of islam and muslims

but i guess thats been going on since christians and catholics warring about bullshit
 
Oct 3, 2006
5,631
1,842
113
38
#10
all religions have interesting viewpoints on things. i think theyre all informative.

its weird how ever since bin laden or whatever everyone has this negative stereotype of islam and muslims

but i guess thats been going on since christians and catholics warring about bullshit
you can blame the media esp fox news on that
 
Jun 11, 2004
2,296
1,405
0
#11
religion is the bane of mankind. long after humans evolve beyond social, ethnic, and sexual discrimination, religious persecution will remain.
 
Apr 7, 2005
13,696
159
63
52
www.myspace.com
#14
good shit gas....its ignorant to speak on anything you have no knowledge on, so maybe knuckleheads can read for themselves what its all about.....then go back to bein' a more educated asshole. hahahaha
 
Aug 17, 2004
385
5
0
#15
You should post up some of the 5%er info. Its pretty interesting.

Also Christianity and Islam are very similar, its just that America is a christian nation so of course the people who actually run the country will try their hardest to close your mind about other religions.. The government doesn't want people with open minds, its easier to control. Which is a real big reason why LSD and such was eventually banned. It wasn't just the side effects but how it opened peoples minds and started to bring a whole new light to our existence.
 

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#17
(give me time to edit, gotta fix code.)

The Nation of Gods and Earths

Jump to: navigation, search

One of the few extant photographs of Clarence 13X, founder of The Nation of Gods and Earths, date unknown


The Nation of Gods and Earths, sometimes referred to as the Five-Percent Nation, the Five-Percent Nation of Islam, or the Five Percenters was founded in 1964 in the Harlem section of Manhattan, New York by Clarence 13X, who was born Clarence Smith, but is known to his young disciples as Allah (the Arabic term for God) or the Father. The Five Percent angered religious and political leaders, who viewed the group as an offshoot of the Nation of Islam, which was already viewed by traditional Muslims as heretical[citation needed]. The Nation of Gods and Earths teaches that the Original Blackman is God, the Original Blackwoman is the planet Earth, and through the inner esoteric powers of the Gods and Earths, people can transform and possess their true potential.


Contents






[hide]
[edit] Founding


The Nation of Gods and Earths was founded by Clarence 13X, a member of the Nation of Islam who attended NOI Temple Number Seven in Harlem, New York, where Malcolm X was a minister from 1960 to 1963. Multiple stories exist as to why Clarence 13X left Nation of Islam, some have Clarence refusing to give up gambling; others have him questioning the unique divinity of Wallace Fard Muhammad, whom the NOI believed was the True and Living God, or questioning his position due to the fact that Fard was part Caucasian. The story states that Clarence was then disciplined by the NOI and excommunicated in 1963, but another version of events says that Clarence left on his own free will along with two others, Abu Shahid and 4 Cipher Akbar[1] who agreed with Clarence's questioning of Wallace Ford Muhammad.[2]
In December 1964, after leaving the NOI, Clarence was shot in a basement gambling den called "The Hole". After surviving the shooting, Clarence took on the name Allah and, according to some, boasted that he was immortal.[1] He then began to teach others his views based on his own interpretation of NOI teachings. He found success with the disenfranchised youth on the streets of Harlem, which, unlike the original NOI, included whites and Latinos.[3][4][5][6][7][8]

Clarence 13X taught the NOI lessons to his group of young followers, but instead of teaching them to be Muslims, he taught them that they were God like him. Women in Allah’s Nation are called Earths because the Earth is the planet on which God uses to produce life. The NGE, then, is more of a culture than a traditional religion, and, in fact, the group does not call itself a religion as such. It believes that it makes no sense to be religious or to worship any deity outside of oneself when members themselves are the Supreme Being, both collectively and individually. In addition to the lessons of the NOI, Clarence 13X taught a system of numbers that he developed called Supreme Mathematics that can be compared to the Jewish mystical tradition of Kabbalah. In this system, the numbers from zero to nine all represent principles and concepts. For example, one is knowledge, two is wisdom and three is understanding. Coming together to discuss the Supreme Mathematics is the most popular ritual of the NGE. Whenever Gods and Earths meet, they speak about the Supreme Mathematics and 120 Lessons. This dialog is called building in Five-Percent vernacular. Building is the eighth degree of the Supreme Mathematics, and it means to add on to the cipher, a completion of a circle of 360 degrees. Gods and Earths can build their minds, which means to elevate or add on to the knowledge one has. Building also refers to the building of their physical bodies, their financial status, or to intuitions.
Gods and Earths hold Universal Parliaments in various cities—usually once a month—to build on their interpretation of the Supreme Mathematics, lessons, and to discuss business concerning the Nation. These Parliaments usually take place in public parks and in schoolyards.

[edit] Teachings


[edit] Basis

The members of the Five Percenters view themselves (men of their Nation) as their own god (both individually and collectively as the Original Man).[4] Five Percenters sometimes refer to themselves as scientists, implying their search for knowledge and proof, and not beliefs in theories.[9]
The teachings of the Five Percent Nation are passed on through oral tradition, much like the griots of west Africa. The advancement of a Five Percenter is based on his or her memorization, recitation, comprehension, and practical application of the Supreme Mathematics and the Supreme Alphabet—lessons written by Clarence 13X—and also the 120 Lessons, sometimes referred to as degrees, a revised version of the Supreme Wisdom lessons of the NOI, originally written by Wallace Fard Muhammad and Elijah Muhammad.[3][6][10]


[edit] Origin of Five-Percent title

The term Five Percenter comes from NOI doctrine that 85% of the people are blind to the knowledge of themselves and God, while 10% of the people know the truth but teach a lie; included in this 10% are Christian preachers that teach that God is an unseen being. The remaining 5% are the poor righteous teachers that do not believe in the teachings of the 10%. They know and teach that God is the Blackman [sic] of Asia. Black in NOI doctrine includes anyone regardless of race and Asia refers to the whole planet as black is the presense of all color.





The entire world population can be divided into three groups:
  • The 85%, who are easily led in the wrong direction and are hard to be led in the right direction.
  • The 10%, who know who the True and Living God is, the Son of Man.
  • The 5%, who are the poor righteous teachers of the poor parts of the planet Earth, once known as Asia. They teach knowledge, wisdom, and understanding, which are true, undeniable facts and actions that are based within that grounding.
[edit] Supreme Mathematics






The Supreme Mathematics is a system of understanding numbers alongside concepts and quantitative representations that are used along with the Supreme Alphabet.[6][10] The Supreme Mathematics is actually the highest system of mathematics used to give value to numbers in addition to quantity. The system is properly used to maximize humankind's logic to solve living problems.[3][4]
  1. Knowledge
  2. Wisdom
  3. Understanding
  4. Culture of/or Freedom (applied to 40 or more)
  5. Power
  6. Equality
  7. God
  8. Build or Destroy
  9. Born
0. Cipher
[edit] Supreme Alphabet

Main article: Supreme Alphabet
The Supreme Alphabet is a system of interpreting text and finding deeper meaning in the original Muslim Lessons—or question and answers—written by Elijah Muhammad and Wallace Fard Muhammad by assigning actual meanings to the letters of the Roman alphabet. It was developed by Clarence 13X after splitting from the Nation of Islam, after which he developed his Supreme Understanding.[3][4][6][10]

[edit] Twelve Jewels of Islam






The Twelve Jewels are a variant of the Supreme Mathematics and the Supreme Alphabet, which are axioms by which one should live. Together, the three systems make up the Universal Language.
  1. Knowledge
  2. Wisdom
  3. Understanding
  4. Freedom
  5. Justice
  6. Equality
  7. Food
  8. Clothing
  9. Shelter
  10. Love
  11. Peace
  12. Happiness
[edit] Universal Flag






The Universal Flag is the group's official trademark, which consists of a sun, moon, star, and the number seven. According to its doctrine, it represents the Original Family as the following:
  • Seven—The number held sacred in many ancient and modern traditions. In Supreme Mathematics, the number seven represents Allah.
  • Sun—Another symbol of the male, the Truth, and the Light. The points around the sun symbolize the expanding universe.
  • Moon—The crescent moon symbolizes wisdom and women.
  • Star—The five-pointed star symbolizes knowledge and children as the beginning of a new sun.
The eight-pointed star represents the Nation of Gods and Earths’ Lessons of Self-Awareness:
  1. The Supreme Mathematics
  2. The Supreme Alphabet
  3. 1–10
  4. 1–36
  5. 1–14
  6. 1–40
  7. Actual Facts
  8. Solar Facts
It is said that if one knows the 120, then one knows the above degrees.

[edit] Influence and interactions


[edit] City Hall and the Urban League

The Five Percenters established a headquarters in the Harlem section of Manhattan. The Allah School in Mecca, previously known as the Street Academy, was founded in 1966 through the Urban League, with the help of the Republican mayor of New York, John Lindsay, and his assistant, Barry Gottehrer. The agreement reached between Clarence and the Urban League was a payment of one dollar a day. The school's location of 2122 7th Avenue was perceived to be lucky: in the Supreme Mathematics, the number seven represents Allah, to which the digits of the address 2122 are the sum. The first programs instituted in the school contained 10 to 30 kids, state certified teachers, and three street workers. Graduates of the street academy would transfer to an academy of transition and then on to college preparatory school. Clarence disagreed with the program originally instituted at the Urban League, and so the curriculum was later turned over to him to manage, while the daily programs switched to math, English, and self defense.[3]
There is another academy, the Allah School in Medina, located in Brooklyn.

[edit] Conflicts

The schism between Clarence and the NOI led to numerous confrontations. The murder of Clarence in 1969 remains unsolved, but it has been blamed on a number of different culprits ranging from the FBI and the New York Police Department to the Nation of Islam. The murder was a blow to the movement, but according to the direct orders of Clarence before his death, some of Clarence's earliest disciples, a group of nine men who were called the First Nine Born carried on the teachings, and an acting leadership role was assumed by his good friend, Justice. In the years to follow, the Five Percenters gained a varied reputation, from being known as outstanding members of and contributors to their communities who at one time, quelled a potential rebellion when Martin Luther King was assassinated to being called an unruly group of Black teenage thugs—even categorized as a gang by some.[3][5]

[edit] Hip hop

From the early 1980s to today, many Five Percenters are found among the American East Coast, West Coast, and Midwest, in cities such as New York City, Trenton, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, and Los Angeles, especially among the hip hop scene. Hip hop artists such as Rakim, Wu-Tang Clan, Brand Nubian, Hell Razah, Poor Righteous Teachers, Gang Starr, J-Live, Planet Asia, Nas, AZ, and many others had success spreading the theology of the Five Percenters. This spread, in part, uses the language of Supreme Mathematics, which represents universal law and order, and the Supreme Alphabet, which represents universal principles of life, ostensibly to forge solidarity with the inner-city youth through a common language.[10] The main theme of the Five-Percenter doctrine that can be heard on hip hop records is the teaching that the Original Blackman [sic] is God, the Original Blackwoman [sic] is the planet Earth, and through the inner esoteric powers of the Gods and Earths, the youth can transform and possess its true potential, which seems to overthrow the overbearing oligarchy by becoming just rulers of themselves.
Many terms that originated as Five-Percenter jargon have been adopted into the hip hop slang as well. For example, the term "G," which on the West Coast most consider to mean "gangsta" or "gang-banger"; but on the East Coast is in fact derived from the Five-Percenter belief that everyone of their Nation is God, or the letter G in the Supreme Alphabet. Other popular terms such as "word is bond," while having significantly older roots than the Five Percenters, were believed to have gained prominence through its use of the term, referring back to the Nation of Islam and the Five Percent's shared 120 Degrees.[3]


[edit] External links

 

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#18
Islamophobia


Jump to: navigation, search


Part of a series of articles on
DiscriminationGeneral formsAgeism · Biphobia · Christianophobia · Heteronormativity · Heterophobia · Homophobia · Islamophobia · Racism · Sexism · Speciesism · Religious intolerance · Reverse discrimination · Xenophobia
Specific forms[show]SocialAbleism · Adultism
Anti-homelessness · Classism
Elitism · Ephebiphobia
Eugenics
Gerontophobia · Heightism
Heterophobia · Heterosexism
Homophobia · Lesbophobia
Lookism · Mentalism
Misandry · Misogyny
Monosexism · Pediaphobia
Sizeism · Transphobia
[show]Against ethnic groupsAmerican · Arab · Armenian
Blacks · Canadian · Catalan
Chinese · English · European · French
German · Igbo · Indian · Iranian · Irish
Italian · Japanese · Jewish · Korean
Malay · Mexican · Native Americans
Polish · Portuguese · Quebec · Roma
Romanian · Russian · Scottish
Serbian · Spanish · Turkish · Ukrainian · Whites
[show]Against beliefsAtheism · Bahá'í · Catholicism
Christianity · Hinduism · Judaism
Mormonism · Islam · Neopaganism
Protestantism
New religious movements
Shi'a Islam
ManifestationsBlood libel · Ethnic cleansing
Ethnocide · Gendercide
Genocide (examples)
Hate crime · Hate speech
Lynching · Paternalism · Pogrom
Police brutality · Racial profiling
Race war · Religious persecution
Slavery
Movements[show]DiscriminatoryAryanism · Hate groups · Ku Klux Klan
Neo-Nazism · American Nazi Party
South African National Party
Supremacism · Black supremacy · White supremacy
[show]Anti-discriminatoryAutistic rights · Abolitionism
Children's rights · Civil rights · Consumer/Survivor/Ex-Patient Movement · Disability rights (Inclusion)
Father's rights · Feminism · LGBT rights
Masculism · Men's rights · Mother's rights
Women's rights · Women's / Universal suffrage · Youth rights
PoliciesDiscriminatory
Racial/Religious/Sex segregation
Apartheid · Group rights · Redlining
Internment · Ethnocracy
Numerus clausus · Ghetto benches Affirmative action
Anti-discriminatory
Emancipation · Civil rights
Desegregation · Integration
Equal opportunity · Gender equality
Counter-discriminatory
Affirmative action · Group rights
Racial quota · Reservation (India)
Reparation · Forced busing
Employment equity (Canada)
Black Economic Empowerment (BEE)
LawDiscriminatory
Anti-miscegenation · Anti-immigration
Alien and Sedition Acts · Jim Crow laws
Test Act · Apartheid laws
Ketuanan Melayu · Nuremberg Laws
Diyya · Anti-homelessness legislation
LGBT rights by country or territory
Anti-discriminatory
Anti-discrimination acts ·
Anti-discrimination law ·
14th Amendment · Crime of apartheid
CERD · CEDAW · CDE · ILO C111 · ILO C100
Other formsAdultcentrism · Androcentrism · Anthropocentrism ·
Colorism · Cronyism · Ethnocentrism ·
Economic · Genism · Gynocentrism
Linguicism · Nepotism · Triumphalism
Related topicsBigotry · Diversity ·
Eugenics · Eurocentrism
Multiculturalism · Oppression
Political correctness · Prejudice
Stereotype · Tolerance

Discrimination portalThis box: view talk edit
Islamophobia is a neologism that refers to prejudice or discrimination against Islam or Muslims.[1] The term seems to date back to the late 1980s,[2] but came into common usage after the September 11, 2001 attacks.[3] In 1997, the British Runnymede Trust defined Islamophobia as the "dread or hatred of Islam and therefore, to the fear and dislike of all Muslims," stating that it also refers to the practice of discriminating against Muslims by excluding them from the economic, social, and public life of the nation. It includes the perception that Islam has no values in common with other cultures, is inferior to the West and is a violent political ideology rather than a religion.[4] Professor Anne Sophie Roald writes that steps were taken toward official acceptance of the term in January 2001 at the "Stockholm International Forum on Combating Intolerance", where Islamophobia was recognized as a form of intolerance alongside Xenophobia and Antisemitism.[5]
Sources have suggested an increasing trend in Islamophobia, some of which attribute it to the September 11 attacks,[6] while others associate it with the increased presence of Muslims in the Western world.[7] In May 2002 the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC), a European Union watchdog, released a report entitled "Summary report on Islamophobia in the EU after 11 September 2001", which described an increase in Islamophobia-related incidents in European member states post-9/11.[8] Although the term is widely recognized and used, it has not been without controversy.[9].
Critics claim that the word Islamophobia is fallacious, as a phobia is defined as an irrational fear of something, and that fear of Islam or Muslims is influenced by the violent examples featured in the news.[10]
Contents

[hide]
Etymology

The term is formed of Islam, the post-classical Latin -o- connecting vowel, and the post-classical Latin combining form -phobia which is used to form nouns with the sense 'irrational fear of' or 'aversion to.'[11] See List of anti-ethnic and anti-national terms for other "-phobia" coinages. As opposed to being a psychological or individualistic phobia, according to associate professor of religion Peter Gottschalk, Islamophobia connotes a social anxiety about Islam and Muslims.[12][13]

Definitions

A number of individuals and organizations have made attempts to define the concept. Kofi Annan told a UN conference on Islamophobia in 2004: "[W]hen the world is compelled to coin a new term to take account of increasingly widespread bigotry, that is a sad and troubling development. Such is the case with Islamophobia."[14]
In 1996, the Runnymede Trust established the Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia, chaired by Professor Gordon Conway, the vice-chancellor of the University of Sussex. Their report, Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All, was launched in November 1997 by the Home Secretary, Jack Straw. In this report, Islamophobia was defined by the Trust as "an outlook or world-view involving an unfounded dread and dislike of Muslims, which results in practices of exclusion and discrimination."[15] An early documented use of the word in the United States was by the conservative American Insight magazine in 1991, used to describe Russian activities in Afghanistan.[15] Other claims of early use include usage by Iranian clerics in 1979,[16] or its use in 1921 by a painter of Etienne Dinet.[17]
The American writer Stephen Schwartz has defined Islamophobia as the condemnation of the entirety of Islam and its history as extremist; denying the existence of a moderate Muslim majority; regarding Islam as a problem for the world; treating conflicts involving Muslims as necessarily their own fault; insisting that Muslims make changes to their religion; and inciting war against Islam as a whole.[18]
In a 2007 article in Journal of Sociology defines Islamophobia as anti-Muslim racism and a continuation of anti-Asian and anti-Arab racism.[19]
In a 2008 article in the "Journal of Political Ideologies" Jose P. Zuquete argues that Islamophobia is a catch-all term that should be avoided. Islamophobia places under the broad umbrella of 'fear or hatred of Islam' discourses and criticisms that may have distinct sources, motivations and goals. He argues instead for the use of "anti-Islamic" (because it distinguishes between different discourses about Islam).

Perceptions

The Runnymede report identified eight perceptions related to Islamophobia:
  1. Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
  2. It is seen as separate and "other." It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected by them and does not influence them.
  3. It is seen as inferior to the West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive, and sexist.
  4. It is seen as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism, and engaged in a clash of civilizations.
  5. It is seen as a political ideology, used for political or military advantage.
  6. Criticisms made of "the West" by Muslims are rejected out of hand.
  7. Hostility towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.
  8. Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural and normal.[20]
The above perceptions are seen as closed views on Islam. These are contrasted, in the report, with open views on Islam which, while founded on respect for Islam, permit legitimate disagreement, dialogue and critique.[21] According to Benn and Jawad, The Runnymede Trust notes that anti-Muslim discourse is increasingly seen as respectable, providing examples on how hostility towards Islam and Muslims is accepted as normal, even among those who may actively challenge other prevalent forms of discrimination.[22]
In some societies, Islamophobia has materialized due to the portrayal of Islam and Muslims as the national "Other", where exclusion and discrimination occurs on the basis of their religion and civilization which differs with national tradition and identity. Examples include Pakistani and Algerian migrants in Britain and France respectively.[23] This sentiment, according to Malcolm Brown and Robert Miles, significantly interacts with racism, although Islamophobia itself is not racism.[24] The publication "Social Work and Minorities: European Perspectives" describes Islamophobia as the new form of racism in Europe,[25] arguing that "Islamophobia is as much a form of racism as Anti-Semitism, a term more commonly encountered in Europe as a sibling of Racism, Xenophobia and Intolerance."[26]
Brown and Miles write that another feature of Islamophobic discourse is to amalgamate nationality (i.e. Arab), religion (Islam), and politics (terrorism, fundamentalism) — while most other religions are not associated with terrorism, or even "ethnic or national distinctiveness."[27] They feel that "many of the stereotypes and misinformation that contribute to the articulation of Islamophobia are rooted in a particular perception of Islam", such as the notion that Islam promotes terrorism; especially prevalent after the September 11, 2001 attacks.[28]
While the 9/11 attacks may have triggered a wave of Islamophobia in the US, it is thought that this is not necessarily the case throughout the world. In countries in historical and persistent (often, current) conflict with Muslim entities, notably including Thailand and Russia, Islamophobia is a result of conflict in the past, and is further reinforced by current conflicts, such as Islamic separatism in Pattani, Chechnya, etc. Islamophobia is thought to be prevalent also in societies that have fought for independence, moreso recently, from Islamic entities. Areas falling into this category, such as Greece and Bulgaria, often view the past rule as imperialistic, oppressive and cruel, and associate Islam with it. Finally, in societies that are extremely proud and protective of their secularism, and liberal, progressive politics, especially the Netherlands, Islamophobia may stem from a view that resident Muslims in the country form a barrier to further secular/liberal reform. Indeed, in the Netherlands, most of the minimal resistence to the 2001 institution of same-sex marraige actually came from the Muslim community.
Especially among the LGBT peoples of the West, there is a growing resentment towards Islam, especially its spread, with the growing distance between the West and the Islamic world on views on homosexuality and tolerance towards it. Many websites refer to Islam, often collectively with Christianity, as "irrational hate-creating religions" or "cults". This view is not completely unbacked- there is not a single Islamic country in the world considered to have liberal laws regarding homosexuality, and the majority, in fact, have homosexuality illegal. Furthermore, every country in the world that currently retains the death penalty for homosexuality is Muslim.

Media

According to Elizabeth Poole in the Encyclopedia of Race and Ethnic studies, the media has been criticized for perpetrating Islamophobia. She cites a case study examining a sample of articles in the British press from between 1994 and 2004, which concluded that Muslim viewpoints were underrepresented and that issues involving Muslims usually depicted them in a negative light. Such portrayals, according to Poole, include the depiction of Islam and Muslims as a threat to Western security and values.[29] Benn and Jawad write that hostility towards Islam and Muslims are "closely linked to media portrayals of Islam as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist."[22] Egorova and Tudor cite European researchers in suggesting that expressions used in the media such as "Islamic terrorism", "Islamic bombs" and "violent Islam" have resulted in a negative perception of Islam.[30]
There have been several initiatives, based upon the sixty recommendations listed in the Runnymede Trust's report, aimed at increase Muslim participation in media and politics. Soon after the release of the Runnymede report, the Muslim Council of Britain was formed to serve as an umbrella body aiming to "represent Muslims in the public sphere, to lobby government and other institutions." The "Forum Against Islamophobia and Racism" (FAIR) was also established, designed to monitor coverage in the media and establish dialogue with media organizations. Following the attacks of September 11, the Islam Awareness Week and the "Best of British Islam Festival" were introduced to improve community relations and raise awareness about Islam.[31]

Trends

Islamophobia has become a topic of increasing sociological and political importance.[27] According to Benn and Jawad, Islamophobia has increased since British Muslims' denouncement of Salman Rushdie's "The Satanic Verses" and the September 11 attacks.[32] Anthropologist Steven Vertovec writes that the purported growth in Islamophobia may be associated with increased Muslim presence in society and successes.[7] He suggests a circular model, where increased hostility towards Islam and Muslims results in governmental countermeasures such as institutional guidelines and changes to legislation, which itself may fuel further Islamophobia due to increased accommodation for Muslims in public life. Vertovec concludes: "As the public sphere shifts to provide a more prominent place for Muslims, Islamophobic tendencies may amplify."[7]
Patel, Humphries, and Naik claim that "Islamophobia has always been present in Western countries and cultures. In the last two decades, it has become accentuated, explicit and extreme."[33] However, Vertovec states that some have observed that Islamophobia has not necessarily escalated in the past decades, but that there has been increased public scrutiny of it.[7] According to Abduljalil Sajid, one of the members of the Runnymede Trust's Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia, "Islamophobias" have existed in varying strains throughout history, with each version possessing its own distinct features as well as similarities or adaptations from others.[34] An observatory report on Islamophobia by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference similarly states that Islamophobia has existed for as long as Islam itself.[35]
Despite being a sizeable minority, many Muslims in India tend to complain about substantial discrimination by Hindus.[36] According to a recently published report to government, called the Sachar Report, Muslims are heavily under-represented in different government and social areas.[37][38][39] Among other facts, it found that in the province of West Bengal, where Muslims make up 27% of the population, their employment in the government sector was below 3%.[40]

EUMC reports

The largest project monitoring Islamophobia was undertaken following 9/11 by the EU watchdog, European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC). Their May 2002 report "Summary report on Islamophobia in the EU after 11 September 2001", written Chris Allen (UK) and Jorgen S. Nielsen of the University of Birmingham, was based on 75 reports — 15 from each EU member nation.[41][42] The report highlighted the regularity with which ordinary Muslims became targets for abusive and sometimes violent retaliatory attacks after 9/11. Despite localized differences within each member nation, the recurrence of attacks on recognizable and visible traits of Islam and Muslims was the report's most significant finding. Incidents consisted of verbal abuse, blaming all Muslims for terrorism, forcibly removing women's hijabs, spitting on Muslims, calling children "Usama," and random assaults. Muslims have been hospitalized and on one occasion paralyzed.[42] The report also discussed the portrayal of Muslims in the media. Inherent negativity, stereotypical images, fantastical representations, and exaggerated caricatures were all identified. The report concluded that "a greater receptivity towards anti-Muslim and other xenophobic ideas and sentiments has, and may well continue, to become more tolerated."[42]
The EUMC has since released a number of publications related to Islamophobia, including "The Fight against Antisemitism and Islamophobia: Bringing Communities together (European Round Tables Meetings)" (2003) and "Muslims in the European Union: Discrimination and Islamophobia" (2006).[43]

Views


Salman Rushdie was one of 12 writers who signed a statement regarding Islamophobia; "We refuse to renounce our critical spirit out of fear of being accused of "Islamophobia", a wretched concept that confuses criticism of Islam as a religion and stigmatisation of those who believe in it."[44]


The concept of Islamophobia has been criticized on several grounds.[45][46][47] Some critics argue that it is real, but is just another form of racism and does not require its own category,[48] while others argue that it is used to censor criticism and that its use threatens free speech.[46][49] Novelist Salman Rushdie and others signed a manifesto entitled Together facing the new totalitarianism in March 2006 which denounced Islamophobia as "a wretched concept."[44] Some opponents argue that Islamophobia is justified.[9] Others, such as Edward Said, consider Islamophobia as it is evinced in Orientalism to be a 'secret sharer' in a more general antisemitic Western tradition[50][51][52] However, Daniel Pipes says that "'Islamophobia' deceptively conflates two distinct phenomena: fear of Islam and fear of radical Islam."[53]
The concept of Islamophobia as formulated by Runnymede is criticized by professor Fred Halliday on several levels. He writes that the target of hostility in the modern era is not Islam and its tenets as much as it is Muslims and their actions, suggesting that a more accurate term would be "Anti-Muslimism."[54] Poole responds by noting that many Islamophobic discourses attack what they perceive to be Islam's tenets, while Miles and Brown write that Islamophobia is usually based upon negative stereotypes about Islam which are then translated into attacks on Muslims.[55][56] Halliday also states that strains and types of prejudice against Islam and Muslims vary across different nations and cultures, which is not recognized in the Runnymede analysis. Miles and Brown respond by arguing that "the existence of different ‘Islamophobias’ does not invalidate the concept of Islamophobia any more than the existence of different racisms invalidates the concept of racism."[55] Halliday argues that the concept of Islamophobia unwittingly plays into the hands of extremists.[54]
British writer and academic Kenan Malik believes that the charge of Islamophobia confuses discrimination against Muslims with criticism of Islam, and that it is used to silence critics and Muslim reformers. He writes that the extent to which Muslims are more vulnerable to social exclusion and attacks than other groups is frequently and allows for a culture of victimhood, where all failings are attributed to Islamophobia. Islamophobia is not a form of racism, in his view, because Islam is a belief system.[57] This analysis is criticized by Inayat Bunglawala from the Muslim Council of Britain and Abdul Wahid from the Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir.[58] Bunglawala writes that Malik's argument is limited to overt acts of violence against Muslims, without recognizing less overt forms of prejudice or discrimination. By ignoring non-violent examples of Islamophobia, Malik's commentary "makes a mockery of victims of prejudice by pretending they have not been discriminated against," according to Bunglawala.[58]
In the wake of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, a group of 12 writers signed a statement in the French weekly satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in March 2006, warning against the use of the term Islamophobia to prevent criticism of "Islamic totalitarianism." The novelist Salman Rushdie was among these signatories.[44] These views are shared by Dutch law professor Afshin Ellian.[59] Critics cite the case of British journalist Polly Toynbee, who was nominated in May 2003 for the title of "Most Islamophobic Media Personality of the Year" at the 'Annual Islamophobia Awards' overseen by the Islamic Human Rights Commission, for claiming that Islam "... imposes harsh regimes that deny the most basic human rights."[60]
In an article called "Fighting Islamophobia: A Response to Critics", Assistant Professor Deepa Kumar writes that the modern-day demonization of Arabs and Muslims by US politicians and others is racist and Islamophobic, and employed in support of an unjust war. About the public impact of this rhetoric, she says that "One of the consequences of the relentless attacks on Islam and Muslims by politicians and the media is that Islamophobic sentiment is on the rise." She also chides some "people on the left" for using the same "Islamophobic logic as the Bush regime". She concludes with the statement "At times like this, people of conscience need to organize and speak out against Islamophobia."[61]
Johann Hari of The Independent has criticized the use of the term by organizations like Islamophobia Watch, arguing that liberal Muslims interested in reform are left unsupported because people fear being accused of Islamophobia.[62] Writing in the New Humanist, philosopher Piers Benn suggests that people who fear the rise of Islamophobia foster an environment "not intellectually or morally healthy", to the point that what he calls "Islamophobia-phobia" can undermine "critical scrutiny of Islam as somehow impolite, or ignorant of the religion's true nature."[63] The New Criterion editor Roger Kimball argues that the word "Islamophobia" is a misnomer. "A phobia describes an irrational fear, and it is axiomatic that fearing the effects of radical Islam is not irrational, but on the contrary very well-founded indeed, so that if you want to speak of a legitimate phobia... ...we should speak instead of Islamophobia-phobia, the fear of and revulsion towards Islamophobia."[64]

Public discourse


Efforts against

There have been efforts against perceived Islamophobia by many organizations in many countries; some of these are detailed below.
Acts called Islamophobic


A protester at a counter-demonstration against the September 15, 2007 anti-war protest in Washington, D.C.


Views called Islamophobic

ABC News has reported that "[p]ublic views of Islam are one casualty of the post-Sept. 11, 2001 conflict: Nearly six in 10 Americans think the religion is prone to violent extremism, nearly half regard it unfavorably, and a remarkable one in four admits to prejudicial feelings against Muslims and Arabs alike."[121] They also report that 27 percent of Americans admit feelings of prejudice against Muslims.[121] According to Gallup polls, 40 percent of Americans admit to prejudice against Muslims, and 39 percent believe Muslims should carry special identification. [122]

Incidents on aircraft

Some incidents with Muslim passengers on aircraft have given rise to the expression "Flying while Muslim".[123]
  • On 16 August 2006 British passengers on-board a flight from Malaga to Manchester requested the removal of two men of Asian descent from a plane. According to a spokesman for the Civil Guard in Malaga, "These men had aroused suspicion because of their appearance and the fact that they were speaking in a foreign language thought to be an Arabic language, and the pilot was refusing to take off until they were escorted off the plane." A security sweep of the plane found no explosives or any item of a terrorist nature. Monarch Airlines booked the men, who were Urdu speakers, into a hotel room, gave them a free meal and sent them home on a later plane. The men later responded, "Just because we're Muslim, does not mean we are suicide bombers." The Islamic Human Rights Commission blamed "ever-increasing Islamophobia" related to the "war on terror" for the incident.[124][125][126]
  • A passenger traveling to the British Virgin Islands on a plane bound for the United States from Manchester in the UK was forced off the plane prior to takeoff. The man, a British-born Muslim residing in the United States, said he was singled out because he was a Muslim pilot and was left feeling "demoralized and humiliated. I must have met the profile on the day. I have an Arabic name, I am a Muslim, I'm from Britain and I know how to fly."[127][128]
  • On 21 November 2006, six imams were forcefully removed from a US Airways flight at Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport for alleged security reasons. The event led to an outcry from Muslim organizations in America saying that what happened showed the growing prejudice against Muslims in America.[129] Investigations by the airline and police so far have reported that the airline and ground crews responded to security concerns properly in removing the men from the plane.[130] See Flying Imams controversy for more details regarding this incident.
  • In 2009 AirTran Airways removed nine Muslim passengers, including three children, from a flight and turned them over to the FBI after one of the men commented to another that they were sitting right next to the engines and wondered aloud where the safest place to sit on the plane was. Although the FBI subsequently cleared the passengers and called the incident a "misunderstanding," AirTran refused to seat the passengers on another flight, forcing them to purchase last minute tickets on another airline that had been secured with the FBI's assistance. A spokesman for AirTran initially defended the airline's actions and said they would not reimburse the passengers for the cost of the new tickets. Although the men had traditional beards and the women headscarves, AirTran denied that their actions were based on the passengers' appearance.[131] The following day, after the incident received widespread media coverage, AirTran reversed its position and issued a public apology, adding that it would in fact reimburse the passengers for the cost of their rebooked tickets.[132]
See also

 
Jun 23, 2002
3,925
1,104
0
#20
cool thread. but as long as people are using Islam for their own greedy needs then the true essence of religion will never be realized. my 2 cents