The Female Positions

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 13, 2005
171
0
0
#21
Well, this particular "paper" was hard to read because it was poorly written. But anyway.

I'm not read on womens' studies. All I know is behavior from the thousands of women I've met in my lifetime. From scholars with MA's to bitches with 20 kids in the ghetto...and the ONE thing they all have in common is constantly making poor decisions based on emotionalism. Women with PHD's...IQ's that DWARF mine, have done some incredibly stupid shit on the drop of a harmone you wouldn't believe. And the reverse isn't nearly as true for men.

And White Devil, I read awhile back of a study showing that men physically larger in the workforce tend to get promoted faster. I think physical intimidation definitely counts for something in everyday life.
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
42
#22
Joe DiMaggio said:
I'm not read on womens' studies. All I know is behavior from the thousands of women I've met in my lifetime. From scholars with MA's to bitches with 20 kids in the ghetto...and the ONE thing they all have in common is constantly making poor decisions based on emotionalism. Women with PHD's...IQ's that DWARF mine, have done some incredibly stupid shit on the drop of a harmone you wouldn't believe. And the reverse isn't nearly as true for men.
For thousands of years, men have been making poor decisions. Human beings make poor decisions. Women make poor decisions. Women may make a few bad choices in life based on estrogen, but whole wars have been started over a little too much testosterone.
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
42
#23
Joe DiMaggio said:
I read awhile back of a study showing that men physically larger in the workforce tend to get promoted faster. I think physical intimidation definitely counts for something in everyday life.
That, however, I know to be true unfortunately. I've also not been promoted because a female manager didn't get along with me, and preferred the guys in the unit.

There's crappiness everywhere, in either gender.
 
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#24
CannibalCrow said:
It is possible to feel as an equal and be a woman, and not be a feminist. I am not a feminist, but I am in no way tied to old thinkings on women. Then again, I'm more of the sort of deal with everyone on an individual basis. Race, gender, religion and orientation are there, but there's no equality struggle. I've been hated for my gender, because a woman hurt someone badly. I had to suffer for that. That was his problem, not mine. Racists, homophobes and misogynists usually make an ideal image of the thing they hate, and won't stray from their thought processes.

PREACH!


AND IN THE ARTICLE IT SAID THAT IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A WOMAN TO BE STRONGER THEN A WEAK MAN..REGARDLESS OF UPBRINGING..EVERY MAN ISNT BROUGHT UP TO PLAY FOOTBALL OR LIFT WIEGHTS..SO YES IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A WOMAN TO BE PHYSICALLY STRONGER THEN A MAN..NOT SAYING IT WOULD BE POPULAR TO SEE..BUT POSSIBLE

AND EVEN THOUGH CERTAIN DISCOVERIES HAVE BEEN MADE...IT WILL TAKE HUNDREDS OF YEARS TO BE ACCEPTED...JUST LIKE RACISM...BASICALLY CERTAIN HARD HEADED GENERATIONS OF PEOPLE NEED TO DIE OFF FOR OUR WORLDS THINKING TO EVEN BE TRANSFORMED

AND ON A PERSONAL OPINION NOTE:
[food for thought] WHEN A MAN PHYSICALLY ASSULTS A WOMAN (whether it be his girl or anyone else) ITS USUALLY BECAUSE HE HAS LOST CONTROL OVER HER ..MAYBE SHE IS MOUTHING OFF AND WONT STOP AND MAKING HIM LOOK DUMB..OR WHATEVER MAY BE....MY POINT IS..PEOPLE RESORT TO CONTROL AND DEGRADE SOMEONE ELSE, ONCE THEY FEEL THREATEND OR A LOSS OF CONTROL...ITS USUALLY A MAIN FACTOR FOR ALOT OF PREJUDICE THAT EXISTS AND /OR EXISTED...AND THAT ALONE! IS PROOF OF THE STRENGTH IN WOMEN..MINORTIES..ETC...

 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#25
CannibalCrow

Do you think there is a point where enough young women ignore the choices that have been made available through years of battle that those choices start to no longer exhist?

Like if enough of these young girls start reverting back to being sex objects and not equals that position of equality evaporates?

Or if enough women start staying at home and just pumping out kids that the possibility of getting quality employment on the level of men no longer exhists?
 
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#26
ColdBlooded said:
CannibalCrow

Do you think there is a point where enough young women ignore the choices that have been made available through years of battle that those choices start to no longer exhist?

Like if enough of these young girls start reverting back to being sex objects and not equals that position of equality evaporates?

Or if enough women start staying at home and just pumping out kids that the possibility of getting quality employment on the level of men no longer exhists?

I THINK ITS A SHAME WHEN I SEE IT..BUT GAINING "RIGHTS" MEANS YOU HAVE A CHOICE AS A WOMAN IN THE UNITED STATES, TO BE TREATED AS AN EQUAL HUMAN BEING...AND WOMEN DONT GET PREGNANT BY THEMSELVES...IT TAKES A LOOSE MAN OR MEN TO CONTRIBUTE TO A WOMAN THAT IS HAVING TOO MANY BABIES ALONE WITHOUT THE HELP OF A HUSBAND AND MOST WOMEN THAT ARE LIKE THAT, SEE NOTHING WRONG BECAUSE THEY SAW THIER MOTHER DO IT WHEN THEIR DAD DIDNT WANT TO BE A PART OF THEIR LIVES...SO ITS A CYCLE OF WRONG WITH MEN AND WOMEN...AND JUST LIKE MEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE LAZY THUGS...ON THE STREET SLANGIN WHATEVER IT IS THEY ARE SLANGIN....A WOMAN HAS AN EQUAL RIGHT TO BE A LAZY AND PROMISCUOUS...I PERSONALLY THINK ITS A SHAME FOR ANYONE TO WASTE THEIR LIFE OVER BULLSHYT ..BUT WHEN WOMEN BECAME EQUAL IN REGARDS TO HAVING RIGHTS IN THE US...THE CHOICE TO BE CARELESS IS ALSO CONSIDERED A CHOICE..AND ITS THEIR RIGHT
 
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#27
ColdBlooded said:
CannibalCrow

Do you think there is a point where enough young women ignore the choices that have been made available through years of battle that those choices start to no longer exhist?

Like if enough of these young girls start reverting back to being sex objects and not equals that position of equality evaporates?

Or if enough women start staying at home and just pumping out kids that the possibility of getting quality employment on the level of men no longer exhists?
OH YEAH..AND NO I DONT THINK THAT WILL EVER BECOME A FACTOR...IT MAY BE THAT WHEREVER YOU ARE, YOU MAY ONLY SEE THAT TYPE OF WOMAN.,..BUT THERE ARE MANY SUCCESS STORIES OF WOMEN BECOMING SUCCESSFUL AND UTILIZING ALL OF THEIR RIGHTS AS WOMAN TO BECOME BUSINESS OWNERS AND CEO'S...SO I CANT SEE THAT HAPPENING

WHO YOU VOTIN FOR NEXT TERM? HILARY OR CONDOLEESA (SP)
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
42
#28
ColdBlooded said:
CannibalCrow

Do you think there is a point where enough young women ignore the choices that have been made available through years of battle that those choices start to no longer exhist?

Like if enough of these young girls start reverting back to being sex objects and not equals that position of equality evaporates?

Or if enough women start staying at home and just pumping out kids that the possibility of getting quality employment on the level of men no longer exhists?

Honestly, I don't think so. Because even if things reverted back to a far degree, it tends to work in a cyclical pattern and there would be rebellion again. Too many women are traditional, and a few will rebel and start it anew. If it began to get too close to the old ways, young girls would not want to be like their mothers. Generations move in different ways. There will always be those who fight for their right while others are apathetic towards it. But the choices will be there for those who take it. Not every man/woman goes to college. Sometimes races, genders, orientations get disuaded and forget they have a choice. Or sometimes it's harder for them to do the things they want to do. There will always be members of that race, gender, religion, orientation ETC ETC that will fight for the rights they deserve. Even if not everyone chooses to go that way.

And there will always be those who stand in their way. Racists who don't want to see blacks be successful or working with them. Bigots who don't want to go to a latino doctor. Misogynists who don't accept women in high places. Hatred is spawned from jealousy and fear.

The same people who sit back and point out the weaknesses of a race, gender, orientation are those who envy it. A man who says women are more likely to make stupid choices is just as bad as a white man who says that all blacks are violent. Same difference. Hate and prejudice have many faces.
 
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#29
CannibalCrow said:
Honestly, I am not feminist but I believe it all comes down to CHOICE. Some hardcore feminists forget this and they put down stay at home moms, and women who are more traditional. They tell them how they should go out and work, and not be the traditional woman role.

BEING AN IN HOME MOTHER IS A CHOICE..AND THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE THAT CHOICE...WOMEN ACTIVISTS FOUGHT FOR EQUALITY...MEANING THE RIGHT TO HAVE A CHOICE IN WHAT YOU WANT TO DO..NOT BEING FORCED TO DO SOMETHING YOU DONT WANT TO DO.... "CHOICE" WAS THE MAIN FACTOR IN ALL THE ACTIVISM THAT HAS BROUGHT WOMEN THE RIGHTS TO CHOOSE, THAT THEY HAVE TODAY...NOW WITH MEN JUDGING WOMENS CHOICES...THAT THERE!! IS WHAT REVERTS US BACK TO THE TIMES WHEN MEN INTERFERED WITH WHAT A WOMEN COULD OR COULDNT DO...

NO ONE IS IN ANY PLACE TO REALLY HAVE A SAY ON WHAT ANYONE DOES..UNLESS IT AFFECTS YOU DIRECTLY..THEN YOU HAVE THE CHOICE TO LEAVE IT ALONE
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
42
#30
I won't debate strength because I am 5'5 and I can't bench even 80 lb. And I am not athletic. I have other hobbies. I sculpt, paint, draw, and write. I excell in the arts. I used to arm wrestle the boys in middle school before puberty made them stronger than they were. I do not want to have children. The prospect of childbirth is horrid to me, and finding a husband isn't a big deal. I'm not in a hurry. My decisions are based on what is logical and best for me, but also I keep other people's feelings in mind. It's a balance that all human beings need to adopt. How to do what is best for yourself while not being a dickhead to everyone else. It is true that you need to think of yourself, but helping your fellow man is also important. To get rid of ignorance and hate, there must be education. There is still racism in the US, and still bigotry. Still so much hate.

I have seen girls outrun boys, or out swim them. I have seen a guy pick up 300 lb like it was a tooth pick. Shows of strength and power that are neat to watch and helpful if you need to defend yourself.. but it is the mind and how we help each other that is the real issue.
 
Jul 13, 2005
171
0
0
#31
You can dismiss anything MzThick has to say about women's lib at this point. You'll notice the only thing positive and unique that she can announce about herself in her username is the fact that she's "thick." LOL, you're a real role model for the thinking woman.
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
42
#32
MzThicK said:
BEING AN IN HOME MOTHER IS A CHOICE..AND THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE THAT CHOICE...WOMEN ACTIVISTS FOUGHT FOR EQUALITY...MEANING THE RIGHT TO HAVE A CHOICE IN WHAT YOU WANT TO DO..NOT BEING FORCED TO DO SOMETHING YOU DONT WANT TO DO.... "CHOICE" WAS THE MAIN FACTOR IN ALL THE ACTIVISM THAT HAS BROUGHT WOMEN THE RIGHTS TO CHOOSE, THAT THEY HAVE TODAY...NOW WITH MEN JUDGING WOMENS CHOICES...THAT THERE!! IS WHAT REVERTS US BACK TO THE TIMES WHEN MEN INTERFERED WITH WHAT A WOMEN COULD OR COULDNT DO...

NO ONE IS IN ANY PLACE TO REALLY HAVE A SAY ON WHAT ANYONE DOES..UNLESS IT AFFECTS YOU DIRECTLY..THEN YOU HAVE THE CHOICE TO LEAVE IT ALONE

For real. Choice on an individual basis. I wouldn't tell a man how to run his life, and he shouldn't tell me. Then again, another woman shouldn't tell me either. I ask for advice now and then when I need help, but I have my own goals and ambitions for the long run.
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
42
#33
Joe DiMaggio said:
You can dismiss anything MzThick has to say about women's lib at this point. You'll notice the only thing positive and unique that she can announce about herself in her username is the fact that she's "thick." LOL, you're a real role model for the thinking woman.
My username could be "SuperDyke" or "CuntCasket" and I would still speak my thoughts. Though I wonder why you choose to attack her username and not her words? Maybe you didn't give her words any credit, but in that case just do not respond. There is nothing more pointless in a discussion than someone who doesn't have anything to add to it and throws an insult instead of an opinion.
 
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#34
Joe DiMaggio said:
You can dismiss anything MzThick has to say about women's lib at this point. You'll notice the only thing positive and unique that she can announce about herself in her username is the fact that she's "thick." LOL, you're a real role model for the thinking woman.
ACTUALLY YOU ARE A PRIME EXAMPLE OF JUDGING A WOMAN ON ANYTHING YOU CAN FIND BAD TO SAY ABOUT HER..MY POSTS SHOW MY MIND..AND IF YOU KNEW ME, THEN YOU WOULD KNOW THE DEPTH OF MY MIND..RESPECT IT AND EAT YOUR WORDS...BUT YOUR OPINION OF ANYTHING IS UNIMPORTANT TO ME...SO CARRY ON IN WHAT YOU DO BEST..

YOU CAME OUT OF LEFT FIELD WITH THAT ONE...YU MUST BE A MISERABLE PERSON

AND YES I DO TAKE PRIDE IN MY BODY..IVE DONE ALOT TO GET IT WHERE IT IS..I THINK ITS IMPORTANT TO KEEP YOURSELF UP..PHYSICALLY...ITS BEEN PROVEN YOU LIVE LONGER THAT WAY...
 
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#35
CannibalCrow said:
My username could be "SuperDyke" or "CuntCasket" and I would still speak my thoughts. Though I wonder why you choose to attack her username and not her words? Maybe you didn't give her words any credit, but in that case just do not respond.

OBVIOUSLY "MY NAME" IS WHAT KEPT HIS SHALLOW MINDS ATTENTION...SOME PEOPLE DONT WANT TO EXPAND THEIR BRAIN...HIS LOSS NOT MINE ..THANK YOU :)
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
42
#36
I've got nothing against men. I've got mostly male friends. It's on an individual to individual basis.

Trust me, I've experienced.. first hand.. some shitty moves that a man has made against me.
Oh ho ho.... have I.
But... no need to go into *that*... :rolleyes:

And I never held that against men in general. I never generalized that all men were like that. ....
 
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#37
CannibalCrow said:
I've got nothing against men. I've got mostly male friends. It's on an individual to individual basis.

Trust me, I've experienced.. first hand.. some shitty moves that a man has made against me.
Oh ho ho.... have I.
But... no need to go into *that*... :rolleyes:

And I never held that against men in general. I never generalized that all men were like that. ....

LOL...ITS TRUE THOUGH..GENERALIZING ALL BASED ON ONE..IS WHAT KEEPS THE CYCLE OF IGNORANCE GOING..

ITS FUNNY HOW ONLINE...PEOPLE DONT KNOW YOU FROM ADAM..BUT ASSUME THEY DO

RIGHT NOW! I MAKE IT MY LIFE TO BE A ROLE MODEL TO MANY YOUNG GIRLS AND BOYS..AND I DO IT BY CHOICE...BECAUSE I KNOW ALOT OF KIDS NEED SOMEONE TO COME TOO AND TO GUIDE THEM...

I FIND IT FUNNY WHEN PEOPLE SPEND ALL DAY TELLING THE WORLD WHAT THEY NEED..BUT SPEND NO TIME GIVING THE WORLD WHAT IT NEEDS
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
42
#38
I'm not a role model for women. I made some poor choices. All people do. I trusted the wrong people, and it took me a minute to decide what I wanted to do in life. A lot of people make bad decisions, men and women alike. Race aside...religion, orientation aside.. Just happens.
 
Jul 19, 2002
357
0
0
50
dosiared.greedygraphiks.com
#40
CannibalCrow said:
I'm not a role model for women. I made some poor choices. All people do. I trusted the wrong people, and it took me a minute to decide what I wanted to do in life. A lot of people make bad decisions, men and women alike. Race aside...religion, orientation aside.. Just happens.
EVERYONE MAKES BAD CHOICES BUT ITS UP TO THEM TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND GROW FROM THEM....YOU LEARN AND BECOME BETTER FOR THEM...AND THAT MAKES YOU A ROLE MODEL...EVERYONE CANT LEARN FROM THEIR MISTAKES , LET ALONE, EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THEM