Richard Seymour Traded to Raiders

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Sep 24, 2006
2,168
145
63
40
#22
he will most likely leave after this year is over and pats will have a high draft pick most likely replace seymour in the draft
that probably is the case just saying if there is a way he re-signs or signs an extension it would be worth trading for him but more than likely he will leave like everyone seems too
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#29
EXACTLY. PLUS SEYMOUR IS ONLY 29. GOOD PICKUP.
thats what i was gonna say, hes not a has been. Hes still got a bunch of years left although i dont think hes worth a first rounder but im not really trippen cuz they addressed an issue that was most needed. Of course non-Raider fans are gonna talk shit but really what business do they have in a Raider thread unless of course there teams blow ass.
 
Sep 29, 2003
6,584
54
0
#30
The Pats are famous for taking in washed up players and making them into stars with their schemes....It's all bad when even the Pats don't want him.......When are the Raiders gonna stop trying to buy a defense and build one for christ's sake....
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#34
The Pats are famous for taking in washed up players and making them into stars with their schemes....It's all bad when even the Pats don't want him.......When are the Raiders gonna stop trying to buy a defense and build one for christ's sake....
maybe they just have someone younger thats equally as good at the position. lol @ all you dumb shits that think 29 is washed up
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#36
what about pro bowlers who are good at there position? Hes a D-Lineman they play to like like 35 a lot of the time.
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#37
atleast we got someone who will take on some blockers freeing up others to make tackles. steep price to pay, but when you have as bad a defense as we have had, bringing in a PROVEN player isnt a bad decision.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
#39
the Patriots don't need him anyways. They still have Vince Wilfork. Good pick up for the Raiders, though. I think Seymour will still tear shit up. He's not that old.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#40
We need a tough MF like this, he ain't gone be out there lettin' us get pushed around. Offer an extension Al.... Seymour ain't no punk!