Red Light Camera Tickets
- Thread starter mrtonguetwista
- Start date
yeah, over here they use a company called redflux or some shit and they sent me in asking for a signautre of the person who was pictured. as far as im concered if you dont admit guilt to the company that operates the camera, then you wont have to deal with it threw the county/state...
id look at the laws before going on my situation tho, thos redflex cameras are a huge topic out here in cali and they are laws in legislation that are going to ban/moderate them
id look at the laws before going on my situation tho, thos redflex cameras are a huge topic out here in cali and they are laws in legislation that are going to ban/moderate them
They've had those bullshit cameras on SoCal for 5-6 years now. They know if u stopped or not because not only is it a picture camera, but it also records everything too.
Those cameras got me once but luckily they took that camera down a month later and I never got a tickey in the mail. Tickets are insanely expensive now. I recently got a ticket for being on the phone while driving and it was close to $300
Those cameras got me once but luckily they took that camera down a month later and I never got a tickey in the mail. Tickets are insanely expensive now. I recently got a ticket for being on the phone while driving and it was close to $300
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/26/red-light-cameras-may-be-_n_909708.html
"The reason for ending the citation program is that the tickets, which can reach upward of $500, go unenforced. Patch reports that "drivers with unpaid tickets are not subjected to consequential action and judges do not enforce traffic tickets generated by a camera," which makes it difficult to justify a program that costs the city $2.7 million a year."
"The reason for ending the citation program is that the tickets, which can reach upward of $500, go unenforced. Patch reports that "drivers with unpaid tickets are not subjected to consequential action and judges do not enforce traffic tickets generated by a camera," which makes it difficult to justify a program that costs the city $2.7 million a year."
