PS3 Misconceptions and Spin

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 2, 2003
1,439
6
0
#21
@masked lemon

considering every fuckin 360 is gonna break...it seems MICROSOFT r the ones who fucked up..it would seem their hardware is FUCKIN SHITTY..

tell me im wrong...my homie is on his third...i know there is a bunch of other people in the same situation..
 
May 10, 2002
5,330
344
0
TSSSSSSSSSHAAAAAAA.COM
#22
Lee:

1. I did not write that blog.

2. Microsoft doesn't need my help, they are soundly destroying Sony.

3. I am not in the games industry.

4. I do not know anyone who works for Microsoft.

5. TSSSSSSSSSSSS HAAAAAAAAAAAA! PS3 licks balls and likes it.
YOUR A FUCKIN NERD, ITS 2 GAME CONSOLES, IF X-BOXES DIDN'T BREAK DOWN AND HAD METAL GEAR SOLID SHIT I WOULD PROBABLY HAVE ONE BUT MOST GAMES COME OUT FOR BOTH SYSTEMS SO SHIT IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER, OTHER THEN SOME EXCLUSIVES

SHIT I WOULD HAVE A 360 BUT I DON'T FEEL LIKE BUYING ONE OVER AND OVER GAIN MAYBE WHEN THEY FIX THAT SHIT BUT THE POTENTIAL FOR PS3 HAS A FAR BETTER INVESTMENT AND NOW I HEAR YOU CAN USE IT AS A DVR ALSO SO SHIT TSSSSSSSS HAAAAAAAAAA TO URE BITCH ASS STICK URE 360 UP THERE AND I BET YOUD LIKE IT BITCH
 
Aug 7, 2006
2,738
6
0
44
#23
YOUR A FUCKIN NERD, ITS 2 GAME CONSOLES, IF X-BOXES DIDN'T BREAK DOWN AND HAD METAL GEAR SOLID SHIT I WOULD PROBABLY HAVE ONE BUT MOST GAMES COME OUT FOR BOTH SYSTEMS SO SHIT IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER, OTHER THEN SOME EXCLUSIVES

SHIT I WOULD HAVE A 360 BUT I DON'T FEEL LIKE BUYING ONE OVER AND OVER GAIN MAYBE WHEN THEY FIX THAT SHIT BUT THE POTENTIAL FOR PS3 HAS A FAR BETTER INVESTMENT AND NOW I HEAR YOU CAN USE IT AS A DVR ALSO SO SHIT TSSSSSSSS HAAAAAAAAAA TO URE BITCH ASS STICK URE 360 UP THERE AND I BET YOUD LIKE IT BITCH
LMAO
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#24
There is a fucking Vital up about the 360 breaking down. I'm on my 2nd system, it's not a secret. It also does not cost a fucking thing to get your system fixed. Anybody who actually buys a second 360 because their first one broke down is a fucking moron. Additionally, the new systems being manufactured have solved the problem with the Red rings, so your point is moot.

Anybody is more than free to post articles bashing the 360. Problem is, there aren't that many articles like that out there, unlike with the PS3.

Lee you bought an inferior system for a game that isn't even out yet, and from most reports will eventually end up on a superior, cheaper system. Not only do you post on a message board about video games, you have a fucking internet catch phrase, and you post "flows" as if you were a rapper or some shit. Now who's the fucking nerd, again?
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#27
pffffffft. great argument, lol

I dunno man, I've been having fun on mine. Ninja Gaiden, Heavenly Sword, The Darkness, Rainbow Six Vegas, still fuck with Madden a bit, Resistance was fun, still fuck with FN4, thinkin bout trying Conan, Ratchet & Clank looks coo, then of course got
Call of Duty 4 comin soon, Bladestorm: The Hundred Years' War looks aight, then Kane & Lynch, Assassin's Creed, Soldier of Fortune, Beowulf all come out in a couple weeks, week after that Drake's Fortune, Medal of Honor, TimeShift. Hella games coming out this winter. I don't know why you hate so much, the games are getting a lot better and a lot of promising games are lined up. But whatever. I'm not into the whole system A is better than system B shit, I got mine for free and enjoy playin 360 at my boys house. They both are tight, no need to bash one over the other, shits lame
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
39
#28
Being a system fanboy is retarded period. Both systems have there highpoints and both have there lowpoints.

If I were to rebuy to start over, I'd consider getting a PS3 because at least you don't have to wait a month at a time to play games while your system breaks every six months.

Masked Lemon, for whatever reason, is so defensive of Microsoft. When someone is trying to find a way to get free live, he attacks him because he doesn't want to pay for it. Why should you have to pay for it? You are already paying 40 bucks a month for internet. Why do you want to pay 5 bucks a month more?

And who cares if he wants to find a way to get it for free? If it works, good. More people could get free Live and stop putting money in Microsoft's pockets.
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#30
pffffffft. great argument, lol

I dunno man, I've been having fun on mine. Ninja Gaiden, Heavenly Sword, The Darkness, Rainbow Six Vegas, still fuck with Madden a bit, Resistance was fun, still fuck with FN4, thinkin bout trying Conan, Ratchet & Clank looks coo, then of course got
Call of Duty 4 comin soon, Bladestorm: The Hundred Years' War looks aight, then Kane & Lynch, Assassin's Creed, Soldier of Fortune, Beowulf all come out in a couple weeks, week after that Drake's Fortune, Medal of Honor, TimeShift. Hella games coming out this winter. I don't know why you hate so much, the games are getting a lot better and a lot of promising games are lined up. But whatever. I'm not into the whole system A is better than system B shit, I got mine for free and enjoy playin 360 at my boys house. They both are tight, no need to bash one over the other, shits lame


Honestly, I could care less... I only post anti PS3 shit on here because it pisses people off, and gets them posting.

If I was to buy a PS3, it would be for the Blu-Ray, not the games though. And that's real talk.
 
Oct 14, 2004
2,782
0
0
45
#31
^^^^^PS3's are having problems. You really are not supposed by the system at launch. You usually should wait a couple months or so. No system has never been perfect right out the gate.

360 is more established with titles then PS3.

Growing up I played all systems. I think that being a fanboy for one system is very lame. Every system that has come out has had great games for it. For Example

X-Box- Halo, Chronicles of Riddick, Jade Empire, Star Wars: Kotor All Good
Nintendo- Castlevania 1-3, Ninja Gaidan 1-3
DS- Castlevania PoR & DoS,
Wii- Metroid Prime 3, RedSteel, an Zelda
X-Box-360- Halo 3, Lost Planet, PGR 3, Half Life 2 Orange Box
PS3- Half 2 Orange Box, Oblivion
Gameboy-(Orginal)- FF, Castlevania, Tetris, Mario
Gameboy Advance (an SP)- Castlevania (all of em), Zelda, Lego Star Wars
PSP-Castlevania
Gamecube-RE 4, Metroid Prime Series
Nintendo 64-WWF VS games, Castlevania, Zelda
Super Nintendo- Castlvania, Super Mario World, Final Fantasy
Playstation 1- Suikoden 1,2, Castlevania, FF7, Breath of Fire III
Playstation 2-Suikoden 3-5, Tactics, Castlevania, FF10
Neo Geo-King of Fighters, Metal Slug
Sega Genesis- Shining Force, Phantasy Star, Sonic
Dreamcast- Tokyo Xtreme Racer 1&2
Game Gear- Shining Force, Sonic
Neo Geo Portable-Metal Slug
PC- Galactic Civilization II, Alpha Centuri, Half Life, Fear
Philips Cdi- N/A
Atari 2600- Boxing, Moon Patrol
Atari 5200- Moon Patrol, Vanguard, Kangaroo, Beserk, Robotron
Atari 7800-Q-Bert and the Ship Racing game (???)
3D0-N/A
Turbo Grafix 16- Splatter house
Master System- Phantasy Star 1

I have played all of these games and owned almost all these systems or played emulators of them. This goes to show that there is no clear cut best system with the best game. Metal Gear Solid 4- Coming for the 360. Devil May Cry 4-360. Only Sony and Microsoft and Nintendo Made games will be left.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#32
I would own a PS3 over a 360 any day. I owned an XBox for about 4 games...and i got the things for next to nothing brand new so it was no big deal.

PS2 was one of the greatest consoles ever made, period. I dont care what folks say, it had so many dope games and almost EVERYONE had one in their home at one point.

I dont do online gaming, so i could give a fuck less about that. The only reason the PS3 gets bashed, is becuase the amount of games at this point. What if PS3 came with as many games as 360 did at its launch? No to mention, you have to PAY for the HDDVD add on for the 360, which, amazingly enough, winds up to be about the same price as the PS3, which already has a BLu-Ray player IN IT.

Also, the backwards compatibility of the PS3>360...only what, less that 3% of PS2 ans PS1 games wont play on the PS3? THats pretty fuckin good.

Only 42% of XBox games can be played on the 360. THAT is lame.

So, for the price of $500, you get not only a game console with ALOT of potential, you also get a Blu-Ray player, which stand alone cost what, the same amount as a PS3 in total? That in itself is a great fuckin deal, end of story.

And alos, i dont give two shits about the rumble feature on the controller...matter of fact i am MORE than happy its NOT there...that shit was SUPER annoying on PS2 games. I had to manually shit that shit off EVERY game i played.
 
Dec 7, 2005
2,874
10
0
39
#33
360 on mine, I rather have my bad ass system with bad ass games break down on me once a year, then have a bad ass system just sittin there with all its "potential" collecting dust, but I'm a gamer so even if I dont like anything sony, eventually I'll get a ps3 when they figure out how to use it's potential but right now $600 is too much for a paper weight
 
Dec 7, 2005
2,874
10
0
39
#35
Actually I was thinking about getting it just for that, the Blu Ray player, I have the HD player for my Xbox and Transformers and my other HD movies look koo as fuck but I heard Blu Ray is clearer than HD DVDs so I might get the PS3 for that and God of War 3
 
Apr 27, 2005
1,405
0
0
#36
Also, the backwards compatibility of the PS3>360...only what, less that 3% of PS2 ans PS1 games wont play on the PS3? THats pretty fuckin good.

Only 42% of XBox games can be played on the 360. THAT is lame.
0% of PS2 games can be played on the newer, cheaper PS3s. But hey, they still play PS1 games!
 
Jan 11, 2006
5,728
1,890
0
45
grouchoweed.ipbfree.com
#37
You can't judge the PS3 based on how the PS2 was. Shit, the PS2 tech wise was the least powerful of the 3 last gen systems. It had the better games because it had the highest user base. This is not the case with this gen. The 360 has 3 times the user base of the PS3, so it's obviously going to have the better games.

I don't buy a games system to watch movies, and I wouldn't use a game system as a movie player anyways, as it adds unneeded wear and tear on the system. But I guess since there aren't many good games out for the PS3, that isn't a problem.



BTW, $279 for the cheapest 360 + $169 for the HD-DVD Player still costs less than the $500 for the cheapest PS3, if you can still find the $500 ones.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#38
0% of PS2 games can be played on the newer, cheaper PS3s. But hey, they still play PS1 games!
THe 80GB's do not have the EE. They use software this time around for that.

The 40 GB's is gone.

Sony wants to focus all its energy into the PS3 in the near future.

YOu act like you cant buy the 60 and 2-GB models still....which you can.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#39
You can't judge the PS3 based on how the PS2 was. Shit, the PS2 tech wise was the least powerful of the 3 last gen systems. It had the better games because it had the highest user base. This is not the case with this gen. The 360 has 3 times the user base of the PS3, so it's obviously going to have the better games.

I don't buy a games system to watch movies, and I wouldn't use a game system as a movie player anyways, as it adds unneeded wear and tear on the system. But I guess since there aren't many good games out for the PS3, that isn't a problem.



BTW, $279 for the cheapest 360 + $169 for the HD-DVD Player still costs less than the $500 for the cheapest PS3, if you can still find the $500 ones.

Cheaper by what, $50? Cmon bro, that aint a huge margin.

Would i use my PS2 as a DVD player? No. WOuld i use my PS3 as a Blu-ray player? Yes. Differnce? One is HD, the other is not.