Powell Confirms No WMD Expected To Be Found In Iraq - FlipFlop?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jun 18, 2004
2,190
0
0
#41
^^^Exactly...
There's nothing to "believe" here...there's only facts...and the most glaring of them is that 1) We went to war, we were 1st told, based on the assumption that Saddam was an imminent threat because of his "stockpile" of wmd...and 2) We have yet to have found any viable wmd (that excludes 50 yr old mustard gas shells).
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#42
TOKZTLI said:
Which WMD? Powell said those will never be found, so why did we invade again?
Powell did NOT say ^^^^

you sure know how to twist words around now dont you.

This is what he actually siad below

TOKZTLI said:
However, Powell said in response to questions from Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, “it turned out that we have not found any stockpiles.”
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#44
TOKZTLI said:
Moreover, Powell said, “I think it is unlikely that we will find any stockpiles.

The job now, he said, was “to go back and find out why we had a different judgment.

. . .

Powell did not elaborate on what he may have thought went wrong.

'CLEAN, sounds like Powell gave up looking for the WMDs, when are you? Since you like to read literal meaning, and accuse me of twisting the truth, read the above direct quotes and make up your own mind. If you can't analyze data and come up with an independent conclusion, don't try to keep up.