It's obamas fault that the endangers species act was created? it's obamas fault that they cant pass something through the senate to get it changed?
It's called EXECUTIVE ORDER! It's a no-brainer. All he has to do is say, "TURN THE WATER BACK ON". The smelt can easily be moved into farms, just like the Salmon were.
Obama cant SHUT DOWN a fucking organization which is NOT ran by the government. If you think a president should have control over private organizations then you're a fucking idiot, move to a country with a dictator if thats how you want to live.
EXACTLY! He shouldn't have control over private organizations, but since they are funded with OUR TAX MONEY, that is funneled through the government, I would think they have every right to stop funding the organization...NOW!
So it's not ok for him to cut ACORN down, but it's ok for him to take control of GM and tell a chairman to step down? Is that right? It's ok for him to gain government interest in other private organizations? Because that's exactly what he has done. If you think that's bullshit, read up.
By the way, stop spouting bullshit you've read else where and stay updated with politics, it's going through the house now to de-fund acorn.
I've been updated on politics. ACORN could have been run through the press months ago. But instead, the bullshit was accepted as "Isolated Incidents".
As hard as you might try, an opinion isn't fact so half of your questions are bullshit.
Tell me where I stated any "OPINION". I stated facts, plain and simple. Read the news, watch the news, pay some attention to what is going on. I asked all of those questions, because every single one of them is an issue RIGHT NOW! Tell me which question is an "opinion"?
And the corporations thing has been addressed by him many times.... but wait a second, just a second ago you WANT government to interfere and shut down a private organization (ACORN), now you're crying that he had to interfere with other ones? Figure out what you want before getting into a discussion.
He didn't have to interfere with any private organization. When an organization is breaking laws though, it is the government's responsibility to step in and shut them down. When we break laws, we go to jail, right? Who puts us there? Government entities. The police, the courts, the District Attorney. So why would it not be ok for the government to knock an organization down for doing the same shit? That's quite different than controlling organizations...that's called law, which the government has every right to enforce. Your argument here is just fucking retarded, plain and simple. Having an interest in GM and major banks is different than enforcing the law when it comes to a severely corrupt organization.
Your valid questions? which are mostly opinion and contradict themselves.... yeah why would I call you stupid?
Again contradicting yourself, "why isnt the government helping california farmers...we dont want to be reliant on the us government"
Again, where did I state an opinion? And where's the contradiction? It's not being RELIANT on the government. All the government has to do is turn the water back on...reverse the ruling that shut the shit off. There is no government assistance required there, just a reversal of a dumb fucking decision to starve people in order to save a god damn bait fish. I'm not asking them for monetary assistance, I'm asking them to use their brains so people can get back in business and feed their fuckin' families.
Your argument is about as good as I expected though. Like I said, come in here, and instead of answering my questions, just attack my character and say I'm contradicting myself...which I clearly wasn't. YOU obviously need to pay more attention and come up with a better argument. Until then....