@ heresy (this is fun reminds me of bacc in the day) a byproduct does not necessitate a related sub product. H2 and O create water but water doesnt have the same properties of h2 or O, the compound creates a whole different "state" (literally and figuratively) of existance. just like you said with the mule, a mule can not mate with a horse or donkey. it cant even mate with another mule therefore it is a totally different species, a byproduct, it also has neither of the efficiencies of its parent species.
NO WATER DOESNT HAVE THE SAME PROPERTIES AS OXYGEN OR H2. HOWEVER WHEN COMBINED THEY FORM WATER. PLAIN AND SIMPLE. JUST LIKE WHEN YOU COMBINE A LION AND TIGER AND GET A LIGER. IF WATER IS NOT HALF OXYGEN WHAT IS IT? IF A MULE IS NOT A HALF HORSE WHAT IS IT? IF A NEPH IS NOT HALF HUMAN WHAT IS IT? A PRODUCT OF INTERACIAL MARRIAGE WOULD BE A BIRACIAL CHILD. YOUR ANALOGY IS FLAWED.
as far as your link. i dont know what you meant by posting it as i said before. therefore i wont speculate.
THANKYOU.
the mysteries werent used to BRAINWASH people into taking it literally, it was the idiots who snooped and pryed into information that they werent ready for who foolishly took things literal and spread misinformation. you should know this, what is the true meaning of the mystery of phoenix? I know.
OK SO ARE THE MYSTERIES "REAL"?????? AS FAR AS THE PHOENIX I CAN SAY REGENERATION ,IMMORTALITY,LIFE AND DEATH. NOT ONLY THAT BUT "WHOS" PHOENIX ARE YOU REFERING TO? YOU MAY GET A DIFFERENT ANSWER DEPENDING ON THE CULTURE.
you should know this, why do you think that ezekiel flipped out about the hole in the wall and the mysteries the priest performed with eating swine and the mouse/rat ? ezekiel himself said for them to keep their mysteries but to recognize yahweh.
AND WHAT DID THEY DO?
WE WILL SEE.
for you to ask me who did jesus baptize means you havent read read the dead sea scrolls and how jesus initiated the disciples into the mysteries. (remember what he said about the baptism with fire not with water, even with the death of lazurus and jesus saying that he wasnt really dead, jesus knew he wasnt dead dead, he was figuratively dead, and jesus wept because lazurus was born again "INITIATED"). how would i know of the gospel of thomas if i wasnt familiar with the coptic writings. what language was it written in HELLO!!!
OK NOW LETS GO BACKWARDS. THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS THAT YOU READ WAS WRITTEN IN ENGLISH. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE *REAL* VERSION AND WHERE IT CAME FROM????? HELLO!!!!! THE COPTIC VERSION (THE ONE THAT WAS FOUND) IS A ****COPY**** OF SOMETHING ELSE.
SO LETS REPEAT. ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE *ORIGINS* OF THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS?
WHEN I SAY JESUS NEVER BAPTIZED I AM MAKING REFERENCE TO *WATER BAPTISM* (NOT SPIRITUAL BAPTISM). DID HE "LACE" THEM ON THE MYSTERIES. YEP SURE HE DID.
sometimes you remind me of bill oriely from the orielly factor, as soon as you feel that someone doesnt know something you try to provoke them by insulting their intelligence or credentials. not that i feel insulted, i just notice the trend you take in your retorts
HEY I TAKE THAT AS A COMPLIMENT. OREILY IS A GREAT MAN AND I HOPE OT BE ON HIS SHOW SOME DAY. I DONT PROVOKE ANYONE NOR DO I INSULT THEM. THEY DO THOSE THINGS ON THEIR OWN ACCORD. I SIMPLY QUESTION WHAT THEY SAY/TYPE.
you asked me to explain something that i doubt that you can why dont you give it a shot. i DOUBT that you can and be correct.
EVERYTHING FROM THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS THAT I HAVE WRITTEN ALL DEALS WITH *ONE* THING. I LIKE HOW YOU TURNED THE QUESTION BACK ON ME. LOVELY.
CONSIDERING THAT THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS IS COMPRISED OF MATHEAN,LUKAN AND MARKAN WRITTINGS AND HAS A SORT OF "GNOSTIC" THEME TO THEM I CAN ANSWER IN A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT WAYS.
SHOULD I GIVE YOU A "GNOSTIC" ANSWER OR A "CHRISTIAN" ANSWER? IS IT TALKING OF A "TANGIBLE" JESUS OR "JESUS THE LIVING" (SPIRITUAL FORCE)? WHAT TYPE OF ANSWER WILL SUIT YOUR QUESTION? THE GNOSTIC ANSWER WILL SIMPLY BE 5 WORDS. THE CHRISTIAN ANSWER 4 WORDS.
I SEE YOU CANT ANSWER QUESTIONS THATA RE POSED TO YOU.......VERY TOUCHING. YET YOU SAY THAT YOU RECOGNIZE THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS.......PLEASE SHARE A SYNOPTIC BREAKDOWN OF.......NOPE. FORGET IT. YOU WILL DANCE AROUND IT (LIKE PEOPLE ON THIS BOARD NORMALLY DO).
a hybrid does not necessitate the product having shared attributes of either of its parents.
I THINK YOU ARE REPEATING YOURSELF. HOWEVER THE FACT REMAINS THE SAME. A MULE IS A HALF DONKEY AND HALF HORSE. A LIGER IS A HALF TIGER HALF LION. A NEPH IS A HALF HUMAN HALF WATCHER. THE MULE DOES HAVE TRAITS THAT ARE EXHIBITED IN BOTH PARENT SPECIES. SO DOES A LIGER.
1. WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH A HORSE YOU CAN DO WITH A MULE.
2.TAKE A LOOK AT THIS LIGER AND SEE HOW IT COMBINES BOTH PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF ITS PARENTS.
http://www.sierrasafarizoo.com/animals/liger.htm
3.THIS LINK WILL HELP YOU UNDERSTAND
http://www.greenapple.com/~jorp/amzanim/crossesa.htm
AND
http://myweb.pacificu.edu/merr8350/hybridprocess.html
4.IF A NEPHILLIM IS NOT HALF ANGEL HALF HUMAN WHAT IS IT? IS IT AN ORIGINAL SPECIES? HOW ARE NEPHILLIMS CREATED? ITS *IMPOSSIBLE* TO HAVE A NEPHILLIM WITHOUT ANGEL/HUMAN SO THERFORE IT IS A "HALF BREED" OR HALF AND HALF.
5.YOU TRIED TO SOUND SCIENTIFIC BY LISTING OXYGEN AND WATER AND WHAT NOT. IF YOU HAVE NO WATER YOU WILL HAVE A LACK OF OXYGEN. THE BODY *REQUIRES* BOTH OF THEM.
http://www.oxywater.com/health.htm READ THAT LINK TO SEE HOW THEY GO HAND IN HAND.
I notice you also take what you wish as literal and what you wish as figurative. I take the text as being fact, and none of it being relevent. all im debating is the text not its relevence or whether it has a truth beyond textual fact
PLEASE SHOW ME AN EXAMPLE OF TAKING WHAT I WISH AS LITERAL AND WHAT I WISH AS FIGURATIVE. ID LOVE TO SEE IT. SO ITS NOT RIGHT TO TAKE GAN EDEN AS LITERAL? I SHOULD TAKE GEHENNOM FIGURATIVELY RIGHT?
YOU TAKE THE TEXT AS FACT BUT SAY IT ISNT RELEVENT? .................................
WHAT *TEXT* ARE YOU DEBATING???????
DID YOU READ YOUR POST?
YOU SOUND LIKE YOU KNOW SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE BEING TALKED ABOUT.......HOWEVER I WILL TELL YOU LIKE I TELL OTHERS...CHOOSE YOUR DEBATES CAREFULLY......BECAUSE IN MY OPINION YOU DONT KNOW AS MUCH ABOUT THE SUBJECT MATTER AS YOU CLAIM. EVIDENCE OF THAT IS FOUND IN YOUR ANSWER IN REGARDS TO THE ORIGINS OF THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS AND THE 4 EXCERPTS I GAVE YOU.
HAVE FUN DANCING AROUND THIS POST AND THE QUESTIONS POSED TO YOU. TOO BAD I WONT BE READING IT UNTIL AFTER MY BIRTHDAY.......I COULD HAVE USED THE COMEDY
:h: