Merged Thread: Payton & Malone to LA

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#82
We arn't going to say anything for an excuse. If they lose they lose, if they win they win. We think they are going to take it so were letting it be known, simple as that.
 
May 19, 2002
4,861
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#84
Yall gotta remember Faker fans think they are gonna win it everyyear, so thats nuthin new!! Also the Rockets nor the Fakers have or had the best 2 guard in the league!! I mean Jordan wasnt on the Rockets back then and Iverson aint on the Fakers now so kill that noise!!! GOT EM!!!
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,134
4
0
53
www.mexica-movement.org
#85
KINGCZAR said:
Yall gotta remember Laker fans think they are gonna win it everyyear, so thats nuthin new!!
IF THE TEAM WOULD OF BEEN HEALTHY THEY WOULD OF TOOK IT THIS YEAR,BUT WHATS DONE IS DONE,WE GOT AN EVEN GREATER TEAM NOW.SO ARE CHANCES ARE EVEN GREATER.LAKERS WERE ALREADY FAVORED TO WIN IT ALL IN 2004 BEFORE PAYTON AND THE MALONE SHIT,SO IT WONT BE ONLY LAKER FANS PICKING THEM TO WIN.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,134
4
0
53
www.mexica-movement.org
#86
MALONE TO KINGS ?

FROM THE SACRAMENTO BEE
  • Mark Kreidler: Let's talk -- Malone is an option
    By Mark Kreidler -- Bee Sports Columnist
    You know, right here on the Third Morning After seems like the perfect time to have the talk.
    Q: Zeus in heaven, not the Karl Malone thing ...



    A: Yes. Absolutely. Karl Malone.

    Q: You've been sniffing paint again?

    A: Actually, I've been watching the Kings a bunch, doing the math, thinking about what Malone would bring as a free agent. And I have to say, adding Malone to the Kings' roster this summer doesn't sound as crazy as it did when I first pondered it.

    Q: Wait, wait, there are a million reasons this is a hideous idea.

    A: Maybe. But you don't get to go first. I do.

    Consider this: Malone wants to stay out West. He wants to play for a team that he believes can win the NBA title either next season or the season after -- but with Malone as a significant reason, not an inconsequential ride-along. The field essentially is the Lakers, Spurs, Mavericks and Kings, and San Antonio

    Q: Riveting.

    A: Stay with me. Let's say that leaves Dallas, L.A. and Sacramento. If Dallas comes up short, Mark Cuban might conclude he's one Karl short of seriously competing for the whole shebang. The Lakers clearly need something, and even if Jerry Buss tries to go cheap, Malone isn't necessarily off the table -- the Kings, Lakers and Mavs all would likely offer Malone the mid-level exception to the salary cap, around $4.5 million.

    Q: Your point being?

    A: My point being this is no decision in a vacuum for Maloof Money Inc. By signing Malone, brothers Joe and Gavin would be moving not only to bring him to Sacramento, but -- perhaps just as important -- to keep Malone from playing for the Lakers or Mavericks during these next couple of years in which a Kings title remains viable.

    Q: Fabulous, inarguable logic, as usual. But you still haven't explained how Malone fits into the picture here. He's a power forward, right? Yet he spent an awful lot of time last season around the perimeter, taking those Karl jump shots. Besides, aren't the Kings knee-deep in guys who do what Malone does?

    A: With 120 victories over the past two seasons and no rings to show for it, the Kings must be knee-deep in something. What it isn't is a player like Malone.

    Sacramento has front-court height, yes, but that's not what I'm talking about. Karl Malone makes shots, draws fouls, converts free throws and runs the floor. He still rebounds very well (he'd have finished second to Chris Webber among the Kings this season). He can play power forward behind Webber, but he also could defend just about any opposing center besides Shaq, which, let's face it, nobody really does.

    Q: Right, but isn't this man 39 years old? What're you aiming for, two or three Kings on the All-Metamucil first team?

    A: He's younger at 39 than Vlade Divac is at 35 -- but, again, we're talking about which picture you choose to see. If the idea around here is simply to get younger, by all means, let's spend more of the Maloofs' money on developing early-in-the-curve talent that could become the next wave of competitive Kingdom.

    If, on the other hand, you subscribe to the window-of-opportunity theory of sports, the notion that a title is sacred and should be pursued with everything a franchise has to pursue it in the incredibly brief period of time it's available, Karl Malone makes sense. He's a future Hall of Famer with a major edge to his basketball personality, with plenty of game left. He takes virtually no guff from any corner. He is unafraid to call out anyone.

    Q: He's a geezer with a crummy temper who yells too much and whines too often, and he's so far past his prime, he needs a telescope to rear-view it.

    A: Put it this way: The Kings didn't exactly hurt themselves this season by signing a 32-year-old journeyman named Jim Jackson, and I've seen Jackson say things to his teammates -- these teammates here in Sacramento -- that'd peel paint.

    Q: Keon Clark. Scot Pollard. Hedo Turkoglu. There aren't enough front-court minutes to pass out as it is.

    A: Clark could solve that problem by opting out of the last year of his contract in the next six weeks or so. Turkoglu lost his reserve role to Jim Jackson at the swing position, which is another place Malone could play if needed. And either Turkoglu or Pollard could find himself packaged in a deal if the Maloofs decide they can't add salary to an already cash-heavy roster.

    Q: If Clark stays, the Maloofs are going to have to bleed green again to add Malone.

    A: Thank goodness it's not our money. Look, the Maloofs will do what they must to stay at championship trim. It's their way.

    Q: Malone won't come to Sacramento.

    A: In fact, he has told friends, associates, coaches and at least two reporters that Sacramento is one of his top choices if he doesn't re-sign with Utah.

    Q: He won't come off the bench.

    A: He says he will.

    Q: He won't play behind Webber and Divac and those guys.

    A: He says he will.

    Q: But there's no way he can get to the all-time scoring record from there. Karl needs to average something like 20 points per game over 100 more games or so to become the leader. He's not going to average 20 for the Kings in this or any lifetime.

    A: You know what? Malone would rather score fewer points and play for a winner than set that scoring record in Ringless Land. He has said so several times already. I'm becoming inclined to believe him.

    Q: Heck, it's a moot point. He'll stay with the Jazz in the end.

    A: In which case, problem solved. Or at least artfully averted. Until then, ask yourself which team you'd rather see Malone playing for next year, the one in Dallas, the one in L.A. or this one here.

    Q: I hate it when you make sense.

    A: Fear not. It has virtually no chance of lasting.
 
Sep 12, 2002
1,857
7
0
40
#87
thats fucking crazy the lakers have hella stars now i think payton just signed with them to get a ring tho same thing with malone trying to sign with them because they are old and about to retire and want to win 1 before they do.
 
May 19, 2002
4,861
0
0
www.cdbaby.com
#88
Yall wouldnt have won shit this past year potna!! Stop makin excuses!! The Spurs stomped yall asses!! Everyone played except for bitch ass Mr. Williams, and that was a plus actually!! Haha!! Nice try though!! GOT EM!!!
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,134
4
0
53
www.mexica-movement.org
#90
THEY SAID ON ESPN RADIO THAT HE HAS ALREADY VERBALLY AGREED TO JOIN THE LAKERS AND IS IN THE PROCESS AND HAS BEEN IN THE PROCESS OF LOOKING FOR HOUSE OUT HERE FOR THE PAST 2 WEEKS.BUT THEN AGAIN ,ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN UNTIL HE SIGNS ON DOTTED LINE.
 
Jul 2, 2002
281
0
0
45
#91
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
yeah always happens, they show up when something bad happens to them, then when something good happens they gotta knock it

the lakers better win a championship with that lineup or else
 
Nov 14, 2002
2,204
0
0
40
#93
Just like I said...we ain't losin' next season. A new dynasty begins. Payton will be signed for more than 1 season f'sho. Malone, if signed, will be only for 1 year most likely. I could give 2 shits what happens to Shaq, but hopefully Kobe changes his mind and remains a Laker for a long time. I'm pretty sure once we win it next season, Kobe will stay to win as many more in a row as we can.
 
Nov 14, 2002
2,204
0
0
40
#94
Re: Payton has agreed to play for Fakers!!

KINGCZAR said:
Looks like Payton will be a Faker next year!! The Fakers are tryin to buy anotha ring, except this time they are payin allstar veterans and not the refs!! Haha!! Looks like Shag & Ko-Me cant do it anymore!! GOT EM!!!
Wha'chu mean "buy" another ring? Since when have we bought a ring? Shaq and Kobe weren't "bought". We certainly didn't buy any role players. This is the first time we've made a big signing in a while (since Glen Rice). Don't hate. I'ma love it after we win our 4th in 5 years. Wha'chu gonna say then? We "bought" it? Haha.
 
B

Blackjack 1577

Guest
Malone now joins tha Lakers

MALONE MAKES MOVE HEADS TO LAKERS







HE'LL BE EARNING THE MINIMUM OF 1.5 MILLION.....NOW HE'S GOT NO CHANCE OF BREAKING KAREEM'S RECORD UNLESS HE STAYS FOR 1 YEAR AND BOUNCES TO ANOTHER TEAM. I GUESS THE CHAMPIONSHIP IS MORE IMPORTANT TO HIM THO.