It seems as though people are pretty firm in their stance on this entire subject. There are but a couple objective people on this entire fight IMO.
Having said that, BOTH fighters deserve the blame for this fight not happening, at various points.
It will take both agreeing and setting their egos aside.
I think Floyd is the better fighter in terms of skill. I think Pacquiao has been the better fighter in terms of accomplishment.
I think this fight is as even as it's ever been ahead of a possible matchup between the two.
I think Pacquiao has done a grip of stuff in his career that pissed me off like demanding large sums of money as a penalty for the opponent missing weight (Morales 3, Floyd). He didn't fight the best possible matchups at times, especially at 147. But what he's done has been incredible and unprecedented. He's an all time great and probably in the top 25-30 fighters of all time. A win against Floyd might put him in the top 15 or higher.
Floyd is great and from a technical standpoint, there have been few better in the history of boxing. His work ethic is incredible. He's marketed himself extremely well and he's one of the smartest fighters I can think of in the history of boxing. I've said for a long time, if he never went above 140 lbs, he might be considered one of the 10 best fighters of all time.
I've favored Floyd in this matchup since it's been discussed. I thought he was too skilled and cautious enough to win a decision. I wrote an article over 4 years ago detailing that:
Manny Pacquiao: Follow This Blueprint and These Fighters Will Beat Him | Bleacher Report
But I feel like it's as close to 50/50 as it's ever been. All the b.s. aside, I just hope it happens.