KLITSCHKO-IBRAGIMOV Feb 23 [Madison Square Garden]

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who will win between these Soviets?


  • Total voters
    13
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#61
Heavy weight boxing is always boring. Glad I watched it Sunday morning instead of wasting a Saturday night on this garbage.

Did you guys see that Irish shmuck they showed on the undercard that might fight against Pavlek. I will absolutely not pay to watch that fight.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#62
early rumors are Irish Duddy and Pavlik are a NO GO after last nights shitty performance, so I have no idea who Pavlik will fight next. Personally I'd like to see him take on Arthur Abraham but probably unlikely since that guy never fights outside of Germany.
 
Dec 18, 2002
3,928
5
0
38
#63
early rumors are Irish Duddy and Pavlik are a NO GO after last nights shitty performance, so I have no idea who Pavlik will fight next. Personally I'd like to see him take on Arthur Abraham but probably unlikely since that guy never fights outside of Germany.
Never seen Duddy before but that cut was nothin nice!
 
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
#64
early rumors are Irish Duddy and Pavlik are a NO GO after last nights shitty performance, so I have no idea who Pavlik will fight next. Personally I'd like to see him take on Arthur Abraham but probably unlikely since that guy never fights outside of Germany.
Pavlik hopefully will go to Germany and fight him. Pavlik, IMO, would punch a straight through Abrahams face.

.. Duddy isn't anything special. Dude gets hyped because he's irish and gets punched in the face a lot and still wins. By most of the shit I've read Duddy should've lost the decision last night.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#67
I think this was a good showing of boxing vs fighting. Klitschko boxed and did a good job of it. Ibragimov wanted a fight and may have won a fight, but Klitschko kept it from getting there with good boxing.

But people in general don't watch the heavyweights for boxing skill they want to bid dudes to fight it out tossing power blows at eachother face to face punch after punch.

I scored the first two rounds to Ibragimov and the rest to Klitschko.
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#69
I don't know if I would qualify slapping down jabs for 3 rounds and stepping on your opponents front foot as good boxing. Clit-sko did a good job of executing an overly cautious, safe game plan. Although even his trainer, Emanuel Steward, wasn't satisfied that he chose the no-balls way of finishing the match without the knockout that was certainly there for the taking. Im sure if the same size and skill advantage were present at a lower-weight class bout, we would have seen a tremendous knockout.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#70
Foot stepping is going to happen in a traditional fighter vs. southpaw fight.

Every time Klitschko opened up and started to fight a little bit Ibragimov would get scrappy and move in to try and score some hits. That was the only way Ibragimov was going to win the fight with the height and reach disadvantage he faced. Both sides knew it which is why Klitschko adopted the fighting style he did for the fight.

If Klitschko would have let that go he would have stood a chance of losing the fight. Sure he could have won that way too, but he also could have lost. Good boxing is what insured his victory I don't see giving up a guarantee for a maybe as wise.
 
Dec 9, 2005
11,231
31
0
41
#71
You're right 2-0...I always get the two brothers mixed up.


This fight went exactly how I expected it to go. Manny Steward is at his best training tall fighters to beat shorter fighters...not entertaining at all, but a job well done for Wlad and Manny.
 
Feb 12, 2008
288
0
0
54
#72
i actually watched like the first four rounds of this fight it was boring as hell. that tall guy didn't throw a right hand until like the fifth round. boringest fight ive ever seen.