dude, I believe in "God" devoid of religious form. i refer to "God" as the Absolute.
your assessment of the US is correct. notice how you just deliniated why I said "Religion" is a hinderance to progress. you just deliniated why I said "Religion" is the toy of mankind.
your assessment of the US is correct. notice how you just deliniated why I said "Religion" is a hinderance to progress. you just deliniated why I said "Religion" is the toy of mankind.
You call people who follow religion "fools" and say that they are using the "toy" of mankind. But there are atheists who think that YOU are the fool and that by believing in God YOU are using the "toy" of mankind.
And if you think that the Absolute is not detached from the universe, then you have even less knowledge than you think you do, and what you believe in is NOT God at all.
as earlier posted. emotions, personalities, and things such as charisma and infatuation are difficult to display in "font fashion" as heresy put it. if you can dismantle the bullshit I portray to attain the realness I may posess you are an adept individual. you should dismiss my "foolishness" as such and see me for what I'm really trying to get at. see the forest.
Anyone who has ever read or listened to me talk knows EXACTLY what I am "getting at". Why? Because I do not speak from behind alternate personas, I do not pretend to have some upper eschelon wisdom which is crytpic and unattainable, I simply speak truth and clarity at all times. No one has to see past any "foolishness", nor do they have to "ascertain" what I am saying, nor do I portray any "bullshit" that they need to wade through. I don't fuck with none of that because it is USELESS. It is a waste of time to not come right out and say what the fuck you mean.
Also, the more bullshit you portray, the more foolishness you indulge in, the more pretenses you use, the more chance that people will think that the REAL YOU is someone not worthy of knowing, and that is why you feel the need to create these personas and fronts. And the more you speak the more it becomes clear that *YOU* are not even certain where the persona ends and the REAL YOU begins.
It's funny your ego allows you to say that I'm an onion being pealed to find nothing. but you say that YOU have found substance in me. not only is that insulting but contradictory. be aware of your OWN words for I am.
Look at it like this. Your body and mind are a shadow. Now a shadow itself has no substance, but when we see a shadow, we know that there MUST be something which possesses substance which is causing the shadow to appear. Your soul is your substance, but you are not aware of it. If you WERE, you would be speaking directly FROM your soul, and you would NOT need to create "layers", and "fronts", or "marketing tools" in order to give off the APPEARANCE of substance.
Would I exist in your mind if you were not aware of me???????? no. OBVIOUSLY haa.
Since you don't exist in my mind, your question is actually "Would you be aware of me if you were not aware of me"? No. Obviously. ha.
(I used to spell gleen glean but i figured I spelled it wrong when winxp office word always corrected it to gleen. another MS bug) Thank you for the PERSISTANT corrections. I finally used another dictionary and found my error LOL
a debate is not a fight. and i gather much from both. your manner is a skill and skills can be learned in anything. but you initialized this thread with an attack. which I am amused at. even now, as I show less "ego" you are increasingly becoming more agressive.
Well this is the written equivalent of that physical disicpline. If I was to pussyfoot around this muthafucka, or hesitate in saying exactly what I felt, then how does that benefit anyone? See you may take this as an attack on you as a person, but actually it is an attack on the FAKE person you pretend to be while on these boards. I am trying to let you know that at your core is a person interesting enough to NOT need to portray some ego-freak.
I'm very aware as you take my kindness for weakness.
how funny. I learn more of you now. must you feel like you have beaten me??? ok YOU WIN I've been beaten LOL.
hail Vyasadeva. he has smitten XianeX through a devisive debate. WONDERFUL. I don't find winning as everything. therefore congradulations you have "Steamrolled" me LMFAO
I have brought it to you ONLY because I know the good that comes from self-realization, and maybe, just maybe, if your ego is chopped down, you might actually realize who you actually are and begin to speak from that foundation instead of some contrived and insincere "portrayal". I know it is not likely, but THAT is why I came at you. I do not care about "winning" anything, I care about truth.
notice the business never personal. you are a trip. I've entertained this charade to see if you were honestly trying to make me aware of a flaw or offense or if you've been using this as a soapbox against me. LOL wow. the audacity.
So this has been kept on a business level, but the ironic thing is that while a "business" is an impersonal thing, there exists no business which was not created BY a person.
You can look at it however you want, but I have made it clear exactly why I came at you. I know that you are presenting a fraudulent appearance, you know that you are, and others do as well. But the point is not just to bash you in the head about it, the point is, WHAT IS THE REASON FOR THE PRETENSE? You say you have knowledge that you want people to come to know, so I am asking you point blank what that knowledge is? I'm not interested in "discerning", or getting past your "foolishness", or deciphering your "portrayal". I want to know exactly what knowledge you have, and that is the business I am speaking of.
the funny thing is this. msmizinkonspiquoz had said to me a long time ago that she found me and heresy alike personality wise. online. but If you ever talk to her about how i am away from the siccness or on the phone she will admit I am NOTHING like this net persona. anybody that has met me outside of this messageboard knows that I treat this like a video game and politics.
for a moment I thought you had a genuine reason for attacking me. sadly I was wrong. but I have appreciate the opportunity to entertain an introspection of how I may need to adjust my methods of getting my points across.
I am certain it is still clouding your rationale and judgement, and is ultimately a detriment. I "attacked" you only to investigate the matter.
you have lead yourself into a false understanding of the person behind the name of "XianeX" in that i feel sorry for you.
Unlike Xianex, Vyasadeva is exactly the same whether online or off. There is no chance of coming to a false understanding of the person behind the name of Vyasadeva because that person does not create alternate personalities or fronts. I am genuine. All I have been trying to see, is whether or not a genuine person exists behind the name Xianex, but I think the truth is that whoever is behind the name Xianex is not even sure if there is one.