Islam
- Thread starter JLMACN
- Start date
Don't be full of yourself, and learn what a logical fallacy is please. I removed what was in my way now that I wanted to add this video to my sig, you really aren't that important and won't be in my sig for too much longer, so stop crying. I stand by everything I said, your entire argument was based on nit-picking. Why I wasted so much time with it? Who knows? 
^^That is the theme! It is a reoccurring strategy of the dim-witted. The JLMACN troll is the worst at hiding this apparent parroting and cheerlead action. Hemp at least thinks he knows what he's talking about, even though he never does. JLMACN is so pathetic that he will admit to his ignorance yet still make entire threads about religion and leave it up to the actual smart people to discuss, since he's so inferior and submissive. What a tangled web we weave.
No my friend I am just great at pointing out truth.
You on the other hand are great at taking a sentence out of a paragraph and completely miss the whole point. This is the "re-occuring strategy of the...." folks in denial. If you dont know enough about a subject, keep your mouth shut (see myself in this Thread, I have not once tried to act like I know enough about this belief to discuss it)
Yet, you on the other hand pretend (Yes, pretend) to act like you know enough about religion, science, history, apnthropology, and every other topic discussed on these boards.....to throw in your 2 cents and all of a sudden deam yourself a professional on the topic at hand.
Be submissive, of powerful Park Boy. If you were that intelligent you would not be on this forum arguing with the "dim-witted, pathetic, ignorant" people such as myself, ThaG, Hemp, and whoever else you feel inferior over.
On a side note: LOL @ you calling me a troll on a board I was at LONNNNGGGGG before you were here. If there is ever a Troll on these boards, it would be you.
Are you seriously trying to take shots at me?
this kid.......
still the joke of the Forum, that will never change Cockton.
5000
You on the other hand are great at taking a sentence out of a paragraph and completely miss the whole point. This is the "re-occuring strategy of the...." folks in denial. If you dont know enough about a subject, keep your mouth shut (see myself in this Thread, I have not once tried to act like I know enough about this belief to discuss it)
Yet, you on the other hand pretend (Yes, pretend) to act like you know enough about religion, science, history, apnthropology, and every other topic discussed on these boards.....to throw in your 2 cents and all of a sudden deam yourself a professional on the topic at hand.
Be submissive, of powerful Park Boy. If you were that intelligent you would not be on this forum arguing with the "dim-witted, pathetic, ignorant" people such as myself, ThaG, Hemp, and whoever else you feel inferior over.
On a side note: LOL @ you calling me a troll on a board I was at LONNNNGGGGG before you were here. If there is ever a Troll on these boards, it would be you.
Are you seriously trying to take shots at me?
this kid.......
still the joke of the Forum, that will never change Cockton.
5000
^LOL!!! What "truth" are you referring to? Laughing at people, making illegitimate cheerleading comments, and backing down from every challenge that comes your way? Hardly, you are in no way a formidable opponent to theism, you aren't even a threat.
^^Which is the point, I've pointed out before that you don't know anything, so keeping your mouth shut has always been recommended concerning you. You never have any insight on anything, I reiterate, you're just another sorry interloper.
^I've never presented myself as a "professional" on anything, in fact, I criticize frauds who pass themselves off as such. What I have attained however, as far as established learning can be easily applied in conversation. You on the other hand, are not learned and seemingly lack the capability to learn.
Intelligent people must entertain themselves from time to time, otherwise they'd go crazy due to the idiocy that surrounds them.
LMAO @ you being a giggly little simpleton. I don't care about your 11,000 posts, that just makes you a long resident troll with 11,000 posts.
No, I'm being honest..
Funny coming from some imbecile with no belief of his own, who appeals to ignorance whenever a debate ensues. The only one laughing is the giggly degenerate above me.. Conversely, you're so retarded that my level of compassion won't allow me to laugh at you..
^^Which is the point, I've pointed out before that you don't know anything, so keeping your mouth shut has always been recommended concerning you. You never have any insight on anything, I reiterate, you're just another sorry interloper.
^I've never presented myself as a "professional" on anything, in fact, I criticize frauds who pass themselves off as such. What I have attained however, as far as established learning can be easily applied in conversation. You on the other hand, are not learned and seemingly lack the capability to learn.
Intelligent people must entertain themselves from time to time, otherwise they'd go crazy due to the idiocy that surrounds them.
LMAO @ you being a giggly little simpleton. I don't care about your 11,000 posts, that just makes you a long resident troll with 11,000 posts.
No, I'm being honest..
Funny coming from some imbecile with no belief of his own, who appeals to ignorance whenever a debate ensues. The only one laughing is the giggly degenerate above me.. Conversely, you're so retarded that my level of compassion won't allow me to laugh at you..
This is your whole problem. I do not try to be a problem to your beliefs, whatever they are today. I am talking about how if HEMP, ThaG, or anyone else proves something (mainly you) wrong, then they are infact RIGHT! I tell them "Hey you are right".....You, Cockton, and whoever else dislike that.
You all can not EVER accept the fact that...guess what....you may infact be wrong a time or 2.
There again. You totally missed my point about your lack of knowledge regarding every topic.
I dont know how you judge Intelligence, but ThaG is most likely one of, if not THE smartest person on this board and you constantly call him stupid, ignorant, etc....
So I take your shot at my intelligence as a compliment.
I never once brought up post count. Yet again, not only do you have selective hearing ability, but you have selective reading ability as well.
You are gifted my child.
Not even talking to you.....selective reading...
Not even talking to you.....selective reading...but I will rebuttal.
Didnt you and I do an IQ test to compare and I was a couple points higher than you. I cant wait to see how you dismiss that.
5000
You all can not EVER accept the fact that...guess what....you may infact be wrong a time or 2.
There again. You totally missed my point about your lack of knowledge regarding every topic.
I dont know how you judge Intelligence, but ThaG is most likely one of, if not THE smartest person on this board and you constantly call him stupid, ignorant, etc....
So I take your shot at my intelligence as a compliment.
I never once brought up post count. Yet again, not only do you have selective hearing ability, but you have selective reading ability as well.
You are gifted my child.
Not even talking to you.....selective reading...
Not even talking to you.....selective reading...but I will rebuttal.
Didnt you and I do an IQ test to compare and I was a couple points higher than you. I cant wait to see how you dismiss that.
5000
LMAO @ the bold print, you'll never figure me out, so stop trying..
Anyways.. Then why is there any need for your comments here if you have no position or knowledge of the subject?
This is what I mean by brainless cheerleading. An apostate like Hemp has been exposed numerous times for his misrepresentation and has refuted nothing whatsoever. Yet you lean on his assertions like they're golden when he's working with the same level of information as yourself. G has abused science and tries naively to apply it to textual sources he doesn't even understand, therefore grasping at straws the entire time, and moving the goalpost. You're not bright enough to see through it, which isn't my fault, you're set in your ways and will fall for anything (that will support your pre-assumed beliefs) apparently..
I don't really care, only exposing your incompetence and inability to tell us why you agree, instead of just agreeing for the sake of agreement.
No one is exempt from wrongness, but cheerleading provides nothing by way of me being wrong, as it proves nothing whatsoever.
This is just ridiculous. This is what I mean by unsubstantiated claims with no reference. Does it make sense for you to make such a claim, seeing as how you continuously admit your ignorance, even when people like me try to enlighten you on it? Then you merely make up imaginary ad hominem fallacies saying brain dead things like this. I never delve deep into things I'm not familiar with, unlike you, who has littered his nonsensical comments all over this thread, a thread that you created.
^Well obviously you're right, you don't know how to judge intelligence. And honestly half of the time I'm only clowning, I acknowledge his foundation in scientific knowledge, however, I have called him out numerous times for being a 1 trick pony. I'm not easily impressed and my vision renders people transparent, I can see through you all.
No, G is smarter than you are, since you're not very well-rounded or versed in anything specific..
Selective hearing and selective reading? When have I ever demonstrated my ability to hear, or lack there of? Anyways, you know what I mean, don't play stupid. I called you a "long resident" troll, so obviously I read everything you typed.
Thank you..
.
Well learn how to quote people..
Well learn how to quote people..
No need to dismiss it. I took 4 different tests proceeding that one and it was one of my lowest scores (122). I took one on international IQ society and got accepted. The requirements for membership is higher than 122, so... I wouldn't try and use a random IQ website as a measuring stick anyways. In any event, good luck with your problems..
Anyways.. Then why is there any need for your comments here if you have no position or knowledge of the subject?
This is what I mean by brainless cheerleading. An apostate like Hemp has been exposed numerous times for his misrepresentation and has refuted nothing whatsoever. Yet you lean on his assertions like they're golden when he's working with the same level of information as yourself. G has abused science and tries naively to apply it to textual sources he doesn't even understand, therefore grasping at straws the entire time, and moving the goalpost. You're not bright enough to see through it, which isn't my fault, you're set in your ways and will fall for anything (that will support your pre-assumed beliefs) apparently..
I don't really care, only exposing your incompetence and inability to tell us why you agree, instead of just agreeing for the sake of agreement.
No one is exempt from wrongness, but cheerleading provides nothing by way of me being wrong, as it proves nothing whatsoever.
This is just ridiculous. This is what I mean by unsubstantiated claims with no reference. Does it make sense for you to make such a claim, seeing as how you continuously admit your ignorance, even when people like me try to enlighten you on it? Then you merely make up imaginary ad hominem fallacies saying brain dead things like this. I never delve deep into things I'm not familiar with, unlike you, who has littered his nonsensical comments all over this thread, a thread that you created.
^Well obviously you're right, you don't know how to judge intelligence. And honestly half of the time I'm only clowning, I acknowledge his foundation in scientific knowledge, however, I have called him out numerous times for being a 1 trick pony. I'm not easily impressed and my vision renders people transparent, I can see through you all.
No, G is smarter than you are, since you're not very well-rounded or versed in anything specific..
Selective hearing and selective reading? When have I ever demonstrated my ability to hear, or lack there of? Anyways, you know what I mean, don't play stupid. I called you a "long resident" troll, so obviously I read everything you typed.
Thank you..
.
Well learn how to quote people..
Well learn how to quote people..
No need to dismiss it. I took 4 different tests proceeding that one and it was one of my lowest scores (122). I took one on international IQ society and got accepted. The requirements for membership is higher than 122, so... I wouldn't try and use a random IQ website as a measuring stick anyways. In any event, good luck with your problems..
^Giggly glee!
Speak for yourself sir.. Same guy that said an earth that has been becoming increasingly round would have been more round in the past, that a spheroid isn't a spheroid, and that the average person has an intelligence level intermediate between an ape and a college professor. Ha! Absurdities that conveniency tends to overlook.
Speak for yourself sir.. Same guy that said an earth that has been becoming increasingly round would have been more round in the past, that a spheroid isn't a spheroid, and that the average person has an intelligence level intermediate between an ape and a college professor. Ha! Absurdities that conveniency tends to overlook.
A mistake due to not reading carefully enough, CORRECTED 12 MINUTES LATER
The exact words were:
1. an egg is typically not a spheroid
2. most eggs resemble a prolate spheroid
Do I have to explain you the difference between "is" and "resembles" or you're a grown folk and you know it
This is hardly an absurdity, it is true
There are plenty of concepts in theoretical physics and mathematics that only a handful of people, sometimes even less than 10 in the whole world are able to understand
And these are often concepts very relevant to understanding the world around us
Believe me, the intellectual level of the average person is as far or even further from these people than an ape is from him. It is such a giant leap in intellect...
The exact words were:
1. an egg is typically not a spheroid
2. most eggs resemble a prolate spheroid
Do I have to explain you the difference between "is" and "resembles" or you're a grown folk and you know it
This is hardly an absurdity, it is true
There are plenty of concepts in theoretical physics and mathematics that only a handful of people, sometimes even less than 10 in the whole world are able to understand
And these are often concepts very relevant to understanding the world around us
Believe me, the intellectual level of the average person is as far or even further from these people than an ape is from him. It is such a giant leap in intellect...
Cop-out.. Firstly you say you corrected it 30 minutes later, then you say 18, now 12? You must be ashamed of this gross error in logic. The point is that you said it..
Again, you're killing yourself while trying to save face. To suggest that an egg is not a spheroid is equally stupid. No getting around this.
No, not really, since it depends on which egg and its frame of reference. Neither does the scripture use these terms "prolate" and "oblate" to describe the earth or an egg so I really got dragged into a straw field. But enough with this nonsense, it's been dealt with ad nauseum.
And this has exactly what to do with standard symmetrical geometry? No need to go off on a tangent..
The ranting isn't necessary..
LMAO @ you sticking by this bogus assertion when the average chimpanzee is known to have the intellectual capacity of a 4 year old. You're insisting that the average mental capacity of the average person is somewhere in between that of Dr. so and so, and a 4 year old! I won't even ask you to give a genetic basis for this claim since it is common sense that you're foolishly mistaken.
Again, you're killing yourself while trying to save face. To suggest that an egg is not a spheroid is equally stupid. No getting around this.
No, not really, since it depends on which egg and its frame of reference. Neither does the scripture use these terms "prolate" and "oblate" to describe the earth or an egg so I really got dragged into a straw field. But enough with this nonsense, it's been dealt with ad nauseum.
And this has exactly what to do with standard symmetrical geometry? No need to go off on a tangent..
The ranting isn't necessary..
LMAO @ you sticking by this bogus assertion when the average chimpanzee is known to have the intellectual capacity of a 4 year old. You're insisting that the average mental capacity of the average person is somewhere in between that of Dr. so and so, and a 4 year old! I won't even ask you to give a genetic basis for this claim since it is common sense that you're foolishly mistaken.
Doesn't mean you didn't type that nonsense and thought it up all on your own. And this is crap, is it not a fact that your statement was completely idiotic and I'm not the one who made that dumb ass mistake?
Wow, G, stop it! Please please, you're exposing yourself right now, seriously. You are full of double talk and distortion.
a spheroid can also be characterized as an ellipsoid having two equal equatorial semi-axes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ellipsoid_3d.jpg
3D rendering of an ellipsoid (prolate spheroid)
Ok, that was me answering you point for point, though I did read what you said and addressed that also. In the meantime, more clarification on your subjective delusions.
Oblate Spheroid (looks very much like a horizontal egg and claims to the contrary are borderline psycho)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblate
I got you..
Um, no, this actually addressed what you said compadre, which you are now avoiding responsibility for your nonsense claim..
Wow, G, stop it! Please please, you're exposing yourself right now, seriously. You are full of double talk and distortion.
a spheroid can also be characterized as an ellipsoid having two equal equatorial semi-axes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ellipsoid_3d.jpg
3D rendering of an ellipsoid (prolate spheroid)
Ok, that was me answering you point for point, though I did read what you said and addressed that also. In the meantime, more clarification on your subjective delusions.
Oblate Spheroid (looks very much like a horizontal egg and claims to the contrary are borderline psycho)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblate
I got you..
Um, no, this actually addressed what you said compadre, which you are now avoiding responsibility for your nonsense claim..
ParkBoyz, don't embarrass yourself further
An egg typically doesn't have two equal equatorial symmetry planes, it has only one rotational axis and that's it
That's why it is an ellipsoid, but not a spheroid, much less a oblate one (where the rotational axis is the shortest)
It is so simple...
this is not fun anymore and it's not even rapage, it is anal masturbation with very long objects
^^Hahaha! In other words..
Here we go with the psychotic nit-picking over the "exact" and "precise" shape of an egg. No, you indeed have humilated yourself immensly and I can clearly point it out as it is even more clear than it ever was since you constantly move the goalpost and contradict yourself.
It doesn't matter, since the relevant scripture merely indicated that he created the earth "egg-shaped", it did not say that the earth is an egg. In any language the approximation of an egg is to that of a spheroid, and it doesn't matter if it's in Arabic or English. Stop the nonsense.
Hahaha! Stop changing the criteria and what you said. You specifically stated that a spheroid is not an ellipsoid, you did not mention an egg. This further alludes to your incompetence. The obslate shape that I posted above resembles anyone's classroom drawing of a horizontal egg.
Obviously not for you...
Only you could come up with such an analogy..
Here we go with the psychotic nit-picking over the "exact" and "precise" shape of an egg. No, you indeed have humilated yourself immensly and I can clearly point it out as it is even more clear than it ever was since you constantly move the goalpost and contradict yourself.
It doesn't matter, since the relevant scripture merely indicated that he created the earth "egg-shaped", it did not say that the earth is an egg. In any language the approximation of an egg is to that of a spheroid, and it doesn't matter if it's in Arabic or English. Stop the nonsense.
Hahaha! Stop changing the criteria and what you said. You specifically stated that a spheroid is not an ellipsoid, you did not mention an egg. This further alludes to your incompetence. The obslate shape that I posted above resembles anyone's classroom drawing of a horizontal egg.
Obviously not for you...
Only you could come up with such an analogy..