I was just thinking about this(about Alien existence)

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#43
2-0-Sixx said:
lol @ calling it pseudo-intellectualism. He's smarter than you and parkboyz combined.
Wow.. LMAO @ 2-0 sixx's blind faith in his personal god, how cute. If you're fooled and buy that, then you also must believe that you are actually intelligent also.:rolleyes: It isn't enough to cockride some lowly white guy, but at least present some of your own credentials, when all you're known for is co-signing, playing the background, erasing threads, and collecting posters of Bernard Hopkins, lol! Coming from someone of your caliber means absolutely nothing, trust me.:cool:
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#45
LMAO @ the loser trying to save face by passing a reactionary and straight forward response, that was in response to sarcasm its self, off as sarcasm. You people can be so fake sometimes..
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#47
2-0-Sixx said:
you still attracted to the lighter shade females comrade?
Yes. I'm not sure why a stalker such as yourself however, would try and apply that here from an obscure comment I made months ago in the open forum. Kind of creepy that you held on to that.

Not sure how that is a contradiction to anything else I've ever said though, so have fun with remembering 5 month old comments of no consequence.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#48
2-0-Sixx said:
I know how you don't like them too dark...
Again, I see that you've edited your comment for clarification, but sexual preference has nothing to do with self-hate, if that's what you're alluding to. If that's all you got on me as far as my "fakeness" though, go ahead and run with it.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#50
^In other words, after being exposed for my superficial reasoning, I've drawn a blank and have no intelligent response, which is why I resorted to nit picking old ass out-of-context comments to zone in on in the first place, in order to cloak my own wishy washyness. So now I'm downgraded to "hahahas".. Point well taken..
 
May 31, 2007
3,992
10
0
33
#56
im sorry but i dont feel like reading EVERYTHING.. but I believe that there has to be other living life SOMEWHERE in the universe.. I mean its fuckin huge. BUT i dont think theres anything the same as us
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#57
ParkBoyz said:
^Random enzyme assembly? I'm not sure how that accounts for the actual information in the cell; DNA and RNA molecules themselves, in the form of assembly instructions.(?) We haven't theoretically accounted for the first living cell and this doesn't bring us any closer, so I have no idea why you posted it.

See: Meyer, S. C. DNA and the origin of life: Information, specification and explanation, in Darwinism, Design, & Public Education (Michigan State University Press, 2003, Pp. 223-285)
1. Links from the DI site do not qualify as reliable sources:ermm:

2. If you don't see what the implications of in vitro evolution of ribozymes are, I will help you:

If Bartel and co. are able to evolve an RNA that catalyzes its own synthesis and many other RNA-based enzymatic activities in a matter of months out of completely random sequences, then what about billions of planets all over the universe during billions of years:ermm:

We happen to live on one of the planets that hit the jackpot. That you don't see the misses is your problem, not mine....
 
Jul 24, 2007
440
0
0
45
#60
ParkBoyz said:
The best explanation is the easiest one to come up with, .
your talking about Achkoms Razor....right...I'm not sure how its spelled, but that sounds like it.

"all things being equal, the simplest explanation tends to be the right one"