Reading comprehension problems, huh? Now read what I said in the context in which it was given. I didn't say you would lose money because of your shitty pictures being used, I *directly implied* that you would lose money if you would go to court because since it's intellectual property YOU would be on your own as far as prosecution and bringing up charges against the offending party. Something which would be a waste of *your* time and money since you probably wouldn't win anyways, idiot.
Yes, you are. Since you obviously can not grasp what I have been telling you.
No shit idiot. I specifically stated this earlier. Moron.
And once again your reading comprehension problem kicks in. Your "point" is moot since I never mentioned any of this.
Once again you prove how subpar your intelligence is. If I take your bullshit pictures and use them I AM protected by "Fair Use" laws. I would *not* need your or any other persons permission to use them.
All I would have to say is that I am using them for scholarly purposes (IE. Homework) and boom, your case suddenly holds no merit. All I would need to do is provide some sort of made up circumstantial evidence or bullshit corroborative evidence. You on the other hand would have to disprove this, which would be impossible with anything less than some sort of confession that I am *not* using your photos for some type of scholarly use.
You fucking idiot. Next time learn a few things about copy right laws and the MANY loopholes one can use to exempt any party from aquiring your permission to use your bullshit.
And I said otherwise WHEN? Please, copy and paste it, I would love to see it.
And this proves what? What I've been saying all along: That we are free from needing your permission to use your bitch ass pictures.
Idiot.