i cant wait
- Thread starter phil
- Start date
I don't think I ever finished my post, I may've come across like I believe that the Iraqi people will not be happy that we removed Saddam from power. That is not what I'm saying, I think they will be relieved that they are freed from his rule. But I don't agree with the way your portraying the "hero" title....
you aint being consistent. you go ahead &
admit that the sanctions were imposed by the
u.s., that they failed to hurt saddam's power
& that in fact they stregnthened his power
by eliminating much of the middle class, widening
the gap between rich & poor & lining his son's
pockets w/ money as he took advantage of
the blackmarket created by the embargo. you
go ahead & admit that saddam was able to further
line his pockets w/ blackmarket oil, due to the
embargo. come on, be consistent.
admit that the sanctions were imposed by the
u.s., that they failed to hurt saddam's power
& that in fact they stregnthened his power
by eliminating much of the middle class, widening
the gap between rich & poor & lining his son's
pockets w/ money as he took advantage of
the blackmarket created by the embargo. you
go ahead & admit that saddam was able to further
line his pockets w/ blackmarket oil, due to the
embargo. come on, be consistent.
^^^i dont get that shit......you seriuosly think saddam would leave iraq......FUCC NO......NO FUCCIN WAY he would leave and our govt. knew that and that's some bullshit that they knew the answer and still pulled out with this shit so they can go head and start bombing......dont get it twisted tho i dont support saddamn he's a bitch and needs to be dealt with
and what the fucc you mean by "NO ONE PERSON ASKING SADDAM TO GET OUT FOR THE SAKE OF HIS PEOPLE".......lol all this time you been saying that he dosent give a fucc about nobody even his own people.......so you believe someone could have talked saddam into leaving iraq?????? HELL NAH........he dosent care if U.S start killing all kind of innocent iraqi's beacuse of him not leaving, he only cares for himself and U.S govt knows that too........i know we need to get rid of saddam but come on mayn come up with some better excuse........you sound like a govt. puppet, repeating everything you hear on TV.
but who cares about what me or any of you all got to say......i mean bush did what he wanted to so i dont know what yall get from all this yapping/typing........but since the wars already started i support our tropps out there because they are the ones risking it all but i still dont agree with what bush and his govts. doing
just my 2 cents......no disrespect to none of yall
and what the fucc you mean by "NO ONE PERSON ASKING SADDAM TO GET OUT FOR THE SAKE OF HIS PEOPLE".......lol all this time you been saying that he dosent give a fucc about nobody even his own people.......so you believe someone could have talked saddam into leaving iraq?????? HELL NAH........he dosent care if U.S start killing all kind of innocent iraqi's beacuse of him not leaving, he only cares for himself and U.S govt knows that too........i know we need to get rid of saddam but come on mayn come up with some better excuse........you sound like a govt. puppet, repeating everything you hear on TV.
but who cares about what me or any of you all got to say......i mean bush did what he wanted to so i dont know what yall get from all this yapping/typing........but since the wars already started i support our tropps out there because they are the ones risking it all but i still dont agree with what bush and his govts. doing
just my 2 cents......no disrespect to none of yall
I think he could have stepped down in the last 48 hours and wed still attack. It didnt matter what he would have done, so we make it look like he caused it all.
Do you think if Saddam would have actually givin himself up a few days ago, that the USA wouldnt attack his country?
@Gizmo, i see it being worse because all of the people that Saddam didnt have control of before will now fight to win the country. The USA will have to pick a tribe to lead like we did in Afghanistan, and that will leave the other groups to start their civil wars. I think lifting Saddams power will only start a new wave of endless struggles for control between the ones who arent put in his place when the war is over.
Do you think if Saddam would have actually givin himself up a few days ago, that the USA wouldnt attack his country?
@Gizmo, i see it being worse because all of the people that Saddam didnt have control of before will now fight to win the country. The USA will have to pick a tribe to lead like we did in Afghanistan, and that will leave the other groups to start their civil wars. I think lifting Saddams power will only start a new wave of endless struggles for control between the ones who arent put in his place when the war is over.
Youre kidding right? The U.S. put sanctions on Iraq knowing damn well that it wasn't gonna hurt Saddam...all it would hurt is the Iraqi people.
What you're saying is the same as Saddam torturing little kids to get information out of their parents...then justifying it by saying, "I'M not keeping them in pain, their parents are for not giving up the info."
What you're saying is the same as Saddam torturing little kids to get information out of their parents...then justifying it by saying, "I'M not keeping them in pain, their parents are for not giving up the info."
bad analogy. actually it only goes to prove my point more.
thanks!!!
what fucking parent would allow their children to be tortured to withhold information? come on dog. i see where you guys are coming from but you still dont admit that saddam had his chance to help those people AND YOU WONT CRITICIZE HIM FOR IT EITHER. BUSH IS TAKING THOSE PEOPLE OUT OF THAT SITUATION AND HE GETS THE CRITICISM!!!! like i said, it requires logic to understand these basic principles here and being liberal means you have forsaken logic.
thanks!!!
what fucking parent would allow their children to be tortured to withhold information? come on dog. i see where you guys are coming from but you still dont admit that saddam had his chance to help those people AND YOU WONT CRITICIZE HIM FOR IT EITHER. BUSH IS TAKING THOSE PEOPLE OUT OF THAT SITUATION AND HE GETS THE CRITICISM!!!! like i said, it requires logic to understand these basic principles here and being liberal means you have forsaken logic.
Actually it was a good analogy. And yes, it does prove your point somewhat (and I actually agree with your point to an extent)...but you're missing mine.
Wrong. I do criticize Saddam for it. I'm not one of those people who refuses to blame Saddam for anything...I support his removal. But youre making it one sided...basically saying that because Saddam is such a horrible ruler, that anything the U.S. does to his people is okay. You asked, "what fucking parent would allow their children to be tortured to withhold information?" A pretty fucking awful one (Saddam)...but that doesnt mean that the torturers (U.S. government) shouldn't be blamed as well.
Wrong. I do criticize Saddam for it. I'm not one of those people who refuses to blame Saddam for anything...I support his removal. But youre making it one sided...basically saying that because Saddam is such a horrible ruler, that anything the U.S. does to his people is okay. You asked, "what fucking parent would allow their children to be tortured to withhold information?" A pretty fucking awful one (Saddam)...but that doesnt mean that the torturers (U.S. government) shouldn't be blamed as well.
i never said whatever is done to his people is ok. why do you think were over there now? i have never once regardless of leader of this nation been opposed to action against iraq. they should have gotten rid of him long ago but words got thrown around too much in the name of peace when all the while it was cheaptalk.