Global Warming Poll

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Is Global Warming a Problem?

  • No. There is no such thing as global warming. It's a scam created by environmentalists to hustle ref

    Votes: 3 9.7%
  • No. Even if it does exist, it's not a major issue.

    Votes: 3 9.7%
  • Yes/No....I don't give a fuck.

    Votes: 8 25.8%
  • Yes, and I support some change or plan to combat its effects.

    Votes: 4 12.9%
  • Yes, and our government should look into radical changes to reverse what damage is being done, and p

    Votes: 13 41.9%

  • Total voters
    31
May 29, 2002
4,310
3
0
41
#21
there is absolutley no proof that global warming exists. Any real scientist will tell you this and by real scientist i mean one that has no politics in mind
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#22
bayGIANTS said:
there is absolutley no proof that global warming exists. Any real scientist will tell you this and by real scientist i mean one that has no politics in mind
lol, are you a scientist? NOOOOOO???? Hmm, provide me some links then that back up your claim and let's make sure their not some scientists hired by some multibillion dollar corporation.

bayGIANTS, it's obvious you have very little knowledge in any scientific area, but please, inform us on how you know that global warming does not exist.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#23
bayGIANTS said:
there is absolutley no proof that global warming exists. Any real scientist will tell you this and by real scientist i mean one that has no politics in mind
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/E9293713-7C79-4F96-81D6-F783EDB83D9E.htm

http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1848/global.html

http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/9707/ElNino.html

http://www.mng.org.uk/green_house/threat/threat6.htm

http://www.msnbc.com/news/106332.asp?cp1=1

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000C9535-EF02-1C5A-B882809EC588ED9F

This link is on methods to fight global warming
http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/smoking_gun.html

http://www.kxan.com/Global/story.asp?s=653159

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/2204756.stm

http://www.ncpa.org/bothside/krt/krt081999b.html


I guess "any real scientist" could be translated as "the very, very small handful of scientists" - possibly .05% or less - who disagree with the theory of global warming.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#25
What the fuck are they thinking with their graphs and charts...REAL scientists never use graphs and charts...only prayer to God, good instincts, and the words of President George W. Bush!
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#26
You're absolutely correct comrade! Graphs, charts, facts. All stupid. "Facts are stupid things." - Reagan.

Use common sense I say.

"Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do." Reagan

We don't need stupid scientities, all we need is our president.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#27
KrypticFlowz said:
Cold Fusion - 1 gallon of water can run a car as far as 300 gallons of gasoline, do a google search and read about it. Underfunded and discovered in 1989 - the power was silenced and reduced as a myth, many scientific studies have provided real direction for this power, but the government gives all of its money to the research of hydrogen instead...

someone invented a car that runs on compressed air, the test model can up to 70MPH
 
May 29, 2002
4,310
3
0
41
#29
I am not saying that there is no global warming, but there is not a serious threat of global warming. I would provide some proof but I am too busy hopping in my diesel truck to go get some fast food. maybe I'll do it later
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#31
It's funny...he says only political scientists tell you it exists...but only Republicans will tell you it won't.

How many scientists worldwide signed the IPCC treaty in 94? 4,000?
 
Jul 14, 2003
461
0
0
#33
the temperture of the world raised by 1 degree in the last 100 years right? well from what ive read itll take acouple more degress to reall make a change in things, and thatll be a couple more centurys, so why are you stressing yourself with shit that your not even gonna be alive to see? your kids wont even be alive to see that shit, so who gives a fuck?
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,856
0
0
40
www.Tadou.com
#34
^^ Because we're all supposed to be mother Hen to earth, and go and hug trees and be nice to everyone, even though life is pointless and there is no afterlife............apparently.

You'd think the Left would use religion as a tool, instead of bashing it to death.
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#35
I sort of agree with tadpole? oh well! (goes to jack off to the doctored Brittany Spears pictures, litter, and use more ozone depleting chemicals)
 
Nov 10, 2002
155
0
0
#36
.Nicoya510:: said:
why are you stressing yourself with shit that your not even gonna be alive to see? your kids wont even be alive to see that shit, so who gives a fuck?
An extremely imprudent and selfish mentality, but one that is all too common.

tadou said:
^^ Because we're all supposed to be mother Hen to earth, and go and hug trees and be nice to everyone, even though life is pointless and there is no afterlife............apparently
What has afterlife to do with the will to preserve nature, and ultimately, life, for future generations? I don’t understand your logic. Life is pointless, but that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t cherish and try to preserve it rather than continue to destroy it at the pace we currently are.

tadou said:
You'd think the Left would use religion as a tool, instead of bashing it to death.
I see no reason as to why religion should be used as a tool when talking about ”environmentalism”. Christianity, for one, is a human-centered religion, meaning that humans are perceived as being above nature (incorrect) when it comes to status, rather than being a part of nature (correct). Human-centered thinking is flawed. ”The Earth is here to serve man; man is here to serve God.” Etc. This is a detrimental worldview because it basically encourages people to exploit nature to satisfy their own needs, and so continue to destroy vital biodiversity. The economic system (and fundamentally, our civilization), based on continuous growth, is also to blame for this mentality.

edit. typos
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#37
tadou said:
^^ Because we're all supposed to be mother Hen to earth, and go and hug trees and be nice to everyone, even though life is pointless and there is no afterlife............apparently.

You'd think the Left would use religion as a tool, instead of bashing it to death.

piss on this fucken turd.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#39
It is already affecting the earth...record heat waves this year up North...record heat waves last year in Europe...and you can quote me on this: The heat will keep increasing. It is not a cycle in which next year it will be dramatically colder. The heat keeps coming.
 
Jun 24, 2004
2,268
0
0
38
#40
WHITE DEVIL said:
It is already affecting the earth...record heat waves this year up North...record heat waves last year in Europe...and you can quote me on this: The heat will keep increasing. It is not a cycle in which next year it will be dramatically colder. The heat keeps coming.


i dont see the day after tomorrow happening? So i dont have to worry about it. Im more concerned with the 2 dollar a gallon gas prices :(