GEORGE BUSH- Irrational or Coldhearted...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#41
Mcleanhatch said:


i tend to see it as a passionate discussion or an inspired debate not as arguing
if u were only to read my articles or read alternative news sources
this whole argruement wouldn't be happening....telling you
mainstream media sucks
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#42
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GEORGE BUSH- Irrational or Coldhearted...

nefar559 said:
its the only way to take care of international disputes...any other way...its against international law.
ya like the way they were taking care of sadamm by not making him allow weapons inspectors for how long now? about 6 years. ya thats a very effecient way of working. if it wasnt for us he probly would already have nukes of other weapons of mass destruction. then all those other countries would be begging us for help
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#43
nefar559 said:


if u were only to read my articles or read alternative news sources
this whole argruement wouldn't be happening....telling you
mainstream media sucks
first off i read many of your articles i mentioned it in another post with you and i just felt that they were radical views.

is there anything in the mainstream media that you do like?
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#46
Mcleanhatch said:


first off i read many of your articles i mentioned it in another post with you and i just felt that they were radical views.

is there anything in the mainstream media that you do like?
There were numerous occasions where, I posted good articles
on this Iraq topic. And no one replied to them, Chomsky views on this situation, and when the CIA released reports saying that Iraq wasn’t a threat…no one replied…I didn’t even get “that’s a leftist radical bias article!!!”....your only argument on anything you disagree.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#47
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GEORGE BUSH- Irrational or Coldhearted...

Mcleanhatch said:


ya like the way they were taking care of sadamm by not making him allow weapons inspectors for how long now? about 6 years. ya thats a very effecient way of working. if it wasnt for us he probly would already have nukes of other weapons of mass destruction. then all those other countries would be begging us for help
"If Saddam is such a threat to the survival of civilization today that the global enforcer has to resort to war, why wasn’t that true a year ago and, much more dramatically, in early 1990? "
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#48
Mcleanhatch said:


first off i read many of your articles i mentioned it in another post with you and i just felt that they were radical views.

is there anything in the mainstream media that you do like?

lets just say, i don't watch the tv for international news...for local
yea....but i do read the latimes, nytimes, washington post, the san fransico cronicoles...and wallstreet whenever i get a chance..
plus i'm a big fan of alternative news sources, indymedia, zmag, alternet.org, International Socialist Review (yea yea yea i know too far to the left)...and of course fair.org, they but the mainstream media on check.

maybe you should try getting u'r news from other sources other than o'oreilly.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#49
nefar559 said:
maybe you should try getting u'r news from other sources other than o'oreilly.
who ever said all i watch is o'reilly.

i watch o'reilly alote but i also watch,

1. hannity and colmes
2. hardball with chris mattews
3. this week (sunday show and very liberal every1 except george will)
4. sheppard smith (g-block)
5. paula zaun mornings sometimes (cause she is hot mostly)
6. rush linbaugh ( but that just for kicks cause he talks out of his ass more than half the time)
7. geraldo rivera (at large)
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#51
Mcleanhatch said:


who ever said all i watch is o'reilly.

i watch o'reilly alote but i also watch,

1. hannity and colmes
2. hardball with chris mattews
3. this week (sunday show and very liberal every1 except george will)
4. sheppard smith (g-block)
5. paula zaun mornings sometimes (cause she is hot mostly)
6. rush linbaugh ( but that just for kicks cause he talks out of his ass more than half the time)
7. geraldo rivera (at large)
LOL, always going off on something small that i said. but since you
have u'r sources,...what about print and/or web material?....
those all are tv shows.. get off the couch..lol
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#52
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GEORGE BUSH- Irrational or Coldhearted...

nefar559 said:


"If Saddam is such a threat to the survival of civilization today that the global enforcer has to resort to war, why wasn’t that true a year ago and, much more dramatically, in early 1990? "
cause as we all know a year ago our hands were really tied up.

and as for the early 90's well what can i say we went in there to liberate kuwait and while we were fighting iraq that little bitch had to go and hide meanwhile his troops were throwing up the white flags which meant surrender and we had to accept and sop his ass got lucky he didnt die. now instead of straightening up he has been growing balls because the UN wont do anything to him and that is why we have to step in again before he does get too powerful. only hopefully if it comes down to it this time we will do the job right this time
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#53
Mcleanhatch said:


1. left wing liberal
2. left wing liberal
3. right wing conservative
4. san francisco must more be said liberal
5. right wing conservative

nice know, how did you figure this out? from u'r tv sources?
i'm serious

what papers are in the middle?
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#54
nefar559 said:
since you have u'r sources,...what about print and/or web material?....
i really dont mess with newspapers unless it at breakfest up town then i will get like the modesto bee or merced sun-star

and as for the web i dont got to much time to be doing all that especially since i hate reading. as it is i get these 400 page text books for classes that i already have to read