You laughed at the textbook definition of homosexuality, so I bet you'd come up with something saying that "homosexual acts are a choice, thus homosexuality is a choice" because that is the only argument you have. If you came up with reputable sources that show you can turn gay through therapy or turn straight through therapy with scientific evidence, then, well, you would be a magician, because you do not have that.
Just like your source from earlier which you didn't cite ("from the journal of abnormal psychology" isn't a valid citation) had the exact opposite results as an American Psychological Association study, http://web.archive.org/web/20040202035152/www.apa.org/releases/homophob.html, "Broken down further, the measurements showed that while 66% of the nonhomophobic group showed no significant tumescence while watching the male homosexual video, only 20% of the homophobic men showed little or no evidence of arousal. Similarly, while 24% of the nonhomophobic men showed definite tumescence while watching the homosexual video, 54% of the homophobic men did."
It addresses the possibility of the "threat condition" which you are so eager to assume is the explanation, which would seem like a decent explanation to somebody who assumes that erections are caused by the increase in bloodflow that results from anxiousness or more specifically, arousal of the autonomic nervous system, without scientific comparison.
Considering that you've already discredited yourself with a blatant willingness to disregard fact and distort the truth, I wouldn't be surprised if you personally altered the data that you quoted, or you picked the most biased source you could find within the APA's Journal of Abnormal Psychology, on the order of the American Family Association propaganda you seem willing to repeat.
The fact that you are so adamant in believing the few extremely-biased Christian scientists over the great majority of rational thinking non-religious scientists about whether or not homosexuality is a choice, makes me suspect that you wish you could choose to be straight.
Once again, your brain:dead: arguments "have no meaning" and rather than provide real evidence when asked for it you play a game, "what are you going to do when I provide evidence?" When you doctor all the evidence, I'll laugh, because you wasted time pretending even though you have zero credible evidence in the face of the scientific community's nearly unanimous reason.
Quit pretending you're a rational human being, you're not. You have illogical biases and you're a slave to them. I never tried to kill myself, and I'm not a drug addict, because quitting was easy as hell and I've been sober for a considerable time now, but you assumed I did and you assumed I was an addict and that my drug use wasn't a choice. Once again brain:dead:, irrational, and above all STUPID. I really thought this discussion was purposeful but you're long gone and almost unbelievably stupid :dead:. Don't waste anyone else's time with your opinions unless you take them to the scientific community because you've been schooled like a child. :dead:
Get help closet-case.
Just like your source from earlier which you didn't cite ("from the journal of abnormal psychology" isn't a valid citation) had the exact opposite results as an American Psychological Association study, http://web.archive.org/web/20040202035152/www.apa.org/releases/homophob.html, "Broken down further, the measurements showed that while 66% of the nonhomophobic group showed no significant tumescence while watching the male homosexual video, only 20% of the homophobic men showed little or no evidence of arousal. Similarly, while 24% of the nonhomophobic men showed definite tumescence while watching the homosexual video, 54% of the homophobic men did."
It addresses the possibility of the "threat condition" which you are so eager to assume is the explanation, which would seem like a decent explanation to somebody who assumes that erections are caused by the increase in bloodflow that results from anxiousness or more specifically, arousal of the autonomic nervous system, without scientific comparison.
Considering that you've already discredited yourself with a blatant willingness to disregard fact and distort the truth, I wouldn't be surprised if you personally altered the data that you quoted, or you picked the most biased source you could find within the APA's Journal of Abnormal Psychology, on the order of the American Family Association propaganda you seem willing to repeat.
The fact that you are so adamant in believing the few extremely-biased Christian scientists over the great majority of rational thinking non-religious scientists about whether or not homosexuality is a choice, makes me suspect that you wish you could choose to be straight.
Once again, your brain:dead: arguments "have no meaning" and rather than provide real evidence when asked for it you play a game, "what are you going to do when I provide evidence?" When you doctor all the evidence, I'll laugh, because you wasted time pretending even though you have zero credible evidence in the face of the scientific community's nearly unanimous reason.
Quit pretending you're a rational human being, you're not. You have illogical biases and you're a slave to them. I never tried to kill myself, and I'm not a drug addict, because quitting was easy as hell and I've been sober for a considerable time now, but you assumed I did and you assumed I was an addict and that my drug use wasn't a choice. Once again brain:dead:, irrational, and above all STUPID. I really thought this discussion was purposeful but you're long gone and almost unbelievably stupid :dead:. Don't waste anyone else's time with your opinions unless you take them to the scientific community because you've been schooled like a child. :dead:
Get help closet-case.
