Nah I'm with you, the media and cops are shady and could make anything up. They are definitely doing a good job of slandering the dude's name. Oral sex from an underage girl now means he's a convicted child rapist. A failed attempt at pimping means he's a pimp, when he obviously wasn't a real pimp. Isn't it technically illegal to have consensual sex even if you're underage yourself? Then almost everyone is a "child rapist". Person of interest means he's guilty and a murderer. They are definitely stretching it to make him look bad, when his background really has nothing to do with what happened.
The gunspotter audio recording of shots, the ballistics, the weapon, a paid "witness" to say he saw the kid fire frist, could all be set up. I'm just thinking that if they wanted to cover it up, they could have done it a lot better. Instead of waiting and delaying, making it look hella suspicious and questionable, they could have just planted a gun and made a story right away. But maybe they were taking their time to get a good story together. Btw the ballistics came back, and supposedly he had some residue on his hand. But why is it taking so long to find his fingerprints on the gun? Seems shady to me, but at the same time if it was a setup, they could just put it in his hands, and say they found fingerprints.