brady vs manning

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
39
#41
Manning is better then Farve IMO.. Manning has such a understanding of the opposing defenses it's ridiculous. He'll throw more TD's then Farve with less INT's. Not to mention he hasn't missed a game so who knows maybe he can get that starting games record too..
i do agree that manning will be CONSIDERED better than farve when he retires but thats a long look into the furture so i wont state my opinion yet
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#42
everyones argument for Brady being better is cuz he has more rings but they have always had the better team so yall do the math. Lol at most of us, theres like 10 people in this thread, get like say 1000 more peoples opinions at least and then you could maybe win the argument and dont say some dumb shit like theres no need to, fact is mothafuckas on this forum dont even make up 1% of football fans.
 
Sep 22, 2007
222
0
0
42
#44
brady got the same weapons this year (Moss, Welker, Stalworth & Watson) this year as peyton had (Harrison, Wayne, Stokley & Clark) when he got his record and brady bout to smash it.
The only reason Brady is beating Peytons record pace by far is because the Pats dont run the ball. Not that they cant but they just refuse to. Also the colts D sucked that year while the Patriots are dominating in all aspects of the game.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#45
SO the criteria for being the best QB is bascially how namy SB's you won and how many weapons you have?

Thats lame as fuck.

I guess Dan Marino sucks, then.

By that criteria, Brady is tied for second best QB EVER in the history of the NFL, while Petyon is only as good as Brad Johnson?

IN case people forget, it takes a FULL team effort to win a SB, not just one PERSON...this aint college football.

NO ONE in the league can call plays at the line and manipulate a game like Peyton Manning....NO ONE. He has ONE SB ring...he can get more.
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#46
All he needed was that one ring, now hes gonna go down as the smartest and best qb ever. Stupid shits act like the Patriots defense never had anything to do with them winning like that one year where they kept smothering the colts receivers in the afc championship and obviously they aint allowed to do it now, them refs love to let the Patriots get away with shit. Espiohti they should never never been in the Superbowl they were a beaten team against the Raiders but the refs decide to pull some shit out there ass.
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#48
Peyton already proved himself in a big game did you forgot the afc championship last year, how much they were down by and came back it dont get much better then that in the playoffs.
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#49
it was not a fluke, everybody knows the Colts are good, a fluke is when a team wins cuz some crazy play happens that wasnt suppose to happen happens. The Colts had beaten them the 2 previous times before that game. Before the playoffs of last year the Colts defense was never really good at all, maybe the season before you could say they had a decent defense. No qb can win a game by himself.
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
39
#50
The only reason Brady is beating Peytons record pace by far is because the Pats dont run the ball. Not that they cant but they just refuse to. Also the colts D sucked that year while the Patriots are dominating in all aspects of the game.
well they only have one kinda healthy running back playin injured and thats maroney and he's been gettin 70 yds a game so there running the ball but there WR are soo dominant that they rarely fuck up in the red zone so its like an automatic TD if they're within 30 yds of the endzone. when sammy morris was healthy he was gettin a shitload of rushing plays for him but he got injured then faulk got injured a couple weeks back so if u were a head coach and only had 1 RB what would you do?
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
39
#52
The only reason Brady is beating Peytons record pace by far is because the Pats dont run the ball. Not that they cant but they just refuse to. Also the colts D sucked that year while the Patriots are dominating in all aspects of the game.

oh yeah and some more proof that they rush and are pretty good at it


there ranked 5th in the league, even more than the colts
 

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,657
0
45
Rich City
#53
I realize that I'm witnessing history and that people will always be talking about the 2007 Patriots in sports, but I also realize that this thread is all opinion. my opinion is manning is a much better qb than brady. that opinion is not gonna change just because someone made a thread about it so everyone else can say how much better brady is or because someone else said got em.
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#54
lol one of the greatest teams of all-time that should have lost to the Colts, yall can go ahead and act like it wasnt a big deal that Harrison didnt play and the Colts settled for 2 field goals inside the 10. I give to the Pats for coming back and winning but if there so good they shouldnt have been trailing like they were.
 

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,657
0
45
Rich City
#56
the colts were down to like 15 offensive players.....you're talking about 2, there's no comparison. any other team that had injuries like the colts this year would have a losing record. besides, most of the patriots injury woes are always on defense, and the way bellicik runs his schemes its like his defensive players are interchangable
 
Jul 12, 2007
208
0
0
37
#57
brady wayyy better than manning and mannings always had the supporting cast and brady makes these recievers look good and he ccarried them there especially the last 3 or 4 years. and look at there record and the way there winning they dont have all star players they ve got an old randy moss wes welker a solid 2nd reciever and donte stallworth who is a a cut away from pullin his hamstring but the guy keeps puttin up the w's regardless