Boxing News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
ALEXANDER VS. BAILEY GOING HEAD-TO-HEAD WITH WARD VS. DAWSON ON SEPTEMBER 8TH
By Ben Thompson | June 25, 2012

According to reports, a deal has been reached in principal for top welterweight contender Devon Alexander to challenge newly-crowned welterweight champion Randall Bailey for his IBF title. The bout will be televised by Showtime and is scheduled to take place on September 8th, the same night that HBO is televising the super middleweight showdown between undefeated champion Andre Ward and light heavyweight champion Chad Dawson. Although a venue has yet to be determined, it makes sense for Bailey to defend his title in Alexander's hometown of St. Louis, where Golden Boy Promotions can maximize ticket sales for the event.

This will be the first of two nights in September when Showtime and HBO are expected to go head-to-head with competing cards. The following week, on September 15th, WBC jr. middleweight champion Saul "Canelo" Alvarez is expected to defend his title against an opponent yet to be determined on the same night, as well as the same city, Las Vegas, that WBC middleweight champion Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. defends his title against middleweight king Sergio Martinez. Alvarez was supposed to be facing former welterweight champion Victor Ortiz, but Josesito Lopez's upset victory over Ortiz put a halt to those plans. Nevertheless, Golden Boy Promotions is still moving forward with their plans for Alvarez to fight on September 15th.


this is why boxing is fuck up why not just have the Alexander vs bailey fight a week earlier it's time for these old school promoters to get out of the business with their old ways of thinking
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
TEDDY ATLAS UNPLUGGED: "A LOT OF THESE STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING GUYS ARE FRAUDS"
By Percy Crawford | June 22, 2012

"I have found in the past that a lot of these strength and conditioning guys are frauds. I have found some of them are good; guess you find that in everything, but a lot of times, some of them are frauds...I do care about the kids in my sport that can get hit by somebody that they shouldn't be getting hit by because of what they have running through their veins, and you're going to allow John Dillinger to go and be your accountant? You're going to allow John Dillinger to go behind the counter and work behind the desk at a bank. No, you're not, so why do we allow John Dillinger, meaning Conte, to walk into my sport of boxing to be in position to possibly do what he has done in the past? Why? Why? Why," stated world-class trainer and ESPN commentator Teddy Atlas, who shared his thoughts strength and conditioning coaches, performance-enhancing drugs, and much more. Check it out!

PC: Another unfortunate situation in boxing is the fact that we've lost two big fights due to positive drug tests for PEDs. You came up in the era where strength coaches didn't exist, and I'm not solely blaming them for the positive tests, but this is a major issue in boxing right now. What are your thoughts on this situation?

TA: I have found in the past that a lot of these strength and conditioning guys are frauds. I have found some of them are good; guess you find that in everything, but a lot of times, some of them are frauds and they get their too fast. They get a good body and a big body and that's not all that we're talking about. How did you get that good body, and is that good body good for a fighter? And the main thing is does it fit into the realm of what we're trying to do with this fighter, with all of the other things that go with training a fighter. Is that a part of his conditioning and his goals for what he's trying to do with that body. And then the way that body is going to react to situations it's going to be in. I've found a lot of guys that don't have the background that they say they have or that they present themselves as, and if they do, it's a standard background with weight training and nutrition, but not understanding, again, how it would fit into a fighter's workout. How it would be a piece to a puzzle and not overtraining them, not hurting them, and not enabling him to do the things he has to do as a fighter; not making him too stiff and not taking away from the dimensions that don't need to be taken away. Just strictly supplementing.

A lot of these guys, they don't have the practical experience and understand how what they are doing fit in there. They just bring what they think is their knowledge from where they are coming from with making the body look bigger and cut, but that's not near the end goals that you are dealing with when you are talking about a fighter. And a fighter being improved and prepared to step into the ring and be healthy on that kind of program. With a lot of these guys, you have to really know what their background was. They come in and most of them are certified, but still they don't have the practical experience to attach to what they knew about just making muscles bigger in some cases. And sometimes, the egos are out of control. You know, they would be talking, "Watch this guy on HBO, watch this guy on ESPN, and watch this guy on Showtime! Watch what I did to his body. Watch how I made him bigger and stronger." But again, was that the goal? Was that the goal of the fighter or was that the goal that he had in his mind for himself. And I've had a lot of bad experiences, and quite honestly, I've stayed away from them if I'm not so sure about them. I just do it myself. I've been doing it for 40 years. I've done pretty good. I've never heard anyone say my guys aren't strong enough or my guy wasn't in good enough condition to do what he had to do and handle the task in front of him. So a lot of times, I do it myself. But…can they be helpful and take something off of your plate? Yeah, if they are the right guy as far as the temperament and his character and his background and understanding how, from a practical standpoint, where he fits in and where he doesn't fit in. He has to be supplemental and not more than that.

But now, with the PEDs, you got a guy like [Victor] Conte. It frustrates me to hear his recent reports basically putting all of the blame on Berto. I'm not saying that these fighters don't have a responsibility; of course they do. We all do and everyone does as a man when you get past a certain age. He is in charge of that part of his training, that part of his nutrition, and that part of the supplementation aspect that's being given to him. And then he's going to go make a statement, "Ah, he must've took something I didn't know about. I didn't give it to him." I thought you were the guy that was in charge of that. I thought you were the guy that was making the charts and making the nutritional program up. I don't understand that. Where did that disconnect come from? And of course, Conte is the guy that has the background we know about with Balco and Barry Bonds and all that stuff.
Again, we have a situation now with Peterson, and again, it's up to boxing to step up in a lot of areas. One of the areas...and I've been yelling a lot about them all for years. I'm tired of yelling them. I am. I am really tired, but I try to use my platform as responsibly as I can because in a way, I do feel like I have a responsibility. I care about the sport and the people that are in it. One area is with the decisions and the judging, like with the Pacquiao situation and all of the other situations and other bad decisions that are tearing this sport apart and hurting the fan base, hurting the fighters and the sport as a whole. That's the structure of boxing that I have been yelling for years has to get better. It has to police itself over. Well, the PEDs, it's the same thing. We don't have testing. We don't have testing for PEDs; very rarely in some states when it's a title fight. But these tests aren't at the levels that they should have to be at to catch these guys with the sophistication and the knowledge they have to be able to use these things and mask these things. The only reason…there is a misconception here. A lot of people and fans said to me, "Teddy, I'm glad to see boxing has stepped up and they are testing and they caught these two guys. It's good and important that they did that." Boxing didn't step up and catch these guys. These guys put their wrong foot in the bear trap. The testing wasn't available, but they asked for it and volunteered it. If they wouldn't have volunteered, it wouldn't have been done. So if anything, it's just a sign that it has to be done and it has to be done across the board on a broader spectrum, in a broader light, and that hasn't been done regularly in all states. And not just title fights, and again, not just available when somebody says, "I volunteer for the program." It looks like it should be a mandatory program because if anything, it shows us that we have a problem. Just like baseball had a problem, just like football had a problem, it's up to us to do something about that problem.

The problem with boxing, unlike the other sports that aren't perfect, is they have structure. They have commissions that can put mechanisms and policies in place, but not in my sport; not in this sport. Boxing, those mechanisms aren't in place, those policies aren't in place, and there is no structure in place. There is no national commission in place. One state says one thing and the other state says something else. At the end of the day, you don't know what you're getting, but the problem is you do know what you're getting and you're not getting anything in uniform or consistent the way you should be getting it. You're not getting good judges across the board, you're not getting accountability for the bad judging, you're not getting action when they're bad judging and enforcement of rules, and again, getting back to the PEDs, you caught two guys. Good! But there are more guys out there and that's pretty apparent now. You have to put policies and programs in place to make sure that you can run with it across the board.

And I think it's much stronger than baseball or any other sport because baseball, yeah, you want to get rid of it because the sport is at risk, but not necessarily the health of the players. The health of the players using it themselves, yeah, that's at risk because of the long-term effects it has, but not as far as the other players who aren't using it. But in my sport, boxing, yeah, because the other guy who isn't using it is at risk. Because instead of hitting a ball further, instead of hitting it 500 feet instead of 400, and instead of hitting 400 homeruns instead of 280, it's got a much more dangerous repercussion. You're hitting somebody's head instead of a ball. The consequences are much different. Instead of Babe Ruth's homerun record or Hank Aaron's homerun record being shattered… and that's too bad for the history of the sport. And that puts question marks next to the history of the sport, and I understand that, but I'm more concerned with the health of the participants of my sport. Again, in baseball, it can only break records and hit balls further. They're not hitting someone in the head with their bat. In boxing, the people that are putting these things in their bodies and they are stronger and faster and they have an uneven advantage, they are hitting somebody in the head, and because of that, we need to be on top of this and make sure we remove it.

PC: I say this all of the time Teddy, only boxing would let someone with Victor Conte's past in with no problem. The NFL would have laughed at him if he would have offered his services to them.

TA: Exactly! Thank you my friend. Thank you! He wouldn't walk into baseball. Pete Rose can't even go into baseball. He is a mortal, but he can't come into baseball. Conte did so much more than that; much more than that. He's playing with people's health with chemicals, and he's going to be allowed with his background and after what he was found guilty of, he's going to be allowed to walk into a sport where those drugs can be put into somebody's arms or somebody's body to be used to batter somebody's head harder and be stronger. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? No other profession. Oh my God! I mean, if you look at the stock market, I don't give a damn about those Wall Street idiots, but even in the stock markets, they don't allow Michael Milken to go down there. He is not allowed to go down there no more. He robbed them of a billion dollars. Bernie Madoff, if he was to get out of jail, he wouldn't be allowed down Wall Street. Even they have standards. They have the FCC and different commissions in place. They have some kind of control on what goes on there. Are you kidding me? The only people that got hurt in those instances are these over-privileged white collar guys that I can give 2 shits about. But I do care about the kids in my sport that can get hit by somebody that they shouldn't be getting hit by because of what they have running through their veins, and you're going to allow John Dillinger to go and be your accountant? You're going to allow John Dillinger to go behind the counter and work behind the desk at a bank. No, you're not, so why do we allow John Dillinger, meaning Conte, to walk into my sport of boxing to be in position to possibly do what he has done in the past? Why? Why? Why? Because people don't give a shit and we don't have the structure. We don't have somebody that says, "No, that's not acceptable. We have to have rules and standards. We have to have censors up. No, you can't work here. You can go work somewhere else that I have no control over, but no, you can't work here." We don't have that, and God almighty we need it.

preach teddy
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
Article Link - http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&opt=printable&id=54344#ixzz1yqdh8A8k

By Rick Reeno

Rolando Arrellano, manager of former welterweight champion Victor Ortiz (29-4-2, 22KOs), informed BoxingScene.com that later today he will send a letter to Golden Boy Promotions to place them on notice that Ortiz wants to exercise his contracted rematch clause for a second showdown with Josesito Lopez (30-4, 18KOs).

This past Saturday night at Staples Center in Los Angeles, Ortiz and Lopez went to war for nine rounds. At the end of the ninth round, Ortiz advised his corner that his jaw was badly broken and he was unable to continue.

According to Arrellano, Ortiz initially broke his jaw in the fifth round and would later suffer a second break, which caused severe damage inside his mouth. Ortiz was starting to spit puddles of blood in his corner and found himself using his glove during several rounds to adjust his jaw.

Ortiz underwent successful surgery, with doctors placing a titanium bar and three screws in his jaw. The recovery time could take as long as six months, says Arrelano.

"He had his jaw broken in the fifth and he fought for four rounds with a broken jaw which is f***ing unheard of. He said that when he would throw punches his jaw would just fall open and he would use his glove to push up against his jaw to keep it shut. The break of the jaw was so severe, because he continued f***ing fighting, that he severed some veins on the inside and it was called internal bleeding. The doctor told us that if we didn't get him to the hospital right away, he could bleed out. What that means is f****ing die from lack of blood," Arrelano told BoxingScene.com.

"He went into surgery and the jaw was broken in two places. There was a double break. The first break and then several punches later there was a second break. They had to put a titanium steel piece of bar in it and three screws in it. I came in and talked to the doctor. The doctor told me it would be wired shut for two weeks and probably about four to six months until it is fully healed. The jaw will be stronger than before because of the titanium."

"Victor wrote down on a piece of paper - 'exercise my rematch clause now.' Today [Golden Boy and Team Lopez] they will be put on notice that my fighter wants the rematch clause exercised. We have a certain amount of time to do so. I will be writing that email later to [Golden Boy head matchmaker] Eric Gomez and it will be conveyed to all of the executives."

Arrelano says Ortiz is in good spirits and looks forward to the rematch. Ortiz believes he was close to knocking Lopez out before the stoppage.

"He said 'I know I was going to knock him out real soon. I felt it, I could see it in his body. The knockout I felt was coming real soon. I got caught. I broke my jaw, I did the best I can. I go back to the ninth round and it just locked open and I couldn't close it or defend it no more,'" Arrelano said.

Because Ortiz's recovery time could take a few months, and Showtime would have to find an open date, Lopez may have the option of taking an interim-fight before facing Ortiz again. Arrelano has no issue with Lopez taking an interim fight - if the rematch is going to take an extended amount of time to put together.

Arrelano also had some choice words for some of the critics out there.

"Most of these people making that conclusion [that Ortiz quit] is based on ignorant facts. Most people do not know his jaw was broken in the fifth round. Most people do not know how severe it was. He kept f***ing going and gave the fans what they wanted. And after knowing all of that, if people still think he's a quitter - I respectfully invite them in the f***ing ring, break your f***ing jaw, cut some vein in the back of your neck and let's see how long you last before going into a complete panic," Arrelano said.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
LOL @ this cuban faggot
are you being serious bro? That cuban faggot would beat Canelo straight up. That's the reason golden boy isn't even mentioning his name. They'd rather have Quintana then Lara! That speaks volumes of how much of a risk Lara is to canelo. Golden Boy promotes Lara, he's one of the best 154 pound fighters in the world and they won't even mention his name as a possibility.
 
Jun 21, 2005
2,876
3,420
113
42
^^^ theres a time and place for that fight. dont you think its too early for it. you know its a business. its a lose, lose for golden boy to do that fight now. as a fan ya, we would all like to see it now..
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
considering the options I think it's a better fight than Quintana or Austin Trout. Trout is kinda risky too but probably a boring fight as well. I think Lara/Canelo would put on an entertaining fight. Not sure about the others, and that's just as important as anything else - entertainment.

Look though, Canelo is a world champion. He is #3 only behind Cotto & Floyd. He's been a pro for 7 years. Lara has been a pro for 4 years. I think the whole Canelo is too young excuse is out the window, I mean he's a seasoned fighter at this point with over 40 fights. If you're a world champion, it's time to fight the best fighters. Even Chavez jr. is fighting Martinez.

Now I understand Canelo has had some bad luck with opponents from Paul Williams to Kirkland to Ortiz. All those would have been great fights. So, why not continue with that trend and pick the next best fight out there? I think it's Lara.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Hopefully Trout doesn't test positive lol.


Austin Trout Would Want VADA Testing For Canelo Bout


by David P. Greisman

BoxingScene.com: When you fought Delvin Rodriguez earlier this month, the talk was that the fight could possibly land you a shot at Canelo Alvarez. What was the talk in the time following about whether that had earned you a shot? Have you been up in the air since then?

Trout: “I’ve pretty much up in the air since then, but they’ve been talking about it still after the fight. In the post-fight press conference, they were asking if I was going to get the fight. I told them pretty much since I didn’t look stellar in my performance that that probably landed me the fight with Canelo. Had I looked great and took Rodriguez out in the manner that I was supposed to, in the manner that I could do, there’d be no talking about Austin Trout-Canelo.

“But I thought because I didn’t have such a great night — I had an off night, in my opinion — that it secured me a fight with Canelo. Then we fast forward and Victor Ortiz gets the fight, I think De La Hoya isn’t stupid and was like, ‘You know what, this kid won’t fight Trout.’ We know what happened to Victor Saturday. I think if I don’t get the fight, it’s because they just seriously don’t want to fight me. Me being in a position right now to get this fight is nothing short of a miracle.”

BoxingScene.com: What was going through your mind when you watched the Ortiz fight? Were you kind of hoping that would happen to him?

Trout: “Well I don’t hope that anybody gets seriously hurt, but I was hoping that Victor lost, and this is coming from a Victor Ortiz fan that watched Victor Ortiz in the amateurs at various tournaments. The only reason why I wanted him to lose because it’d be better for me to get the Canelo fight than him. It was nothing personal, just business. Yeah, I was hoping that Lopez would pull an upset, and God willing, he did.”

BoxingScene.com: It’s not even been 48 hours since that fight, but have you heard anything now about whether you’re back in the position now for facing Canelo?

Trout: “Yeah, I’m hearing I’m back in the picture. That’s what they’re telling me. I’d been in the gym, but that was so much motivation to get back in the gym.”

BoxingScene.com: Are there certain contractual terms they’d be making you accept or that you’d want?


Trout: “They haven’t brought any of that to my attention. I would like the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association to be involved in this fight. That’s one of the things that I would like, as far as my terms goes. And then of course we’re not going to take peanuts for the fight. I got a belt, too, and if they’re offering us peanuts, I don’t see why my belt should be put on the line. To be honest, I probably would fight for free just for the opportunity, but this is a business and I can’t do that, because then I’d probably fight a lot more fights for free.”

BoxingScene.com: Why do you want VADA involved? Is it something specific about Canelo, or something more about the state of the sport right now?

Trout: “Nothing specific. I’m not trying to say Canelo’s on anything or nothing like that. It’s just look how many freaking people have been caught using some illegal substances, people I would have never thought of. It’s just because of the state of the sport. And there’s been no controversy with VADA, as opposed to USADA. I think VADA’s been on their p’s and q’s, and that’s the company I’d go with as far as this fight goes.”

BoxingScene.com: What do you see from Canelo as a fighter?


Trout: “He’s a good fighter. I like his combinations. I like the power he brings. But I feel like my style and the adaptability I have, I have a variety of things I can do, and one of the things I see that’s lacking is his footwork. He’s standing right there, he has great combinations, but when you take that step around, I think he can be neutralized.”

BoxingScene.com: Are you concerned at all that the fight could go to someone who’s been on TV more, like James Kirkland if he’s back in the picture, or Miguel Cotto or somebody else who’s been more in the spotlight than you?


Trout: “I’m definitely concerned, and I can understand and see why they would do that. That has nothing to do with my goals. My goal is to be the undisputed, undefeated champion, and if Canelo has the aspirations of any champion in this game, his goal should be the same. Really, Kirkland and them don’t offer anything that I do, because I have the belt, if nothing else — and I beat his brother. There’s a little back story to it.”

BoxingScene.com: Did you ever talk to Canelo about that after you beat his brother, Rigoberto?


Trout: “Yes. We called him out. We even reminded him numerous times about the revenge that he talked about. After the fight, he came and challenged me for my belt and for revenge of his brother. When he got his belt a month later, he stopped talking about it altogether.

“So yeah, we talked about it. We even sent a press release probably a year ago reminding him that he wants revenge and that I’m more than willing to give him that chance. Now it’s the other way around. He’s giving me a chance at his belt, and I’m going to take full advantage of it. I think he better think long and hard about if he wants to give me a chance at his belt.”
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Boxing legends Lewis, Holmes, and Hagler believe Pacquiao has the edge versus Floyd
June 26th, 2012

By Kristofer Williams Sr. Several of the greatest boxers of ALL TIME were asked this year what they thought if Filipino fighting legend, Fighter of the Decade, 4-time Fighter of the Year and 8-division world champion Manny Pacquiao were to go mano-y-mano with one-time Fighter of the Year Floyd Joy Mayweather.

With no hesitation Lennox Lewis said to ringnews24.com, “Pacquiao would win…I think Manny would have that…edge.”

I’d have to completely agree with the great Lennox Lewis. After all, he was the undisputed heavyweight world champion from 1999-2004. There is no questioning Lewis’ credentials as an all-time great. He defeated future Hall-of-Famers Evander Holyfield and Vitali Klitschko, and knocked out Oliver McCall and the one-and-only “Iron” Mike Tyson. If there’s an expert whose opinion you could trust, it would be Lewis.’ He is well aware of both Pacquiao’s and Mayweather’s strengths and weaknesses after having covered boxing as an analyst and commentator since he retired in 2004, and it seems as if Lewis thinks Mayweather just wouldn’t have enough to handle and nullify Manny’s aggressive fighting style.

Lewis added, “Pacquiao will break you down, break you down, break you down. He’s breaking you down to try to knock you out. He’s trying to impose his will on the person in there with him.”

Lewis hit the nail on the head. He is basically saying that Pacquiao’s style would overwhelm Floyd’s defensive nature. Even Floyd Mayweather Sr recently expressed major concern that his son’s style of potshotting and shoulder rolling may not be enough against a younger volume puncher like Pacquiao because his son is getting older by the minute and with age comes a decline in reflexes, speed, power, all of the above. And the fact Floyd hardly likes to throw more than a one-two combination, it could all spell trouble for Floyd Joy once he decides he’s mentally ready to accept the challenge of fighting the Filipino.

All this overrated hype as a result of Floyd’s mouth and Al Haymon’s marketing expertise and business savvy and Mayweather fanboys and groupies may just as well be disappointed when they finally realize Floyd’s overrated philly shell won’t stand a chance against Manny’s punches-in-bunches. We would all end up seeing a major disparity, with Manny embarrassing the American shoulder roller and giving him a lesson in the true meaning of what it’s like to be in a bloody war.

Not only did Lewis imply that Manny would overwhelm Floyd, but even other boxing all-time greats such as Marvelous Marvin Hagler and Larry Holmes also chimed in and expressed their dismay with Mayweather. The Hall-of-Famer Hagler, undisputed middleweight champ from 1980-1987 and known by most boxing insiders as THE greatest middleweight champion ever, said this year to ESPN, “Here’s a guy (Mayweather) that wants to dictate to another person and wants to tell you what he wants to do. I think Pacquiao is right. Who are you? If you want to fight, let’s fight. Let’s stop all this nonsense.” Hagler then went on to say that he thinks Pacquiao has the advantage over Mayweather.

How can anyone argue with Hagler? If Sergio Martinez thinks Floyd can beat Pacquiao, and Hagler thinks Manny has the edge, I’d most certainly side with Hagler. You cannot argue that Hagler, the Hall-of-Famer, has way more credentials and garners a lot more respect in the fight game than Martinez.

Holmes, widely considered as one of the greatest heavyweight fighters of all time (WBC champ from ’78-’83, The Ring champ from ’80-’85, IBF champ from ’83-’85) who made 20 successful title defenses (which was second only to Joe Louis’ 25), said in a recent interview at Mlive.com that “Mayweather just got a little too scared if you ask me…he was scared to take that challenge. If they never fight, it won’t be Pacquiao’s fault. Every time they came around to fighting, Mayweather put his excuses in.”

Once again, how can you argue with Holmes, another Hall-of-Famer? I know I can’t. Holmes beat Ken Norton, Muhammad Ali, Gerry Cooney, Leon Spinks, and Marvis Frazier for crying out loud. I’m not the least bit surprised that Holmes always thought Mayweather is scared to fight Pacquiao let alone take a risk. After all, Mayweather retired in 2007 at the top of his game while fighting at 154 lbs, thereby foregoing any opportunity to cement his legacy by taking on some of the most dangerous power punchers in their prime at the time – Antonio Margarito, Shane Mosley, Paul Williams, Miguel Cotto, and Kermit Cintron.

Instead, Floyd un-retired for the second time in 2009 to fight Juan Manuel Marquez at a CATCHWEIGHT of 144 lbs when Marquez had never before fought anywhere above 135 lbs. Not to mention his 147 lb bout with Ricky Hatton, when we all know that Hatton’s most comfortable weight was 140, the division where Hatton made his name. Say all you want about Pacquiao’s three career catchweight fights (vs. Cotto, vs. Margarito, vs. Marquez 3), but Floyd is guilty of the same at the welterweight division. To make it fair, when Floyd and Pacquiao were both fighting at featherweight, they took on the best the division had to offer with no catchweight fights.

Perhaps Lewis put it best: “Pacquiao is trying to climb that hill each round, to get further and further, and do damage and knock you out…The thing that lacks with Floyd is that he would rather run around the ring and make you miss and dance around.”

So there you have it. The real experts have spoken.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Sergio Martinez: Mayweather would sweep the floor with Pacquiao
June 25th, 2012

By Chris Williams: The middleweight division’s best fighter Sergio Martinez was asked recently who he thought would prevail in a mega fight between Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Manny Pacquiao if they were to ever fight, and without even batting an eye, Martinez said “Floyd Mayweather is the best fighter in the world,” in an interview at Boxero de Primera. “That’s why I’d love to fight him. Mayweather would sweep the floor with Pacquiao.”

I have to agree with Martinez because he’s a world champion and a boxing expert. He knows what Pacquiao and Mayweather are capable of doing in the ring, and he obviously knows their limitations as well. It looks like Martinez feels that Pacquiao wouldn’t measure up enough to even make a fight of it.

Gosh, and all that hype that has gone on for eons about a potential Pacquiao-Mayweather mega fight, and after all those years, it would turn out to be a sad one-sided mismatch with Mayweather clowning the Filipino fighter. Naturally, I would hope that it would be a competitive fight, but Martinez, the boxing expert, has spoken.

Martinez says Mayweather will wipe the deck with Pacquiao, so how can I argue with Martinez. He’s the best fighter in the middleweight division, and before that, he was the best fighter in the junior middleweight division. Martinez has dried like the devil to get a fight against Pacquiao, but he’s been ignored.

Mayweather, though, says he’s interested in facing Martinez at some point in time, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Mayweather chose to take the Martinez fight in 2013 so that he can hear the applause and adoration from his loving fans for having enough courage to fight Martinez – and without a catchweight handicap that some fighters use to weaken their opponents enough so that they can beat them.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Q&A: Donaire wants to be undisputed junior featherweight champ



by Lem Satterfield
Jun 25th, 2012


WBO junior featherweight titleholder Nonito Donaire wants to be the undisputed champion of his division, a quest he says will begin with an HBO-televised victory over IBF beltholder Jeffrey Mathebula on July 7 at Home Depot Center, Carson, Calif.

A three-division beltholder, Donaire (28-1, 18 knockouts) has his sights on Mathebula (26-3-2, 14 KOs) and then high-profile bouts against the likes of former titleholder Toshiaki Nishioka (39-4-3, 24 KOs), WBA counterpart Guillermo Rigondeaux (10-0, 8 KOs), WBC beltholder Abner Mares (24-0-1, 13 KOs) and perhaps four-division titlewinner Jorge Arce (60-6-2, 46 KOs).

Donaire's accomplishments include knockouts of three-division titlewinner Fernando Montiel and ex-beltholders Volodymyr Sydorenko and Vic Darchinyan in the second, fourth and fifth rounds, respectively, as well as a split-decision over Wifredo Vazquez Jr. and a decision over previously unbeaten WBO junior bantamweight titleholder Omar Narvaez.

Donaire said that Nishioka has vowed to be ringside for his bout with Mathebula, a 5-foot-10 South African on a three-fight win streak.

Like Donaire, Nishioka, Arce and Rigondeaux are promoted by Top Rank. Mares, meanwhile, is promoted by rival Golden Boy, and is coming off a unanimous decision over former beltholder Eric Morel in April.

Over more than a 20-month span through December of last year, the Mexican-born Mares of Los Angeles faced elite oppponents in four 12-round title bouts, going 3-0-1 and overcoming intense moments of adversity in the ring.

During that time, Mares, 26, twice defeated ex-beltholder Joseph Agbeko, earned a decision over Darchinyan and battled to a draw with then-beltholder Yonnhy Perez.

A two-time Cuban Olympic gold medalist, Rigondeaux is coming off a five-knockdown fifth-round knockout of Teon Kennedy on June 9.

Donaire discussed the potential fight with Mathebula as well as his future beyond that fight.

altRingTV.com: What do you know about Mathebula?

Nonito Donaire: Well, he's very tall. He's 5-10 [Donaire is 5-foot-5 1/2] and he's IBF champion. He knows how to box and he knows how to use his reach. We just have to learn how to go around that.

There are a lot of things that we can do, going back to history. You have Ray Leonard who fought the taller guy in Thomas Hearns. Or Floyd Mayweather who fought the taller Diego Corrales.

So we can try to get a little bit of that from those fights. How to move your head to get out of the way of the jab, or, just using basic speed like Mayweather did against Corrales. We're working on a lot of that in the gym.

I think that he will definitely use his height and his length. I just have to get past that jab, and then, once I get beyond that jab, then that's pretty much it.

I think that I can exploit any angles after that and I'll be in my zone. That's pretty much it. No matter what type of style, I've been able to box guys in sparring who are 5-10, 5-11, and we've been able to work with that.

We have a lot of options, but I can't say for certain what type of fight we'll be fighting, because I've never fought a guy this tall or with this much range.

Never fought a guy who is taller than me or who is significantly taller. So it will be interesting. I'm anxious to see what sort of fight that he'll try to make it.

RingTV.com: Will the body attack be important?

ND: I think so, definitely. That's the easiest target. But I'm a head-hunter and I always want the knockout. I'll use the body, sure, because it's there to give me a better chance. I always use what's given to me.

I'll take whatever is there to give me a chance, so, definitely, the body is going to be one of the keys to doing it. But getting beyond that jab is going to be the first thing for me to do.

I don't think that I've ever fought a guy where I had to be the aggressor coming forward throughout the whole fight, but this may be the first time, and I may have to go the distance.

I've always been the counter-puncher or the boxer and backpedaled and used my legs. So this is going to be an interesting fight. It's a territory where I've never been before.

RingTV.com: Are you looking beyond this fight?

ND: Usually not. But we do have Jorge Arce and Nishoka. We have a lot of guys. There's Guillermo Rigondeaux or Abner Mares even. The guys who hold the belts.

My longtime dream has been to become the undisputed champion. So if everything goes well with Mathebula, then we can go and get the WBA or the WBC belt.

RingTV.com: What was your assessment of Mares against Morel?

ND: Morel is not a strong fighter. He's a good boxer, but he stays in front of you as well. He's a little bit older. So altgive him credit where credit is due. But as far as Morel, I don't think that he was on the level of Nishioka and I.

RingTV.com: Your thoughts on Rigondeaux?

ND: That's an intriguing fight because of his accomplishments. But I think that in the pro level, he's very inexperienced. He's never fought a guy like Fernando Montiel or Vic Darchinyan.

I think that even Darchinyan would give him hell if he fought Rigondeaux. So would Montiel. Those guys are just on a different level. But I'm going to aim for that belt, because that's what I want to do.

RingTV.com: Is there an order of preference with these fights?

ND: With Mares or whoever has the belt and is willing to negotiate the fight, that's who I want to fight. I think that a Mares fight is a good possibility.

But I think that the best guy in this division that I want to prove myself against is Nishioka. I think that Nishioka is the better guy of all of these guys.

He's proven himself above all of these guys, and I promised him that I would fight him. So maybe if everything goes well this year, then maybe I can fight him in another fight.

I'm hoping. I did promise Nishioka, but I just definitely, after Nishioka, want to fight guys who have the belt. I've told my manager, Cameron Dunkin, that we want to fight all of those guys. I want to be undisputed.

So if those guys want to fight me, then, please, just hold on to your belts, because I want to come after them. I'm fighting for the IBF belt, and then I want to fight another champion.

altWhoever can make it an easy negotiation, that's who I will fight. If Mares makes it a difficult negotiation, then I'll go with Rigondeaux. If Rigondeaux makes it hard for me, then I'll go with Mares.

So I have my plans, and that's to fight Nishioka after Mathebula. But plans don't always go the way you want them to. I'm eager to fight anybody out there. If everything goes well, I want the WBA and the WBC champion.

Either one of them. I want to accomplish my goal of being the undisputed champion. Before I get to 126, that's what I want to do.

And then, I'm not waiting. I'm going to move up soon after that. I'm not waiting for anybody else, so it's up to them to make it happen.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Muhammad offers help in establishing national commission

Lee Groves
Jun 25th, 2012

Eddie Mustafa Muhammad, former light heavyweight champion and current-day trainer and activist, has never hesitated when it comes to addressing boxing's many problems. When Senators John McCain and Harry Reid introduced legislation last week that would create what would be called the United States Boxing Commission, Muhammad was among the first – if not the first – to offer his services.

“I spoke with an aide to Senator Reid a week-and-a-half ago and with Senator McCain's aide Gavin Parke earlier today,” Muhammad told RingTV.com. “I told them that I am ready, willing, able and available to help regulate – but not over-regulate – the sport of boxing. I know what's wrong with boxing and I'm not afraid to point people out.”

Muhammad's fearlessness is well documented. In his 16-year professional career, he amassed a 50-8-1 (39) record that included a title-winning 11th round TKO over then-WBA light heavyweight champion Marvin Johnson and two title defenses against Jerry Martin (KO 10) and Rudy Koopmans (KO 3). He lost the belt to Michael Spinks (L 15) less than two months after an ill-fated heavyweight foray against Renaldo Snipes (L 10). Other outstanding fighters he faced included Bennie Briscoe (L 10), Eugene "Cyclone" Hart (KO 4), Matthew Franklin (later Matthew Saad Muhammad) (W 10), Victor Galindez (L 15), Jesse Burnett (W 10), James Scott (L 12), Lottie Mwale (KO 4), Tyrone Booze (W 10), Ricky Parkey (W 10) and Slobodan Kacar in his final title try (L 15).

After retiring in 1988, Muhammad began training fighters and experienced similar success. He guided Iran Barkley to two of his three divisional titles by channeling their shared tough New York City upbringings and other titlists he piloted included Michael Bentt, Carl Daniels, Joan Guzman, Danny Romero, Johnny Tapia, James Toney, Paul Vaden and Zab Judah. These days he works with, among others, Ishe Smith, Badou Jack and Hasim Rahman, who at 39 is scheduled to challenge WBA heavyweight titleholder Alexander Povetkin.

But his experiences inside the ring and in the corner only served to exacerbate the sense of unfairness plaguing his chosen sport. Because fighters had no pensions or health benefits, Muhammad teamed up with the Teamsters Union to form the Joint Association of Boxers (J.A.B.).

Muhammad believes his wide-ranging experience would be an asset to the board.

“I'm not a Johnny-Come-Lately in this sport,” he said. “I wake up every day wondering what I can do to help our sport. I have a grasp of what will work for boxing and what won't work. I want to use all my political connections to let them know what's going on and what we should do about it. I want to step into the forefront and help to fix it. What's more, I know how to fix it.”

One major impetus for this move is the urgency he feels about the general state of boxing, which absorbed another major hit following the Bradley-Pacquiao scoring debacle two weeks ago.

“Every sport has jumped over us, and it's not just MMA,” Muhammad said. “The NBA Finals just had one of their biggest ratings in their history. As far as boxing is concerned, nobody's doing anything but talking. We can no longer be content with what is going on and the longer we wait to do something about it the more likely it is that nothing gets done.

“I want to put boxing back at the top because we have the right athletes to put us back there,” he continued. “But what the higher-ups are doing is tearing us down. We once had over-the-air networks rearranging their prime-time schedules just to put boxing on and now we've lost that. Without the networks, boxing has lost its farm system. Now is as good a time to do it again because it's an Olympic year and we can start building back what we had lost. I'm willing to take the lead, but it's up to Senator McCain and Senator Reid (to push this legislation through).”

He has yet to hear back from Sen. Reid's office and he's still awaiting a response from McCain's people. He's not even certain the bill will ever see the light of day, for past efforts to create a national commission have died in committee.

Even so, Muhammad is optimistic that this effort will turn out differently. Plus, he senses that his entreaty is being treated positively.

“I've gotten more confidence from Reid's aide because he directed me to the right people to talk with,” he said. “Anything can happen in politics. We put these people in office because we are asking them to perform a service. Now that we see an injustice we can do something about it.

“I'll take the lead,” Muhammad concluded. “They have my number.”
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Boxing News: Golota faces deportation from U.S.
June 25, 2012 11:55 AM
ShareThis| Print Story | E-Mail Story
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

CHICAGO (AP) — Retired heavyweight Andrew Golota could be deported from the United States to his native Poland. The 44-year-old boxer's case is in court and his wife, Mariola Golota, told The Chicago Tribune that a decision is expected in September.

Golota was a title contender with bouts against Mike Tyson (2000) and two against Riddick Bowe in 1996 that ended in disqualifications for throwing low blows. He also won a bronze medal at the 1988 Olympics.

Golota lives in the Chicago suburb of Northbrook as a legal permanent resident of the U.S., but a criminal background check was triggered when he filed paperwork to become an American citizen.

Golota pleaded guilty in a 2006 Cook County involving a dozen firearms found in his home. Golota's firearm owner's identification card was temporarily revoked at the time.

He also pleaded guilty in Will County in 2003 to impersonating a police officer. Golota was accused of flashing an honorary New Jersey police badge when he was pulled over in the Chicago suburbs.

Mariola Golota said the deportation case is "this big, black cloud that's hanging over our family." An attorney and U.S. citizen, she said her husband is treated more harshly because of his celebrity.

"I'm just hopeful that it's going to turn out OK. It's kind of out of your hands," Mariola Golota said. "Andrew paid dearly for whatever he did. You pay once when you plead guilty and then you pay again, and that's much harsher."

Since his retirement, Golota has appeared in a commercial for the U.S. Census Bureau and on Poland's version of "Dancing With the Stars."
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
PACQUIAO “LOST” HIMSELF UNDER “CONTROLLED POWER”: I HEARD

By Reni M. Valenzuela
PhilBoxing.com
Tue, 26 Jun 2012

This must be mere hearsay.

Having disappointed the fans in his trilogy bout against Juan Manuel Marquez, Manny Pacquiao is in for another fix and twixt that would surely disappoint again his legions of followers upon learning the odd “news” if the “news” are the actual facts.


On November 12, 2011, with all the distractions that bothered Pacquiao, It was a common knowledge that the Filipino sports icon apparently lost himself in a very small place called boxing ring. Pacquiao groped helplessly to find his genuine form all throughout that fight with the Mexican “Dinamita,” yet to no avail. Therefore he yielded much of the rounds to Marquez to “win” the contest by majority decision, courtesy of blind masseurs, of course.

But going into the same ring this time versus the unbeaten but lesser pound-for-pound showman in the person of American Tim Bradley two weeks ago, and Pacquiao having made to believe that he would score big anyway (truly he did except in the “official” scorecards) to run with a convincing unanimous decision, I heard that Pacman deliberately made himself “lost” in a way foreign to the game plan strategized by his team and apart from the knowledge of his chief trainer. How could Pacquiao do such to boxing?

Unbelievable! But what about reading some “unfamiliar” Pacquiao body language during the fight and immediately after “Dessert Storm” was announced the winner?

Since Bradley was considered to be an easy fight for the still vibrant and young 33 year-old Welterweight champion, I heard that few concerned “influentials” privately begged Pacquiao to temper his power and not go all out hitting Bradley with full force of his aggressive instinct due to the possibility that Bradley might not be able to recover from Pacquiao’s fatal left knock-out booms that have battered and broken giants and vultures in just the past three years, straight to the hospitals nearby for treatment and emergency precautionary tests.

On top of that rationale, it was argued that there is no better boxing update which would lure Floyd Mayweather Jr. to fight Pacquiao soonest than the observation that “Pacquiao is on the decline or has declined as a boxer.” Floyd Mayweather Jr. should stay motivated to face Pacquiao even after the Bradley fight but which would otherwise be remotely probable and negate Floyd’s confidence had Pacquiao demolished Bradley “his signature-way,” I heard. Therefore the potentially most exciting and richest boxing match in history keeps swinging and blending good.

Has Pacquiao truly waned in power and skill as the People’s champion?

Or, could it be the “drama” is part and parcel of the grand conspiracy to sell even much more wildly and in wholesale packages to the remaining few equally wild “crazy preys” for the second time as an inept “official peddler” organization soon orders a rematch?

But that one I just thought and didn’t hear.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Canelo Vs Bundrage Being Discussed For Sept 15th On Cbs


By Ryan Burton

BoxingScene.com has been advised by a source close to the situation that IBF champion Cornelius "K9" Bundrage (31-4, 18KOs) is a strong possibility to face undefeated WBC junior middleweight champion Saul "Canelo" Alvarez (40-0-1, 29KOs) on September 15th at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas.

However, Bundrage has to take care of business on Saturday night when he defends his belt against his mandatory challenger, Cory Spinks. If a deal is indeed announced, Bundrage would become the fourth opponent named to face Alvarez. It is likely that Golden Boy Promotions will wait until after Bundrage-Spinks 2, which Showtime is televising, before formally announcing a potential deal.

Showtime pay-per-view is still scheduled to carry Canelo's return, although there has been talk of Golden Boy hoping to place Canelo's fight on CBS.

(SMH..Golden Boy simply will not quit. They announced the Kirkland fight prematurely and it fell thru. They announced the Ortiz fight prematurely and Ortiz lost. Now, here they go again with announcing Alvarez vs Bundrage and Bundrage is scheduled to face Cory Spinks this Saturday. Anything is liable to happen with as crazy a year as it's been thus far. But, I guess out of the remaining opponents from, Lara to Vanes to Molina to Trout. Bundrage is the only one who actually DESERVES a title shot. And, there's an opportunity to unify the titles. Remember they used to do that? The WBC and IBF titles will be on the line. And, with Deaths, Paul Williams being paralyzed, rampant P.E.D. use and Horrible Decisions...I really hope this bout is placed on standard television with CBS. Boxing needs a shot in the arm.)
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
51
It doesn't matter who canelo gets in the ring with...he'll Fuck em up. All the haters gonna eat their criticism soon.
Who is hating on Canelo? He is a very good up and coming fighter and will be one of the best fighters in years to come. However he wouldnt beat anyone he steps into the ring with trust me. Mayweather would outclass and frustrate him. I think Cotto would outbox him and win a decision over him. Obviously Martinez would beat him no doubt. Other than that he would probably beat anyone else that he could possibly fight. So saying that only Mayweather, Cotto, & Martinez could beat him is a compliment in my book. The kid is a damn good fighter but dont act like he is the best in the business because he aint atleast not yet anyway. Got Em!!
 
May 13, 2002
8,039
858
0
38
montyslaw.blogspot.com
Who is hating on Canelo? He is a very good up and coming fighter and will be one of the best fighters in years to come. However he wouldnt beat anyone he steps into the ring with trust me. Mayweather would outclass and frustrate him. I think Cotto would outbox him and win a decision over him. Obviously Martinez would beat him no doubt. Other than that he would probably beat anyone else that he could possibly fight. So saying that only Mayweather, Cotto, & Martinez could beat him is a compliment in my book. The kid is a damn good fighter but dont act like he is the best in the business because he aint atleast not yet anyway. Got Em!!
I was referring to people in general not necessarily right here, but you sure fit the guarache on your foot. Canelo beats cotto, though I agree that martinez and pbf would both be tough, but winable fights for him.