Boxing News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Edner Cherry Returns, Faces Ever Luis Perez in Greeley

By Ryan Burton

Former junior welterweight title challenger Edner "Cherry Bomb" Cherry has informed BoxingScene.com that he will be returning to the ring in a tune up versus Colombian veteran Ever Luis Perez (12-19). The fight is scheduled for 6 rounds and will take place on January 8th in Greeley, Colorado.

The fight will take place at a catchweight of 132 pounds. Cherry has campaigned at 140 pounds for most of his career and moved down to the lightweight limit for his previous few fights. Cherry told BoxingScene, "I will be staying at 130. I made 135 easily and I feel great at 130. This is the best division for me."

Cherry has been out of the ring for 11 months and is hoping a victory will lead to a bigger fight in the near future. Cherry was on the smaller side in the junior welterweight division and is looking to make some noise in the super featherweight division.

Cherry finished up by saying that his fans can follow him on facebook and to check out his website ednercherrybomb.com
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
HBO Picks The Wrong Fighter To Take The Right Stance

By Jake Donovan

To everyone outside of the Pac Nation, Sergio Martinez was 2010’s Fighter of the Year.

It was an honor he earned by facing the best possible opposition and dominating each time out.

Considering his level of opposition over the past couple of years and his plan for 2011 and beyond, it’s quite clear that the reigning middleweight champion of the world has no intentions of seeking soft-touches. Promoter Lou DiBella is even on record bluntly stating Team Martinez is only interested in high profile (and high paying) assignments from now until the Argentina-born southpaw is ready to call it a career.

Given his track record, why has he become the one with which HBO now takes a hard line stance?

With any luck, terms will be finalized for Martinez’ next fight. A date of March 12 has been reserved and he will be presumably facing Sergei Dzinziruk.

As was the case last year heading into the Williams rematch, Martinez has been presented with take-or-it-leave-it stance with the American cable giant.

Forcing the issue for last November’s bout was understandable, though it wasn’t Martinez who needed the ultimatum but instead Williams, who held out for as long as possible before finally putting ink to paper. Of course that moment didn’t come until Martinez agreed to all terms, despite the fact that he came in as the reigning champion.

Nevertheless, it was a fight that had to happen, and neither fighter had any business facing anyone other than each other on HBO’s airwaves.

Martinez-Dzinziruk is a solid matchup. But it’s not a fight that absolutely has to happen.

What does have to happen is that a fighter like Martinez is regularly showcased.

It’s true that for the money offered for any given fight that HBO airs, it’s important that it’s of the highest quality. Such has not been the case in recent years, at least not on a consistent basis.

However, Martinez isn’t part of that problem. In fact, his track record is proof enough that he’s quite possibly the most compliant fighter in the game today.

After receiving his first network showcase in late 2008 (an eighth round stoppage of Alex Bunema), the writing was on the wall that Martinez had a future as an HBO house fighter.

But all that he endured in the months that passed was heartache and hard luck.

His very next fight was a 12-round draw with Kermit Cintron on a night in which he robbed of a knockout and a decision win. After that, he was strung along waiting for a bout with Vernon Forrest to materialize. Injuries and excuses were offered for months, though Forrest’s tragic and untimely murder turned out to be the unfortunate confirmation that the fight would never happen.

If not for Kelly Pavlik bailing out on his oft-postponed date with Paul Williams, Martinez would have gone stale for the remainder of 2009 and beyond.

But the proud fighting solider that he is, Martinez stepped in on short notice, despite having to move up in weight to face a fighter like Williams, already a nightmare for which to find sufficient sparring given his physical attributes.

In a way, his 2010 campaign got off to a similar start. If not for past history, it’s possible that Pavlik and Williams could have come to terms for an April showdown. But rather than run the risk of once again being left at the altar, Williams decided to go in another direction.

Had he not, who knows when Martinez would’ve once again seen prominent airtime?

Realizing it to be the case, Martinez made the most of his opportunity, starting and ending strong to upend Pavlik for the middleweight championship.

Suddenly, a star was born – only HBO was suddenly no longer in the nurturing business.

Instead, Martinez’ loyalty and patience was rewarded with a seven-month layoff and the possibility of no fight at all had Williams decided to sit out the rest of the year.

It was thought that once Martinez knocked Williams out cold that he could finally move on with his career rather than remaining at the mercy of his in-ring rival and accompanying team.

Not so fast, said HBO.

Mandatory challenger Sebastian Zbik was rejected by the network, a decision that’s subject to debate but certainly their right. Zbik – while undefeated – is largely unknown among stateside boxing fans, which HBO believes to translate to subpar TV ratings.

Fringe contender Andy Lee was initially approved by HBO, to where the once-promising Irish boxer pulled out of a guaranteed fight on ESPN2. It turned out to be presumptuous on his part, as the network had a change of heart and without explanation changed the light from green to red.

For whatever reason, undefeated middleweight titlist Dmitry Pirog – arguably the most qualified candidate out there – never entered the equation.

Perhaps it’s a matchup that those involved want to see marinate before allowing it to materialize. But at the very least, the Russian middleweight has earned the right to fight for the lineal championship.

Dzinziruk, while a fine fighter in his own right, has not. All that he brings to the table is no different than that of Zbik – an undefeated record and an alphabet belt.

The last time the Ukrainian has fought in a contracted middleweight fight was more than a decade ago, with sprinkles of over-the-limit junior middleweight tune-ups between then and 2005, when he rose to the title level.

His five-year title reign is commendable, although it only consists of six title defenses. To date, the only credible top ten fighter he has beaten was Daniel Santos, on the night in which his title reign began.

Yet somehow, he became the difference between Martinez fighting on HBO in March or forced to take his business elsewhere.

Given its strong close to an otherwise lackluster 2010 boxing season, it’s understandable that HBO would want to finally make good on a near-decade long promise to change the way it does business.

Its purchasing of Tim Bradley-Devon Alexander and Fernando Montiel-Nonito Donaire is clear a sign as any of their newfound commitment to excellence, as is its insistence that past house favorites will no longer be granted any soft touches.

A message clearly needed to be sent to the boxing world, particularly to many of the fighters the network has willingly spoon-fed for far too long.

Only, Sergio Martinez was never the one to whom it needed to be delivered
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
^^HBO should have tried to force Martinez vs Pirog not Martinez vs Dzinziruk. Dzinziruk is a good fighter and everything but he fights in germany, no one knows who the fuck he is barely even hardcore fans no who he is, has never fought on HBO or SHOWTIME or ESPN and he is a boring fighter to watch, on top of that he's a 154 pound fighter, not a 160 pound fighter.

Pirog on the other hand is coming off the second best KO of the year knocking Daniel The Golden Child Jacobs the fuck out on HBO, is the WBO Middleweigth champion of the world. So it would make PERFECT sense to have him fight Martinez, the WBC and Ring Middleweight champion who is coming off the best KO of the year.

I love HBO taking hard stances but this one leaves me scratching my head. They say they want to compete with the Cotto vs Mayorga PPV on the same night, but again, who the hell knows who Dzinziruk is?? Pirog has a little bit of hype at least just show that KO on repeat people will want to see him again and again.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
WBC PRESIDENT HURT BY PACQUIAO’S DECISION TO FIGHT MOSLEY/Ronnie Nathanielsz

World Boxing Council president Don Jose Sulaiman has indicated he is personally hurt by the decision of pound-for-pound king Manny Pacquiao to defend his WBO welterweight title against Shane Mosley at the MGM Grand on May 7.

The WBC president learned that the fight had been finalized on the same day that the premier world professional boxing organization named Pacquiao as its “Fighter of the Decade.”

Sulaiman told BoxingScene.com/Inquirer in an overseas telephone conversation from his home in Mexico that Pacquiao and his people “were fooling around with the WBC and the others. ”

While Sulaiman stressed “He (Pacquiao) is a hero and I like him very much. He is not paying any respect to the WBC and myself at all. He has never mentioned anything favorable to the WBC.”

Sulaiman said that “at this time of his life he doesn’t care about anything, he only cares about making money I guess.”

The WBC president said that if Pacquiao doesn’t “respect the WBC rules then we have to do something about it” although he admitted “it would make us very unpopular.”

Sulaiman blasted the choice of Mosley saying “he is completely over the hill. He looked very, very bad and very slow in his last fight against a bum (Sergio Mora)” even as he joined a chorus of growing numbers who have condemned the fight and claimed that Pacquiao is only in it for the money.

WBC founding secretary general Rudy Salud earlier said that while Pacquiao had a right to make money after all he has given the country, he “cannot claim that he is fighting Mosley for the country and people. He is fighting for the money
LMFAO^^^^^^
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Jose Soluman is pissed because he wanted Pacquiao to defend his WBC 154 pound belt against Mosley and instead Pacquiao and Mosley are fighting at 147 pounds, which means Pacquiao is defending his WBO belt, which means Jose Suliman doesn't get his sanctioning fee.

So Suliman loved Mosley vs Pacquiao when he thought the fight was for HIS WBC belt, but hates it now that it's for the WBO belt.

Gotta love the slime ball WBC!!!
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
David Haye: "Wladimir is a Coward, I'm Done With Him!"

WBA heavyweight champion David Haye has branded Wladimir Klitschko a 'coward' and fears his hopes of fighting him are now over.

A bout between IBF and WBO champion Klitschko and Haye appeared close to completion for a summer bout earlier this week, but on Wednesday it was announced he will honour his agreement to fight Dereck Chisora on April 30 after a stomach injury forced the Ukrainian out of their proposed clash last month.

"We agreed to a date of July 2 at a venue in Germany with both Sky Sports and RTL and everybody appeared happy with the deal," said 'The Hayemaker'.

"We made a few concessions to remove past stumbling blocks and were happy to do so, as it finally looked like the fight would get made.

"Even through negotiations, though, it was clear Wladimir was looking for the coward's way out. He would often come up with new obstacles and problems to overcome, and I never once sensed he fancied it.

"He refused to come to England, wanted to pick his own gloves, enter the ring second, box out of the red corner and demanded a German doctor. He also wanted his name to feature first on any promotional material ahead of the event.

"We bowed to each and every one of his demands. I didn't want to potentially jeopardise anything this time around."

Although Klitschko has claimed a title showdown with Haye is still on for July 2 despite the Chisora bout, the Londoner remains sceptical he'll ever get the opportunity to fulfill his dream of becoming undisputed champion ahead of his planned retirement before his 31st birthday on October 13.

"It should never have come to this," said Haye, 25-1 (23 KO).

"I was available to fight in May and June, yet Klitschko only gave me dates of April 30 and July 2. The April date would be too close to Amir Khan's next fight, and prove problematic with Sky Box Office, so we settled for July.

"Klitschko claims he'll fight both me and Chisora, but it's nonsense. Are we expected to believe that a fighter who competed only once in the whole of 2009 and twice in 2010 is now going to box twice in a matter of nine weeks?

"A bout with me is the most lucrative, meaningful and dangerous fight Wladimir's ever had, not some throwaway tune-up. Wladimir won't fight anybody nine weeks after Chisora, let alone me.

"I now need to look for a fight of my own beyond April, as Amir Khan has that month tied up with his bout. Presumably Wladimir is expecting me to fight in either May or June and then face him in early July. It's ridiculous."

This latest twist in the Haye-Klitschko saga has angered the Brit more than any other.

"They demanded 50:50 right from the start and we eventually agreed and gave them all they wanted, despite the fact that our side brought three times as much money to the overall pot," said Haye.

"We had venues available for May and June, but Wladimir had no intention of ever coming to England.

"Unfortunately, he claimed he had no venues available in Germany for May and June and that's why we find ourselves in the situation we're in right now.

"If the fight doesn't happen now, it never will. I'm done with the Klitschkos. I know I can retire later this year with my head held high, knowing I did everything in my power to make these fights happen.

"I've had defining fights and beaten the best in the world as a cruiserweight, but, without me, Wladimir can never say he's done the same as a heavyweight
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
WBC: Pascal-Hopkins Immediate Rematch Order Looms

By Lem Satterfield

There could be trouble in store for Chad Dawson. According to WBC President Jose Sulaiman, nearly half of the votes of the WBC's 32-member Board of Governers are in favor of an immediate rematch between Bernard Hopkins and light heavyweight champion Jean Pascal, after which the winner would then meet Dawson.

Hopkins and Pascal fought to a controversial twelve round draw on December 18 at the Pepsi Coliseum in Quebec, Canada. Pascal is contractually obligated to face Dawson next. The Dawson rematch stems from a contract clause in their original bout agreement. Pascal won an eleven round techincal decision over Dawson last year.

Initially, it appeared that the WBC would support the Pascal's contractual obligation to Dawson. But as of mid-day on Wednesday, 13 of 14 voters favored over-ruling the contractual rematch between Pascal and Dawson in favor of a return bout between Pascal and Hopkins, whose victor would then defend the belt against Dawson, the WBC's former interim titlist.

"The total voting here has not been received yet. But the great majority is asking for Pascal and Hopkins, with the winner fighting Chad Dawson. That's the voting that we have been receiving the most of from about 35 percent of those who have voted, that's how it is going right now," said Sulaiman.

"We expect to get the rest of them by the end of this week because we've received approximately 13 votes in favor of the Pascal rematch with Hopkins. Everyone agrees that it was a great match, and they would like to see rematch, and that they both deserve that fight. Only one has voted for Dawson to get the rematch first."

Gary Shaw, Dawson's promoter, said that the WBC's voting was moot.

"They can vote all that they want. I have a contract that allowed for Pascal to have one interim fight after ours, and he fought Bernard Hopkins. And then, he would have to do the rematch with us," said Shaw.

"I just have to get a date from HBO, and that's all that I have to do. My comment is that we have a contract to fight Pascal, and I'm waiting for [promoter] Yvon Michel to tell me when Jean Pascal will be ready to fight. And then, I'll go to HBO and talk to them about a date and money."
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
I want to fight Miguel Angel Cotto or Shane Mosley

By Francisco Hernandez: One way to tell when a fighter is easy pickings is when you start hearing other fighters say: I want to fight Cotto, I want to fight Mosley, I want to fight Margarito. Everybody from Julio Cesar Chavez Junior, Canelo Alvarez, Andre Berto, and many others can be heard calling out Miguel Cotto and Shane Mosley. When interviewed and asked: who do you want to fight? They respond, Cotto, Mosley. When Marco Antonio Barrera was old and no longer in shape to fight, Amir Khan would call him out. Yet when these now decaying fighters were in their prime, not so many were willing to call them out for a fight. Manny Pacquiao fled from Mosley like he was the devil. Oscar de la Hoya hid from Antonio Margarito for many years. These now moribund fighters who are now easy pickings built their name recognition because of a knack for fighting anyone; they didn’t run from challenges, that’s why real fans respected them, Shane Mosley, Antonio Margarito, Miguel Cotto, they fought anyone.


Fans should ask themselves this question: does beating one of these faded, decaying warriors, transfer the status of their legacy in the ring to me. If I beat the hell out of an aged Mosley, does that mean Mosley’s accomplishments are now transferred to my name? Of course not, to think that way is a superstition, like the cannibals who believe that if you eat the heart of your enemy his power will be transferred to you. Did Amir Khan prove anything by being declared the winner after head butting the smaller and faded semi-retired Marco Antonio Barrera? I don’t think so. Has Manny Pacquiao proved anything by winning against bum steers who in their prime would have taken his head off? I don’t think so.

If it wasn’t so sad, it would be funny, hearing how everyone now is calling out Miguel Angel Cotto, and Shane Mosley. They will be doing the same to Juan Manuel Marquez as the inevitable decline takes hold on him, although when he was in his prime he was paid not to fight because he was too good. Boxing would be a lot better if instead of trying to finish off old and battle worn warriors, these young fighters fought each other. These younger fighters should imitate these old warriors; not seek easy fights against them.

Manny Pacquiao please be a man and fight Alfredo Angulo, Andre Berto, Marcos Maidana, Sergio Martinez. Amir Khan you need to grow some marbles and face Canelo Alvarez in the Welterweights or Victor Ortiz in the junior middleweights. Julio Cesar Chavez junior your fans think you should face Paul Williams, Sergio Martinez, and the dangerous Russian Dmitry Pirog.

You tell me you want to face an old or faded guy who was a legend, because that way you will appear bigger than you really are? That is a superstition, it has never worked, Butterbean beat a fifty year old Larry Holmes, but does anyone believe Butterbean was a great boxer. Do you think anyone remembers all the palookas that beat Julio Cesar Chavez when he was a tired and worn out man, who was fighting smokers just to keep from being sued by promoters? I don’t think so. The media glitz may have all the poor fools believing that these guys are the best thing since peanut butter was invented, but eventually truth will prevail, and these useless fighters will be forgotten. The real legends, the greats like Salvador Sanchez, Roberto Duran, Thomas Hearns, Sugar Ray Robinson, they are eternal.

Share and Enjoy:
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Judah-Victor Ortiz Possible if Kaizer Mabuza Bails

By Rick Reeno

An interesting situation is brewing with the vacant IBF junior welterweight title. Last Thursday, Main Events won a scheduled purse bid at the IBF's headquarters in New Jersey, for the right to stage a fight between Zab Judah and Kaizer Mabuza of South Africa. The two boxers will battle for the organization's vacant 140-pound title.

Kathy Duva, CEO of Main Events and promoter of Judah, place in a winning bid of $50,000. Mabuza's promoter Branco Milenkovic, of South Africa, put in a bid but it was disqualified by the IBF. According to the IBF rules, all bids have to be delivered personally or by courier. Milenkovic's travel plans were cut short when a winter storm crippled the East Coast and most of the surrounding airports were shut down.

According to Branco, his bid was more than double of the $50,000 placed in by Main Events. He placed in his bid by email, which the IBF threw out in accordance to their rule book.

There are heavy rumors going around that Mabuza will not accept the fight because of his unhappiness with the way the purse bid played out. If Mabuza walks away, the IBF would likely order Judah to face Victor Ortiz, the next available contender. Mabuza has until January 14 to sign a contract.

Eric Gomez, head matchmaker at Golden Boy Promotions, has heard the rumors regarding Mabuza's possible withdrawal from the fight. In light of those rumors, Golden Boy is keeping Ortiz available until the Judah-Mabuza situation plays out.

"Mabuza has until January 14th to sign a contract. There is a possibility that Mabuza will not come over to fight Zab Judah for the vacant title. If for whatever reason Mabuza doesn't take the fight with Judah, then the next guy in line is Victor Ortiz. We're going to wait that out and see what happens there. We can do Victor and Zab Judah for the vacant title and that's something that we're interested in," Gomez told BoxingScene.com.
 
Jul 24, 2005
12,836
2,137
0
45
Wladimir Klitschko, David Haye: Who is To Blame

By Terence Dooley

After assurances from both sides that the contest was practically a done deal, the proposed fight between WBA heavyweight title-holder and IBO, IBF and WBO boss Wlad Klitschko has against fallen by the wayside in the wake of Wlad's announcement that he will accommodate Derek 'Del Boy' Chisora and Haye's proclamation that he is no longer prepared to deal with either of the two Klitschkos.

The relationship between Haye and Wlad has been very much like a doomed marriage, minus the fist fights, and it would appear that this on-off relationship is going to be annulled before its consummation. Haye last night declared that he had been prepared to accept a July 2nd meeting with Wlad only for the younger Klitschko to nix the deal by signing on to fight Chisora on April 30th.

“We agreed to a date of July 2 at a venue in Germany with both Sky Sports and RTL and everybody appeared happy with the deal,” revealed Haye. “We made a few concessions to remove past stumbling blocks and were happy to do so, as it finally looked like the fight would get made. Even through negotiations, though, it was clear Wladimir was looking for the coward's way out. He would often come up with new obstacles and problems to overcome, and I never once sensed he fancied it. He refused to come to England, wanted to pick his own gloves, enter the ring second, box out of the red corner and demanded a German doctor. He also wanted his name to feature first on any promotional material ahead of the event.”

Wlad insists that he can accommodate both Derek and Haye; Haye disagrees, pointing out that Wlad only fought twice last year and would be facing two fights in nine weeks, the 30-year-old also believes that it is unfair of Wlad to expect him to remain on the shelf until the fight takes place, even though the timescale, seven months since Haye fought Audley Harrison, fits in with Haye's recent pattern of fighting at an average rate of once every six- months.

So who is to blame? Bernd Boente represents the Klitschko brothers; he yesterday told Rick Reeno that the issue revolves around British broadcaster Sky TV and their decision to air an Amir Khan PPV in the month of April, Wlad and Haye’s preferred fight date. Showing two PPVs in a single month would be counterintuitive for Sky as it would impact on the sales, promotion and visibility of both events.

Indeed, Wlad yesterday told Mike Marley that as far as he is aware the Haye fight is still a going concern. “The fight with Haye is not off, the fight is on,” Klitschko stressed. “We had to get clearance on a date with Sky TV for pay-per-view in the UK and they were concerned about conflicting with the upcoming Royal Wedding. So the wedding is set for the end of April and we got clearance on a fight date of July 2, for sure. I will fight Chisora on an April date, in Germany. Then we will move forward with Haye.”

Adam Booth, who trains Haye, reacted angrily to news that Wlad will take on Chisora. Booth feels that his fighter has had to surrender almost everything during the negotiations and that Klitschko's decision to take an interim fight is akin to admitting that the Germany-based Ukrainian wants no part of his fighter.

So who is to blame? Fans are thoroughly fed up of these shenanigans and their anger oscillates between both fighters, their camps and has now switched to Sky TV for their refusal to accommodate the fight in the month of April.

Sky, however, have a point, putting on two massive PPVs in the same month is a big undertaking, especially given the fact that times are hard. Therefore the decision to broadcast a single PPV in the month of April is a sound one, the decision to choose Amir over Haye is equally wise.

Consider, Sky would do massive numbers on Wlad-Haye but they would have to renege on their current deal with Khan in order to do this, Amir's team may resent this and it could sour their relationship with the broadcaster.

Sure, Sky can potentially make a huge amount of money from Haye versus Wlad, and possibly Haye against Vitali should he beat the younger brother, but, in the long-term, the company stands to make more money from Khan as Haye is due to retire before the end of the year whereas Amir has a half-decade of big fights left in him.

Historically, Amir tends to fight three times per year; he eased off last year, two fights in 2010, but put in three PPVs in 2009 and represents good value. Haye and Wlad, both of whom have withdrawn from major bouts at short-notice, are far riskier than Amir when it comes to putting on a PPV, especially in light of their recent, diva-ish behaviour. A concert featuring Mariah Carey and Whitney Houston would be a safer PPV bet than Wlad-Haye given recent non-events.

Haye, it would appear, has become the victim of his own timescale; he will be a non-issue by this time next year as far as Sky are concerned whereas Khan will be a going concern. No wonder, then, that the network has decided to honour its agreement with Khan, who is Mr Reliable when it comes to fight dates.

Boente’s statement that, ‘We have been in negotiations with Haye's side for three weeks regarding dates and venues in Germany and England but nothing worked. The main point, Sky was not willing to do a second pay-per-view in the same month. They didn't want to move the Khan fight. There were no dates that worked in May or June, so the first available date that worked for everyone was July 2. Sky gave their confirmation this morning’, makes sense when looked at in this way.

This delay would leave both fighters kicking their heels for the first half of 2011, Wlad-Chisora, therefore, is acceptable as it was already in play and gives Wlad a chance to shed some rust ahead of a Haye showdown, with Haye able to do the same should he take another fight in the first half of 2011.

This leaves Haye with the possibility of three fights in 2011, AN Other Heavy, Wlad and then Vitali, this may be a hectic schedule but given the fact that David will retire soon thereafter it seems feasible that he could have three run outs this year. His only other choice is to forget both Klits or kick his heels until Wlad is ready to fight.

However, if we were to play devil’s advocate, we could easily heap the blame on Wlad, his fight against Chisora is being described as a chance to shed rust and fine tune his skills ahead of a summer showdown with Haye. Fans would prefer it if Wlad nixed the Chisora fight and agreed to hold fire until the summer, the fighter and his camp insist that the consensus number one needs to stay busy.

In reality, this viewpoint is historically inaccurate, Wlad fought twice last year and generally fights twice per year; his busy 2008 was the exception rather than the norm. A layoff is painted as par for the course for Haye but misleadingly described as anathema to Wlad, who feels he needs to be razor sharp in order to negate and frustrate his foes.

The whole sorry saga has been played out with the distinct sense that both Klitschkos resent Haye’s bluster, not to mention the antics Haye employed in order to goad them into a confrontation. Their determination to hammer David in negotiations and Wlad’s gloating over the ease with which the Chisora fight was made seems a very Klitschko-esque way of gaining a measure of revenge for Haye’s outbursts and that infamous decapitation t-shirt.

You can almost imagine the two brothers having a chuckle between themselves as they read Haye’s declaration that he is through dealing with K2 Promotions. It would be typical of the Klits if they had carefully orchestrated events in order to get Haye hot under the collar ahead of the next round of negotiations.

For Haye’s part, it is hard not to feel for the Bermondsey-born bomber, his goading of the Klits led to that aborted summer 2009 showdown with Wlad, his win over Nikolay Valuev also added to his stock and made a fight with either Klitschko seem inevitable. This latest debacle, though, has left ‘Hayemaker’ twisting in the wind, his heavyweight CV will be patchy unless he gets one of the two brothers onto his slate – I imagine that the Klits realise this.

In giving in to all the demands – fight in Germany, allow Wlad’s name to feature prominently on the posters etc – Haye has served noticed of his overwhelming desire to take on one or both of the brothers. However, his self-imposed retirement timescale, which once seemed a wise decision, now makes him appear a desperate man. David is fighting against the clock with his legacy on the line, the brothers K hold all the aces when it comes to this fight, and they know it.

Adam Booth has talked about the fact that Wlad was facing a huge payday by virtue of Haye’s ability to bring Sky PPV to the table. The broadcaster’s stance left Klitschko with a stark choice: wait another six months for Haye or take on Chisora in a huge German arena for a relatively sizeable chunk of money. It is a no-brainer given the fact that Sky’s decision to accommodate Khan in April left the two heavies facing a half-year vacuum.

Haye’s other option, take on Vitali, means that he faces the same problems due to the PPV situation. Indeed, I recently speculated that Haye would be best served going for Vitali first as he will have to fight the older brother at some point. Vitali could easily jettison the WBC title or ask the organising body to allow a money-spinning unification to take place. Boente insists that Haye-Vitali is easily doable and a different date, March or May, could see Sky PPV come back onboard.

Given all the angles, it would seem that there is no outright villain in this particular story, merely a chain of fairly banal non-events, claims and counter-claims. Booth and Boente both agreed to take the negotiations public when speaking to Sky Sports late last year, both have been true to their word yet all they have achieved in doing this is to ensure that boxing faces a very public humiliation as one of 2011’s biggest fights goes down the pan with the year not yet a week old.

Ironically, the man who finished 2010 with a frown can now turn that frown into a smile; Derek Chisora was delighted when word got to him that Wlad will honour their fight contract. “This news is a fantastic late Christmas present,” revealed Chisora.

“I always believed that I would fight Klitschko, and my faith has been repaid. I was a bit worried that he might try and fight an easier touch, but I think I've earned my opportunity. I was gutted when Wladimir pulled out of our fight just a couple of days beforehand. But now I've got another chance to take his titles away.”

A chance, perhaps, that will now never come Haye’s way.
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
So no one wants to talk about how Wlad is ducking Haye's. Just a few months ago everyone was talking about how Haye was running from Wlad. Now that Haye's agreed to all the BS terms for the fight Wlad don't want to fight now. Wow sound just like Manny after Mayweather agreed to pay Manny a million dollars every pound over 147lb, glove size, ring size, and all Mayweather asked for was drug testing. Manny didn't want to take random drug testing with a 7-day cut-off window for the May 2010 fight. But sure Haye and Mayweather was both ducking right lol.. Yet both agreed to dumb ass terms to make the fight and they get called the duckers. Meanwhile Wlad and Manny are fighting nothing but bums and they get hyped up and fanfare for it.. But no one talks about Wlad and Manny ducking fighter left and right.. I just don't understand peoples logic at all anymore..
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
I don't see Wlad ducking Haye at all. He had an injury and is slated to fight someone else already. Plus he says the fight is still on.

One of Haye's excuses was "it was too close to the Amir Khan fight"

Seriously?
What the hell does Khan have to do with this? They aren't even from the same camp!
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
^^^It's nothing like the floyd-manny situation, nothing at all.

Both haye and wlad are some bitches as far as I'm concerned.

Wlad and Haye basically agreed on everything and to fight on July 2nd.

Wlad goes ahead and schedules to fight basically a tune up fight on April 30th with Chisora, who Wlad was supposed to fight a few weeks ago.

David Haye flips out and basically is saying he's going to retire without fighting klitschko as a result.

Ok, really?

Wlad is an idiot for scheduling a tune up so close to the david haye fight.

David Haye is an idiot for crying like a baby about a tune up. Why should he care if Wlad has a tune up? As long as Wlad shows up July 2nd who cares???
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
@bigface, I thought Mayweather agreed to pay "10" million dollars per every pound he was over and all Floyd wanted was some blood as close to the fight as possible. Doesn't sound like a ducker to me.....

Now it looks like Wlad is running from Haye.... everything was agreed to.
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
Wlad talked all that shit about how Haye was running from him, but now he scared to fight Haye. Do you guys really think that Wlad is going to fight Haye nine weeks after Chisora? Hell no he's scared and he wants his big brother to fight him 1st. I'm calling a spade a spade.. Haye's stepped up to the plate and agreed to all the bullshit terms, fuck Chisora and fight Haye. I see Wlad claiming he got hurt in the Chisora fight so Haye would have to fight his big brother 1st.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
bigface, if Wlad was scared to fight David Haye, then how come they were scheduled to fight and ONE WEEK before the fight David Haye pulled out because he had a "bad back?"

And then instead of rescheduling to fight Wlad he tried to fight Vitali Klitschko? And then pulled out of that fight as well..................................


To refresh your memory:
June 3, 2009
Haye pulls out of fight due to hand injury
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=4227567


Haye agrees to Vitali fight, then pulls out:
http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=21171

After what appeared to be a done deal, boxing fans were stunned when David Haye announced on Wednesday that he declined a fight with Vitali Klitschko, and instead agreed to face WBA champion Nikolai Valuev. Klitschko-Haye was set down for September 12 in Frankfurt, Germany. The television deals were in place. A stadium that seats 55,000 fans was secured. Haye's date with Valuev is said to be November 7 in Germany.​


David Haye is starting to rival Joe Calzghe with all his cancellations due to "injuries"
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
Haye pulled out that fight to get his money up before Wlad KO's him, and he had a back injury. Now Haye is ready to fight. So step up Wlad don't be scared homie..