i was wondering the other day...how in the wild you got predators and you got prey...it seems to me that you could put that tag on whites and call them predators...they way they partake in hostile takeovers...chances are if some countrys got something bush wants...you better believe that country will turn out to be a teerorist haven or a supporter of terrorism(to put it into todays events)...it seems anyone is fair game in this real game of surival...much like those mofos hunt down ice t in that one movie...everyones got a bullseye on them if they got something of value that the trendy materialistic devils of america want.
are whites humanitys curse?
- Thread starter askG
- Start date
You created one racist thread to get attention and it worked. Now your just being dumb. I understand that people (like yourself) like to do and say crazy things to get attention, like puting 400 pound bitches in their sig, but your going to catch one if you keep at this. You are disrespecting people on this board with your senseless racist bullshit and it is going to catch up to you if you don't kill it immediatley. It doesn't bother me so much that you created a retarded thread like this as it does when moderators leave it up for people to read. Are white people predators? Dog, are you stupid? Fuck you. I am your predator.
*You* are the cancer to all oppressed minorities.
*You* are what fuels racism in white people.
*You* are what creates everything you have been against on this board.
I'm going to say this as nicely as I can.. SHUT THE FUCK UP, please.
I vote this the dumbest fucking thread ever created.
*You* are the cancer to all oppressed minorities.
*You* are what fuels racism in white people.
*You* are what creates everything you have been against on this board.
I'm going to say this as nicely as I can.. SHUT THE FUCK UP, please.
I vote this the dumbest fucking thread ever created.
1. I THANK THE MODS FOR LEAVING THIS THREAD UP. IT'S NOT HATE SPEECH NOR SHOULD IT BE CONSIDERED AS HATE SPEECH.
2. I THANK ASKG FOR MAKING THIS THREAD. IT SHOWS HOW INSECURE PEOPLE ARE WHEN CERTAIN OPINIONS/VIEWS ARE PRESENTED. I MEAN SERIOUSLY LOOK AT THE WORLD'S EMPIRES STARTING FROM GREECE TO THE PRESENT DAY. IN DOING SO YOU WILL SEE WHAT GROUP OF PEOPLE CAUSED DEATH AND DESTRUCTION ***EVERYWHERE*** THEY WENT. DESTRUCTION THAT IS *STILL* FELT TODAY.
3. WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE SCIENTIST AND HISTORIANS GROUP *ALL* PEOPLE INTO ONE OF THREE (OR SOMETIMES FOUR) RACIAL GROUPS.
4. I VOTE IT ONE OF THE BEST THREADS OF ALL TIME AND IT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE "CLASSICS" SECTION.
:HGK:
2. I THANK ASKG FOR MAKING THIS THREAD. IT SHOWS HOW INSECURE PEOPLE ARE WHEN CERTAIN OPINIONS/VIEWS ARE PRESENTED. I MEAN SERIOUSLY LOOK AT THE WORLD'S EMPIRES STARTING FROM GREECE TO THE PRESENT DAY. IN DOING SO YOU WILL SEE WHAT GROUP OF PEOPLE CAUSED DEATH AND DESTRUCTION ***EVERYWHERE*** THEY WENT. DESTRUCTION THAT IS *STILL* FELT TODAY.
3. WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE SCIENTIST AND HISTORIANS GROUP *ALL* PEOPLE INTO ONE OF THREE (OR SOMETIMES FOUR) RACIAL GROUPS.
4. I VOTE IT ONE OF THE BEST THREADS OF ALL TIME AND IT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE "CLASSICS" SECTION.
:HGK:
you can't lump all whites together... where as i don't believe in the race classification, if you were to lump by race, all whites shouldn't be lumped together. that's like saying all black people are the same. that's not true... african american's are different than kenyans... kenyans are different from nigerians. Russians are different than the irish, and germans are different than scotts. so to blame this shit on "white" people, is no different than me using a stereotype and saying that "black" people cause poverty... that means african americans, brazillians, jamaicans, kenyans, and so on. and everyone knows, or should know, that's BS
"3. WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE SCIENTIST AND HISTORIANS GROUP *ALL* PEOPLE INTO ONE OF THREE (OR SOMETIMES FOUR) RACIAL GROUPS. "
THIS IS FACT THAT CAN BE VERIFIED BY SIMPLY READING BOOKS ON THE SUBJECT (WHICH ALSO CONSISTS OF VARIOUS FORMS OF ANTHROPOLOGY). YOU HAVE THREE MAJOR RACES:
1.NEGROIDS
2.CAUCASOIDS
3.MONGOLOIDS
SHOULD ONE BLAME RUSSIANS FOR WHAT THE IRISH DO? NO. BLAME THE RUSSIANS WHO DID IT. NO ONE IS SAYING ALL PEOPLE ARE THE SAME. "MAN" IS *ONE* SPECIES, YET DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF MAN EXIST.
BTW I LOVE YOUR COMMENT ABOUT BLACKS CAUSING POVERTY.....IF YOU DID STATE SOMETHING LIKE THAT I WOULD ASK YOU HOW BLACKS CAUSE POVERTY WHEN BLACKS DON'T CONTROL 30% OF THE WEALTH IN THIS COUNTRY. I WOULD ALSO ASK YOU TO EXPLAIN THE IMPACT THAT BLACK WALL STREET HAD ON AMERICAS ECONOMY.
:HGK:
THIS IS FACT THAT CAN BE VERIFIED BY SIMPLY READING BOOKS ON THE SUBJECT (WHICH ALSO CONSISTS OF VARIOUS FORMS OF ANTHROPOLOGY). YOU HAVE THREE MAJOR RACES:
1.NEGROIDS
2.CAUCASOIDS
3.MONGOLOIDS
SHOULD ONE BLAME RUSSIANS FOR WHAT THE IRISH DO? NO. BLAME THE RUSSIANS WHO DID IT. NO ONE IS SAYING ALL PEOPLE ARE THE SAME. "MAN" IS *ONE* SPECIES, YET DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF MAN EXIST.
BTW I LOVE YOUR COMMENT ABOUT BLACKS CAUSING POVERTY.....IF YOU DID STATE SOMETHING LIKE THAT I WOULD ASK YOU HOW BLACKS CAUSE POVERTY WHEN BLACKS DON'T CONTROL 30% OF THE WEALTH IN THIS COUNTRY. I WOULD ALSO ASK YOU TO EXPLAIN THE IMPACT THAT BLACK WALL STREET HAD ON AMERICAS ECONOMY.
:HGK:
White people do give a fuck about what he said. Racist white people are not born racist; they are either raised that way, or they develope the mentality through expierences in ther life. If one were to encounter someone like askG, it is likely that his reactions would be negetive, not towards just askG, but to his race in general. It is unlikely it will all happen over night, but when it is repeated, and by different people, the reaction become much stronger. A perfect example of what I am talking about is in the movie Higher Learning. I know it is a fictious movie, but watch Remmy very closely throughout that movie. Watch the things that happen to him, and watch how he reacts. It is not a coincidence that John Singleton plotted the movie like this; there is a message in it.
I recomend this movie to Heresy and askG. Maybe they will learn a thing or two about race relations.
Saying that all white people are materialistic devils who hunt down non-whites like Ice-T is not hate speech? And if I said all black people are criminals who hunt down old ladys to rob and rape them -- would that not be hate speech? Your an outsider trying to say what is or isn't hate speech, and it's not working at all.
It shows how insecure people are? That is your answer to this?! If I call someone a "n!gger" on this board and phil comes in saying he likes it because he gets to see how insecure black people are, this is ok with you? If it is not, you need to take a long deep look at what you're saying because it makes no sense, and it reeks of hypocrisy. No one likes a hypocrite heresy.
EVERYONE HAS CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME. YOUR TRYING TO BLAME WORLD ATROCITIES ON A COLOR OF SKIN> ROFL~!@ DOES THE WHITENESS SEEP THROUGH AND MAKE US CRAZY HERESY? IS THERE SOMETHING IN THE SKIN COLORING THAT MAKES US WANT TO HURT PEOPLE HERESY? BLACK - WHITE - BROWN - YELLOW PEOPLES HAVE ALL CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME HERESY, LEARN ABOUT IT.
When they do this, do they label and stereotype them as evil devil predators? No they don't, so fuck those scientists.
You just killed it. I was actually believing some of this crap you posted until that part came out. Now I know you just made the whole thing up to piss off white people and get attention just like askG. It's just a message board, why do you guys thrive off people taking notice of you?
I recomend this movie to Heresy and askG. Maybe they will learn a thing or two about race relations.
Saying that all white people are materialistic devils who hunt down non-whites like Ice-T is not hate speech? And if I said all black people are criminals who hunt down old ladys to rob and rape them -- would that not be hate speech? Your an outsider trying to say what is or isn't hate speech, and it's not working at all.
It shows how insecure people are? That is your answer to this?! If I call someone a "n!gger" on this board and phil comes in saying he likes it because he gets to see how insecure black people are, this is ok with you? If it is not, you need to take a long deep look at what you're saying because it makes no sense, and it reeks of hypocrisy. No one likes a hypocrite heresy.
EVERYONE HAS CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME. YOUR TRYING TO BLAME WORLD ATROCITIES ON A COLOR OF SKIN> ROFL~!@ DOES THE WHITENESS SEEP THROUGH AND MAKE US CRAZY HERESY? IS THERE SOMETHING IN THE SKIN COLORING THAT MAKES US WANT TO HURT PEOPLE HERESY? BLACK - WHITE - BROWN - YELLOW PEOPLES HAVE ALL CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME HERESY, LEARN ABOUT IT.
When they do this, do they label and stereotype them as evil devil predators? No they don't, so fuck those scientists.
You just killed it. I was actually believing some of this crap you posted until that part came out. Now I know you just made the whole thing up to piss off white people and get attention just like askG. It's just a message board, why do you guys thrive off people taking notice of you?
1. I HAVE THAT MOVIE. REMY WAS LOOKING TO BE ACCEPTED AND IT SO HAPPENS THAT HE WAS ACCEPTED BY RACIST. NO ONE IS BORN "RACIST". RACISM IS A 3 STEP PROCESS. IT MUST FIRST BE *TAUGHT*, AFTER THAT IT MUST BE *ACCEPTED* AND FINALLY IT MUST BE *PRACTICED*.
2. I'M NOT WHITE BUT "I GAVE A FUCK ABOUT WHAT HE SAID". I SIMPLY DON'T SEE IT HOW YOU SEE IT.
3. YOU SAID: "Saying that all white people are materialistic devils who hunt down non-whites like Ice-T is not hate speech?"
COME ON NITRO THAT IS ***NOT*** WHAT HE SAID. PLEASE QUOTE HIM AS SAYING ALL WHITE PEOPLE WERE MATERIALISTIC DEVILS WHO HUNT DOWN NON WHITES? I'LL QUOTE HIM FOR YOU BECAUSE YOUR ASSESSMENT IS WAAAAAAAY OFF.
"it seems anyone is fair game in this real game of surival...much like those mofos hunt down ice t in that one movie"
NOTE THAT HIS RESPONSE WAS *ANYONE* IS FAIR GAME. HE DID *NOT* LIMIT IT TO "NON-WHITES" LIKE YOU IMPLY. HE IS COMPARING THE REAL WORLD TO THE MOVIE WHERE ICE-T WAS HUNTED. HE DIDN'T COMPARE ICE-T TO MATERIALISTIC DEVILS AS NOTED IN THE NEXT QUOTE:
"everyones got a bullseye on them if they got something of value that the trendy materialistic devils of america want."
NOTE HIS STATEMENT SAYS *EVERYONES GOT A BULLSEYE*. HE DID NOT LIMIT HIS STATEMENT TO NON-WHITES NOR DID HE IMPLY "ALL WHITES" WHERE MATERIALISTIC DEVILS.
"And if I said all black people are criminals who hunt down old ladys to rob and rape them -- would that not be hate speech? "
I WOULD SAY IT'S STUPIDITY BEFORE I WOULD CLASSIFY IT AS HATE SPEECH. I WOULD ALSO ASK YOU TO PROVE TO ME HOW BLACKS ARE CRIMINALS WHO HUNT DOWN OLD LADIES ETC ETC ETC.
"Your an outsider trying to say what is or isn't hate speech, and it's not working at all."
NO I'M NOT AN OUTSIDER. WHEN YOU ADDRESS PROBLEMS IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY ARE YOU AN OUTSIDER? YOU'RE NOT BLACK SHOULD YOU ADDRESS CERTAIN PROBLEMS? BECAUSE I'M NOT WHITE AND THE COMMENT WASN'T DIRECTED TOWARDS PEOPLE OF MY RACE THAT PROHIBITS ME FROM MAKING A POST? *YOU'RE* THE ONE WHO IS TRYING TO SAY WHAT IS AND ISN'T HATE SPEECH AND IN DOING SO YOU ***TWISTED*** WHAT THE MAN SAID. WHAT YOU'RE DOING IS NOT WORKING AT ALL.
"It shows how insecure people are? That is your answer to this?! If I call someone a "n!gger" on this board and phil comes in saying he likes it because he gets to see how insecure black people are, this is ok with you? If it is not, you need to take a long deep look at what you're saying because it makes no sense, and it reeks of hypocrisy. No one likes a hypocrite heresy."
ASK G DID NOT USE ONE RACIAL SLUR IN HIS POST. YOU CALLING SOMEONE A NIGGER IS NOT THE SAME AS SOMEONE GIVING AN OPINION ON CERTAIN PEOPLE AND CERTAIN EVENTS. IMHO THIS POST CLEARLY SHOWS HOW MANY OF YOU PRACTICE "BLIND RACISM" AND HAVE NOT COME TO GRIPS WITH CERTAIN ROLES "WHITE" PEOPLE HAVE PLAYED IN HUMANITY.
BTW IF YOU CALLED ANYONE A NIGGER AND THEY STOMPED THE SHIT OUT OF YOU THAT'S YOUR BUSINESS. I'M NOT OFFENDED BY RACIAL SLURS, STEREOTYPES AND STIGMAS THAT COME FROM FOOLS.
"EVERYONE HAS CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME. YOUR TRYING TO BLAME WORLD ATROCITIES ON A COLOR OF SKIN> ROFL~!@ DOES THE WHITENESS SEEP THROUGH AND MAKE US CRAZY HERESY? IS THERE SOMETHING IN THE SKIN COLORING THAT MAKES US WANT TO HURT PEOPLE HERESY? BLACK - WHITE - BROWN - YELLOW PEOPLES HAVE ALL CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME HERESY, LEARN ABOUT IT."
YES EVERYONE HAS CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME BUT NO "RACE" HAS CAUSED MORE DESTRUCTION THAN THE CAUCASOID GROUP. I'VE YET TO HEAR OF ASIANS TRAVELLING TO AFRIKA TO SNATCH SLAVES TO HARVEST RICE CROPS. I'VE YET TO HEAR OF AFRIKANS TRAVELLING TO THE "AMERICA'S" TO SMASH ON NATIVE AMERICANS. I'VE YET TO HEAR OF NATIVE AMERICANS TRAVELLING TO EUROPE AND FORCING THEM ON A "TRAIL OF TEARS".
IS THERE SOMETHING IN THE SKIN COLOR? NO. SOMETHING IN THE GENETICS? YES POSSIBLY.
ONCE AGAIN EVERY RACE HAS CAUSED DESTRUCTION BUT WHO HAS CAUSED THE MOST DESTRUCTION? LOOKING AT ALL THE GREAT EMPIRES FROM GREECE TO THE PRESENT AGE SHOULD GIVE YOU A CLUE.
"When they do this, do they label and stereotype them as evil devil predators? No they don't, so fuck those scientists."
DID ASK G LABEL AND STEREOTYPE ANY SPECIFIC GROUP AS EVIL DEVIL PREDATORS? NO. YOU SHOULDN'T SAY FUCK THOSE SCIENTIST NITRO. THEY HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING TO YOU. MY REASON FOR LISTING THEM WAS TO PROVE THAT "WHITES" HAVE AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE GROUPED AS A RACE.
"You just killed it. I was actually believing some of this crap you posted until that part came out. Now I know you just made the whole thing up to piss off white people and get attention just like askG. It's just a message board, why do you guys thrive off people taking notice of you?"
NO ACTUALLY I DIDN'T MAKE THE THING UP TO PISS PEOPLE OFF. I'M ALMOST RUNNING LATE FOR DAWN OF THE DEAD BUT LET ME SAY THIS. READ WHAT HE POSTED....LOOK AT WHAT YOU POSTED IN RESPONSE TO HIM AND AFTER THAT READ A HISTORY BOOK....
:HGK:
2. I'M NOT WHITE BUT "I GAVE A FUCK ABOUT WHAT HE SAID". I SIMPLY DON'T SEE IT HOW YOU SEE IT.
3. YOU SAID: "Saying that all white people are materialistic devils who hunt down non-whites like Ice-T is not hate speech?"
COME ON NITRO THAT IS ***NOT*** WHAT HE SAID. PLEASE QUOTE HIM AS SAYING ALL WHITE PEOPLE WERE MATERIALISTIC DEVILS WHO HUNT DOWN NON WHITES? I'LL QUOTE HIM FOR YOU BECAUSE YOUR ASSESSMENT IS WAAAAAAAY OFF.
"it seems anyone is fair game in this real game of surival...much like those mofos hunt down ice t in that one movie"
NOTE THAT HIS RESPONSE WAS *ANYONE* IS FAIR GAME. HE DID *NOT* LIMIT IT TO "NON-WHITES" LIKE YOU IMPLY. HE IS COMPARING THE REAL WORLD TO THE MOVIE WHERE ICE-T WAS HUNTED. HE DIDN'T COMPARE ICE-T TO MATERIALISTIC DEVILS AS NOTED IN THE NEXT QUOTE:
"everyones got a bullseye on them if they got something of value that the trendy materialistic devils of america want."
NOTE HIS STATEMENT SAYS *EVERYONES GOT A BULLSEYE*. HE DID NOT LIMIT HIS STATEMENT TO NON-WHITES NOR DID HE IMPLY "ALL WHITES" WHERE MATERIALISTIC DEVILS.
"And if I said all black people are criminals who hunt down old ladys to rob and rape them -- would that not be hate speech? "
I WOULD SAY IT'S STUPIDITY BEFORE I WOULD CLASSIFY IT AS HATE SPEECH. I WOULD ALSO ASK YOU TO PROVE TO ME HOW BLACKS ARE CRIMINALS WHO HUNT DOWN OLD LADIES ETC ETC ETC.
"Your an outsider trying to say what is or isn't hate speech, and it's not working at all."
NO I'M NOT AN OUTSIDER. WHEN YOU ADDRESS PROBLEMS IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY ARE YOU AN OUTSIDER? YOU'RE NOT BLACK SHOULD YOU ADDRESS CERTAIN PROBLEMS? BECAUSE I'M NOT WHITE AND THE COMMENT WASN'T DIRECTED TOWARDS PEOPLE OF MY RACE THAT PROHIBITS ME FROM MAKING A POST? *YOU'RE* THE ONE WHO IS TRYING TO SAY WHAT IS AND ISN'T HATE SPEECH AND IN DOING SO YOU ***TWISTED*** WHAT THE MAN SAID. WHAT YOU'RE DOING IS NOT WORKING AT ALL.
"It shows how insecure people are? That is your answer to this?! If I call someone a "n!gger" on this board and phil comes in saying he likes it because he gets to see how insecure black people are, this is ok with you? If it is not, you need to take a long deep look at what you're saying because it makes no sense, and it reeks of hypocrisy. No one likes a hypocrite heresy."
ASK G DID NOT USE ONE RACIAL SLUR IN HIS POST. YOU CALLING SOMEONE A NIGGER IS NOT THE SAME AS SOMEONE GIVING AN OPINION ON CERTAIN PEOPLE AND CERTAIN EVENTS. IMHO THIS POST CLEARLY SHOWS HOW MANY OF YOU PRACTICE "BLIND RACISM" AND HAVE NOT COME TO GRIPS WITH CERTAIN ROLES "WHITE" PEOPLE HAVE PLAYED IN HUMANITY.
BTW IF YOU CALLED ANYONE A NIGGER AND THEY STOMPED THE SHIT OUT OF YOU THAT'S YOUR BUSINESS. I'M NOT OFFENDED BY RACIAL SLURS, STEREOTYPES AND STIGMAS THAT COME FROM FOOLS.
"EVERYONE HAS CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME. YOUR TRYING TO BLAME WORLD ATROCITIES ON A COLOR OF SKIN> ROFL~!@ DOES THE WHITENESS SEEP THROUGH AND MAKE US CRAZY HERESY? IS THERE SOMETHING IN THE SKIN COLORING THAT MAKES US WANT TO HURT PEOPLE HERESY? BLACK - WHITE - BROWN - YELLOW PEOPLES HAVE ALL CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME HERESY, LEARN ABOUT IT."
YES EVERYONE HAS CAUSED DESTRUCTION THROUGHOUT TIME BUT NO "RACE" HAS CAUSED MORE DESTRUCTION THAN THE CAUCASOID GROUP. I'VE YET TO HEAR OF ASIANS TRAVELLING TO AFRIKA TO SNATCH SLAVES TO HARVEST RICE CROPS. I'VE YET TO HEAR OF AFRIKANS TRAVELLING TO THE "AMERICA'S" TO SMASH ON NATIVE AMERICANS. I'VE YET TO HEAR OF NATIVE AMERICANS TRAVELLING TO EUROPE AND FORCING THEM ON A "TRAIL OF TEARS".
IS THERE SOMETHING IN THE SKIN COLOR? NO. SOMETHING IN THE GENETICS? YES POSSIBLY.
ONCE AGAIN EVERY RACE HAS CAUSED DESTRUCTION BUT WHO HAS CAUSED THE MOST DESTRUCTION? LOOKING AT ALL THE GREAT EMPIRES FROM GREECE TO THE PRESENT AGE SHOULD GIVE YOU A CLUE.
"When they do this, do they label and stereotype them as evil devil predators? No they don't, so fuck those scientists."
DID ASK G LABEL AND STEREOTYPE ANY SPECIFIC GROUP AS EVIL DEVIL PREDATORS? NO. YOU SHOULDN'T SAY FUCK THOSE SCIENTIST NITRO. THEY HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING TO YOU. MY REASON FOR LISTING THEM WAS TO PROVE THAT "WHITES" HAVE AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE GROUPED AS A RACE.
"You just killed it. I was actually believing some of this crap you posted until that part came out. Now I know you just made the whole thing up to piss off white people and get attention just like askG. It's just a message board, why do you guys thrive off people taking notice of you?"
NO ACTUALLY I DIDN'T MAKE THE THING UP TO PISS PEOPLE OFF. I'M ALMOST RUNNING LATE FOR DAWN OF THE DEAD BUT LET ME SAY THIS. READ WHAT HE POSTED....LOOK AT WHAT YOU POSTED IN RESPONSE TO HIM AND AFTER THAT READ A HISTORY BOOK....
:HGK:
Thats all correct but number two doesn't just happen. People teach and practice racism every day, but one doesn't just accept it because it's there or it sounds interesting (not saying it never does). I believe that white people accept racism because of their expierences with those who they are eventually prejudice against. Remy may have accepted it, but it was based on how black people at that school treated him. Look how he acted when those Nazi's brought him in, he was scared, confused, and wasn't really down for the cause. Then more shit happened to him, and he built up this hatred for those who he believed were doing him wrong, black people.
I said: "Saying that all white people are materialistic devils.."
He said: "that the trendy materialistic devils of america want"
I said: "who hunt down non-whites like Ice-T"
He said: "it seems anyone is fair game in this real game of surival...much like those mofos hunt down ice t in that one movie..."
Much like those mofos that hunt down Ice-T in that movie... Heresy, he said "much like" that movie. Now what are the details of that movie, a bunch of white guys hunting down a black man? Come on now. I understand that we interpret his post differently, but this shit is obvious to me.
THIS IS HIS QUOTE: "it seems anyone is fair game in this real game of surival...much like those mofos hunt down ice t in that one movie...everyones got a bullseye on them if they got something of value that the trendy materialistic devils of america want."
That all goes together if you ask me (and probably anyone else on this board).
He did not use racial slurs, but the fact that he pointed the finger at "white" people makes it extremely racist. What does skin color have to do with the will to cause destruction? There is no point in highlighting every destructive event in history that people with "white" skin were behind. To use such useless information and stereotype white people based upon this information is extremely racist, and if you don't see this, then I honestly think you are a prime example of the very blind racism you talk about. The fact that you defend him and the things he said prove this to me. I have come to grips with everything people of "white" skin have done in the past, I just don't see the need to emphasise it and stereotype "white" people as a whole based on it. What he has done here is *no different* then me studying the history of terrorist networks, and then labeling everyone of middle-eastern decent a terrorist. If he made the same post with evidence and support that having white skin is relevant to destruction, then I would have looked at it differently. But given his previous posts, where he called white people evil, I would have to say he is not interested in teaching anyone anything useful or positive.
I am not denying any of this. My point is, does this mean *anything* more than just a fucked up useless statistic on paper? Is this more than just a coincidence? If you *don't know* you shouldn't be agreeing with him in the first place. And if you think there is something to this, that maybe the color of ones skin is relevant to the destruction he causes, then let me hear your theory. What is the significance of skin color and the destruction one causes bearing the 3 different racial colors (as catagorized by scientists)?
Are you going to pin these events on a race of people rather than the government (leader) who caused it to happen? There are empires that were built by leaders who craved power, were greedy, lustful, etc. These properties of a human can drive them into a different way of thinking, seperate from the "average" person who he has control over. You can not hold a race of humans responsible for what few did. askG made a reference to Bush but doesn't know of the minority population who are actually doing the destruction along with "white" people under him.
HERESY if someone was brainwashed to believe something, then acted on it, would you blame him?
If you do not blame him, then you should be targeting Hitler, not Germany or "white" people; Musolinni not Italy or "white" people etc. etc. etc. Assessments should be made by a quality of a race that is consistant with everyone who makes up that race, not by few of them in the spotlight who lead an invasion or cause some sort of destruction. White people in the United States, from the beginning of slavery to recent history is something you could go on, because for the most part, it was consistant with *all* whites, that they enslave and inflict harm upon African Americans.
Yes askG did stereotype groups as both "evil" and "materialistic devil predators". If you want to find his "evil" quote, you can check out the "white racism.." thread started by WHITE DEVIL. His statement in the thread was "ill jus say white ppl are evil". Know that, and re-read this post and maybe you might see the racism.
I read what he posted; racism, provocation, prejudice, and stereotyping.
I read what I posted; a *reaction* to such prejudices.
History books? I have to assume that you are saying my reaction is similar (but less potent and powerful) to those of "white" skinned people who caused destruction. But I got just one question for you, who said this:
"..and I am going to tape the beating"
Now read a history book.
I said: "Saying that all white people are materialistic devils.."
He said: "that the trendy materialistic devils of america want"
I said: "who hunt down non-whites like Ice-T"
He said: "it seems anyone is fair game in this real game of surival...much like those mofos hunt down ice t in that one movie..."
Much like those mofos that hunt down Ice-T in that movie... Heresy, he said "much like" that movie. Now what are the details of that movie, a bunch of white guys hunting down a black man? Come on now. I understand that we interpret his post differently, but this shit is obvious to me.
THIS IS HIS QUOTE: "it seems anyone is fair game in this real game of surival...much like those mofos hunt down ice t in that one movie...everyones got a bullseye on them if they got something of value that the trendy materialistic devils of america want."
That all goes together if you ask me (and probably anyone else on this board).
He did not use racial slurs, but the fact that he pointed the finger at "white" people makes it extremely racist. What does skin color have to do with the will to cause destruction? There is no point in highlighting every destructive event in history that people with "white" skin were behind. To use such useless information and stereotype white people based upon this information is extremely racist, and if you don't see this, then I honestly think you are a prime example of the very blind racism you talk about. The fact that you defend him and the things he said prove this to me. I have come to grips with everything people of "white" skin have done in the past, I just don't see the need to emphasise it and stereotype "white" people as a whole based on it. What he has done here is *no different* then me studying the history of terrorist networks, and then labeling everyone of middle-eastern decent a terrorist. If he made the same post with evidence and support that having white skin is relevant to destruction, then I would have looked at it differently. But given his previous posts, where he called white people evil, I would have to say he is not interested in teaching anyone anything useful or positive.
I am not denying any of this. My point is, does this mean *anything* more than just a fucked up useless statistic on paper? Is this more than just a coincidence? If you *don't know* you shouldn't be agreeing with him in the first place. And if you think there is something to this, that maybe the color of ones skin is relevant to the destruction he causes, then let me hear your theory. What is the significance of skin color and the destruction one causes bearing the 3 different racial colors (as catagorized by scientists)?
Are you going to pin these events on a race of people rather than the government (leader) who caused it to happen? There are empires that were built by leaders who craved power, were greedy, lustful, etc. These properties of a human can drive them into a different way of thinking, seperate from the "average" person who he has control over. You can not hold a race of humans responsible for what few did. askG made a reference to Bush but doesn't know of the minority population who are actually doing the destruction along with "white" people under him.
HERESY if someone was brainwashed to believe something, then acted on it, would you blame him?
If you do not blame him, then you should be targeting Hitler, not Germany or "white" people; Musolinni not Italy or "white" people etc. etc. etc. Assessments should be made by a quality of a race that is consistant with everyone who makes up that race, not by few of them in the spotlight who lead an invasion or cause some sort of destruction. White people in the United States, from the beginning of slavery to recent history is something you could go on, because for the most part, it was consistant with *all* whites, that they enslave and inflict harm upon African Americans.
Yes askG did stereotype groups as both "evil" and "materialistic devil predators". If you want to find his "evil" quote, you can check out the "white racism.." thread started by WHITE DEVIL. His statement in the thread was "ill jus say white ppl are evil". Know that, and re-read this post and maybe you might see the racism.
I read what he posted; racism, provocation, prejudice, and stereotyping.
I read what I posted; a *reaction* to such prejudices.
History books? I have to assume that you are saying my reaction is similar (but less potent and powerful) to those of "white" skinned people who caused destruction. But I got just one question for you, who said this:
"..and I am going to tape the beating"
Now read a history book.