Anti-immigration: Obama orders troops to Mexican border
- Thread starter 2-0-Sixx
- Start date
I'm not guilty. *You're* the one that's guilty. The lawmakers, the politicians, the Columbian drug lords, all you who lobby against making drugs legal. Just like you did with alcohol during the prohibition. You're the one who's guilty. I mean, c'mon, let's kick the ballistics here: Ain't no Uzi's made in Harlem. Not one of us in here owns a poppy field. This thing is bigger than Nino Brown. This is big business. This is the American way.
your gettin too deep with it.....hes capitalist (which isnt a bad thing) maybe subliminaly, like all other presidents and members of congress, to keep them rich, since the government is "ran" (crappily) like a business, and business's run the government......he is a socialist in the way he wants to and is making things ran by the government..........he wants to keep the poor/ working middle class happy so they keep coming back......like an alley cat that you put food out for everyday.......keep feedin the cat and that cats gona love you..............the democrats, takin advantage of the poor.....thats why when you ask most democrats whats the diff between repubs and dems, they say "the democrats are for the poor"....naw man, the democrats use the poor.........
and who gives a fuck if the rich get richer, the rich create jobs, the richer create more jobs..........the poor and working middle class that bitch the most aint hiring no body............do the math.......
and who gives a fuck if the rich get richer, the rich create jobs, the richer create more jobs..........the poor and working middle class that bitch the most aint hiring no body............do the math.......
I hate Glenn Beck. I just follow what 'our' president is doing.
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and
said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as
long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every
nation a veto.
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State
Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's
administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national
controls were better.
On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms
in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun
control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the
signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing
international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the
US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress.
Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens
will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are
laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the
United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.
The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and
confiscation of all firearms.
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and
said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as
long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every
nation a veto.
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State
Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's
administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national
controls were better.
On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms
in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun
control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the
signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing
international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the
US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress.
Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens
will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are
laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the
United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.
The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and
confiscation of all firearms.
Actually I was being very simplistic with it. Knowing and understanding basic definitions of words and terminology is a good thing.
Again we have a case of someone who does not understand the basic definition of a word, this time "socialist." I challenge and advise you to do some research, understand the words which you speak and try to grasp the meaning of those words before using them again.
Also ask yourself why all socialists parties in America oppose Obama and his policies.
Again we have a case of someone who does not understand the basic definition of a word, this time "socialist." I challenge and advise you to do some research, understand the words which you speak and try to grasp the meaning of those words before using them again.
Also ask yourself why all socialists parties in America oppose Obama and his policies.
thats ignorant player.......do you think all these jobs that were created when the country was strong was from people that were living paycheck to paycheck? dont get lost in that deep liberalism.....its all bad.....
people hate capitalism but with out it it would be useless having personal or financial goals or ambition......
what i said : he is a socialist in the way he wants to and is making things ran by the government
what websters dictionary says:
Main Entry: so·cial·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1837
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done.
******in responce to your last comment, ask yourself why liberals also oppose Obama and his policies.........its niether here nor there.........
what websters dictionary says:
Main Entry: so·cial·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1837
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done.
******in responce to your last comment, ask yourself why liberals also oppose Obama and his policies.........its niether here nor there.........
i dont think your gettin it player.......what 2-0-SIXX said is niether here nor there.......as far as pinnin him to a side, it is what it is.....he's the most liberal president i have seen in my lifetime, im 30........and it sucks more cus im old enough to see whats goin on, you dont care as a kid...........and i aint takin sides.......im not a repub, i dont even like conservatives for a variety of reasons........both partys have good ideas, both have crap.......