Amir King Khan vs Super Zab Judah - 7/23

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    22
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
all that muscle and can't punch for shit.

timm, he is the headbutt king, everyone who follows the sport knows this. Not sure why you're all upset about it, just accept it. He turned down to fight khan for the biggest money of his life in HOPES that he'll fight pac or floyd one day. You can say that's "smart" all you want but in my book it was a dumb move because for 1. he will get paid roughly the same against floyd/pac and two there is no guarantee.

Now if he's smart, he'll fight Khan in December and try to clear his name. I think it would be a close fight but I would expect the fight to be stopped due to cuts.
 
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
104
the fact is that you dislike Bradley and post about him headbutting when your idol amir khan has done the exact same shit to win MULTIPLE fights. Period. You are a hypocrite.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
How the fuck are u going to say Khan is my idol?? I'm a fan of the sport not and all I've been saying is Khan looked impressive and as of right now he's the #1 fighter at 140. I don't dislike Bradley he's a good guy but his reputation has been hurt big time by turning down the Khan fight. That's not just me look around any boxing site.
 
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
104
206 gettin owned over here!!!! lmao
dude just pastes the exact same thing every time you drop some knowledge. "BRADLEY HEADBUTTZ!!!" "RING MAGAZINE sez so!!!" *paste random links from pactard websites*

EDIT:

dude thinks unbeaten bradley is worse that amir king glass khan, what a joke. Hypocrisy is astounding with the headbutting shit.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
dude just pastes the exact same thing every time you drop some knowledge. "BRADLEY HEADBUTTZ!!!" "RING MAGAZINE sez so!!!" *paste random links from pactard websites*

EDIT:
pactard websites, wtf are you talking about?

Are you trying to deny bradley has a headbutting problem? lmao you are you delusional. I don't need to even post articles or videos, just watch his damn fights he's headbutted everyone. It's his style of fighting. The way he bum rushes inside with his head up. You're a fucking idiot if you don't see it.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
DAMN !!! THAT MAKES IT WORSE!!!!! TIMM THE 15 YR OLD 206 SLAYER LOL!!
explain how I'm getting "owned" in this thread? It is literally a fact bradley has cut his last 6 opponents in a row due to headbutts, you think that's normal? It is a fact Bradley turned down over $3 million to fight Khan. It's a fact Khan is now ranked #1 at jww. How did timm own me again?
 
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
104
I love how he was called out for being literally on Khan's dick and then he completely shifted the argument to whether or not Bradley butts or not. In case you can't read, that was never the argument. The fact is that you are a hypocrite for calling out Bradley on the headbutts, when your lover has gotten TD's from it, and headbutted twice in his unification fight, leaving a cut on Judah. No one ever said Bradley didn't headbutt
 
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
104
So that means you were 13 years old when he was headbutting Cherry and Campbell. You don't shit about the sport little man.
I have been watching boxing with my father since I was very young and he has been watching the sport for longer than you have been alive. Next.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
I love how he was called out for being literally on Khan's dick and then he completely shifted the argument to whether or not Bradley butts or not.
Are you literally retarded? All you have to do is click back one page and you'll see where the discussion about headbutts started. As I've been saying, cutting your last 6 opponents in a row due to headbutts is a problem.

In case you can't read, that was never the argument. The fact is that you are a hypocrite for calling out Bradley on the headbutts, when your lover has gotten TD's from it, and headbutted twice in his unification fight, leaving a cut on Judah. No one ever said Bradley didn't headbutt
And because you're a mental midget, I'll try explaining it to you there is a HUGE difference in headbutting at least 18 times in your last 6 fights then a couple headbutts here and there due to style clashes. As I've already shown, it doesn't matter what style bradley fights against his opponent are going to get cut due to a headbutt, and it's going to happen multiple times in the fight.

Whoever his next opponent is, whether it's a tune up fight like he says he wants, or khan, or someone at 147, I'll put money down that he cuts his opponent with that sharp ass head of his.
 
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
104
I love how he was called out for being literally on Khan's dick and then he completely shifted the argument to whether or not Bradley butts or not. In case you can't read, that was never the argument. The fact is that you are a hypocrite for calling out Bradley on the headbutts, when your lover has gotten TD's from it, and headbutted twice in his unification fight, leaving a cut on Judah. No one ever said Bradley didn't headbutt
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
I love how he was called out for being literally on Khan's dick and then he completely shifted the argument to whether or not Bradley butts or not.
Are you literally retarded? All you have to do is click back one page and you'll see where the discussion about headbutts started. As I've been saying, cutting your last 6 opponents in a row due to headbutts is a problem.

Calling me out for being on amir khan's dick (which is some straight faggot talk) because I think he's fighting great right now? yeah, sure ok.

In case you can't read, that was never the argument. The fact is that you are a hypocrite for calling out Bradley on the headbutts, when your lover has gotten TD's from it, and headbutted twice in his unification fight, leaving a cut on Judah. No one ever said Bradley didn't headbutt
And because you're a mental midget, I'll try explaining it to you there is a HUGE difference in headbutting at least 18 times in your last 6 fights then a couple headbutts here and there due to style clashes. As I've already shown, it doesn't matter what style bradley fights against his opponent are going to get cut due to a headbutt, and it's going to happen multiple times in the fight.

Whoever his next opponent is, whether it's a tune up fight like he says he wants, or khan, or someone at 147, I'll put money down that he cuts his opponent with that sharp ass head of his.
 
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
104
I love how he was called out for being literally on Khan's dick and then he completely shifted the argument to whether or not Bradley butts or not. In case you can't read, that was never the argument. The fact is that you are a hypocrite for calling out Bradley on the headbutts, when your lover has gotten TD's from it, and headbutted twice in his unification fight, leaving a cut on Judah. No one ever said Bradley didn't headbutt
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
ok, you want to post that three times now? Pretty pointless Timm.

If anyone is implying I'm on Khan's "nuts" is some retarded shit. I made fun of him something fierce when he got KO'd by Prescott but as a boxing fan who studies the game it's clear he's been improving and imo is the top guy at 140. I'm not a bandwagon fan or whatever, I really don't care if he wins or loses, it's not like that with me, just calling out the obvious.

I don't think anyone on this site can question my knowledge of the sport. There are only a select few who follow even more intensely then I do and I bet they would co-sign my assessment of Khan.

There is only one fighter I'm heavily biased with and I've always been straight up about that and that is Bernard Hopkins. He's by far my favorite fighter of all time. Other than that I'm on the other side of the fence about the floyd-pac debate - there is one half that believes floyd is right for demanding the extra tests, and there is the other half that thinks he was wrong for demanding the extra tests. I'm on the latter half.

Those are the two issues where my personal bias plays a role. And even then I'm a realist as I've always maintained that Floyd could beat Pacquiao with or without extra testing and I said Chad Dawson could possibly or even likely beat Hopkins.

At the end of the day I'm a huge boxing fan. Khan isn't even one of my top 20 favorite fighters to watch so kill that noise.