AFC PICKS?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who's gonna win the AFC?

  • Patriots

    Votes: 5 9.6%
  • Dolphins

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Colts

    Votes: 9 17.3%
  • Jaguars

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • Raiders

    Votes: 11 21.2%
  • Chiefs

    Votes: 5 9.6%
  • Broncos

    Votes: 5 9.6%
  • Steelers

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • Bengals

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • Ravens, Browns, Chargers, Texans, Titans, Jets, Bills

    Votes: 4 7.7%

  • Total voters
    52

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,363
13,861
113
39
#81
lmao, theres gonna be 7 ppl here that are gonna be let down when they see how bad the raiders are gonna do lmao, regardless of team situation

Plummer > Brooks

if u wanna look @ teams 1st stops


How was brooks in GB?

oh yeah, he sucked, he couldnt beat out favre.........
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#82
Tony said:
LOL... Plummber will not be. Look at his numbers when he was with the Cardinals. 90TD's (which is pretty good) vs 114 INT's. Those are his numbers with the Cards before he joined the Broncos. Yeah better than Brooks!
afraid to go pull it up I see!!!!!

When Denver signed him he was the highest active QB with 4th quarter comebacks......

But again don't go pull it because that info will be wrong...You may want to write the NFL and let them know thier stats are wrong.

BTW HERE YOU GO SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO PROVE YOURSELF WRONG

Table 1. Top 10 quarterbacks at comebacks since 1996
Rank Quarterback Wins Losses
1 Jake Plummer 19 28
2 Peyton Manning 19 29
2 Vinny Testaverde 19 29
4 Tom Brady 13 8
5 Jon Kitna 15 23
6 Kerry Collins 17 30
7 Donovan McNabb 12 15
8 Marc Bulger 10 5
9 Jake Delhomme 10 12
9 Jay Fiedler 10 12
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#83
thascary1 said:
You are officially a DIPSHIT!


It takes 2+ years for a qb to learn our offense, why do you think that first year in Denver Plummer still wasn't what he was last year?

Shanny is NOT ON HIS ASS, Shanny has already stated NUMEROUS times Plummer is the man this year and unless there is an injury nothing changes

Cutler will be the man.....maybe sometime NEXT year...but more than likely not until 2008 season...WHEN PLUMMER WILL BE GONE WITH NO CONTRACT........DIPSHIT
Read between the lines.... Shanahan would not draft a QB in the 1st round if doesn't plan on playing him soon. Why use a first rounder on a player that won't be playing until a few years. Don't be surprised to see Cutler taking snaps from under center. And it maybe sooner than you think. Shanahan is sending a message to Jake. We don't have the time to see here and wait. The Broncos lose the championship game at home, and then they trade up (if I am not mistaken) to draft a QB? Come on now... dink about it for a minute.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#84
Chree said:
lmao, theres gonna be 7 ppl here that are gonna be let down when they see how bad the raiders are gonna do lmao, regardless of team situation

Plummer > Brooks

if u wanna look @ teams 1st stops


How was brooks in GB?

oh yeah, he sucked, he couldnt beat out favre.........
And Matt Hasselbach for your info. Who could beat out Favre in Green Bay? And if Brooks was so garbage why was he drafted by Mike Holgrem?
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#85
Tony said:
Read between the lines.... Shanahan would not draft a QB in the 1st round if doesn't plan on playing him soon. Why use a first rounder on a player that won't be playing until a few years. Don't be surprised to see Cutler taking snaps from under center. And it maybe sooner than you think. Shanahan is sending a message to Jake. We don't have the time to see here and wait. The Broncos lose the championship game at home, and then they trade up (if I am not mistaken) to draft a QB? Come on now... dink about it for a minute.


FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Read all mt post dumbass......It takes 2+ years to learn our offense.....Plummer will be out of contract.....the qb's in the next few drafts are not as good as this years drafts unless you have a top 5 pick...WHICH DENVER WONT..................SO YOU GO AFTER FRANCHISE QB NOW...GROOM HIM AND WHEN HE IS READY HE PLAYS THEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!1


FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




But you're right noone could argue with the revolving door that has been raiders qb the past few years.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#86
thascary1 said:
afraid to go pull it up I see!!!!!

When Denver signed him he was the highest active QB with 4th quarter comebacks......

But again don't go pull it because that info will be wrong...You may want to write the NFL and let them know thier stats are wrong.

BTW HERE YOU GO SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO PROVE YOURSELF WRONG

Table 1. Top 10 quarterbacks at comebacks since 1996
Rank Quarterback Wins Losses
1 Jake Plummer 19 28
2 Peyton Manning 19 29
2 Vinny Testaverde 19 29
4 Tom Brady 13 8
5 Jon Kitna 15 23
6 Kerry Collins 17 30
7 Donovan McNabb 12 15
8 Marc Bulger 10 5
9 Jake Delhomme 10 12
9 Jay Fiedler 10 12
Why would you go back all the way to 96? Brooks and McNabb weren't drafted until like 99. Brady wasn't playing in 96 so how in the hell does he have any comebacks since then? Makes no sense. Do a search when they all started playing.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#88
Tony said:
And Matt Hasselbach for your info. Who could beat out Favre in Green Bay? And if Brooks was so garbage why was he drafted by Mike Holgrem?

WHY THE FUCK DID SHANNY DRAFT GRIESE????? The draft is hit or miss not foolproof...........But the EXPERT should know that.


WHY did so many teams miss on Brady, Terrell Davis, joe montana (3rd round for god's sake)...etc the list goes on
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#89
Tony said:
Why would you go back all the way to 96? Brooks and McNabb weren't drafted until like 99. Brady wasn't playing in 96 so how in the hell does he have any comebacks since then? Makes no sense. Do a search when they all started playing.

well why would you only go to half plummers career???? BECAUSE IT NEGATES YOU POSITION.....FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ALSO BRADY IS ON HERE BECAUSE IT IS CURRENT ACTIVE QB'S

SO OBVIOUSLY BRADY IS GOOD...DUH
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,363
13,861
113
39
#90
LOLOLOLLLLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL HAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH wow..... ignorance at its finest
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#91
thascary1 said:
well why would you only go to half plummers career???? BECAUSE IT NEGATES YOU POSITION.....FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ALSO BRADY IS ON HERE BECAUSE IT IS CURRENT ACTIVE QB'S

SO OBVIOUSLY BRADY IS GOOD...DUH
You're missing the whole point. Why in the hell would you do a search dating back to 96 when half of these quarterbacks weren't in the league? I said since 2000 because that's when McNabb, Brooks, Brady(maybe) were drafted. You aren't making any sense right now.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#92
Tony said:
You're missing the whole point. Why in the hell would you do a search dating back to 96 when half of these quarterbacks weren't in the league? I said since 2000 because that's when McNabb, Brooks, Brady(maybe) were drafted. You aren't making any sense right now.
You're missing the point. Why in the hell would I not include Plummer's full career when we are using everyine else's full career.

Or as you said yourself AZ sucked so why would I include Denver when PLUMMER HIMSELF is leading Denver to a win in the 4th quarter.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#95
Who is the only quarterback in the "HISTORY" of the NFL to have a 100 yard game rushing and a 400 yard game passing in the same season?
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#96
Tony said:
Because everyone's full career didn't begin in 96. We should use a year when everyone we're talking about started playing.

Fine if you do that watch this.

Marshall Faulk was a good running back but he can't compare to the likes of Michael Bennett and Duece McCalister. I mean geez since 2001 those guys have had just as much if not more yards



Sounds pretty stupid huh.


Faulk is way better then both but if you only yous the years they were in the league together it doesn't work...YOU USE FULL STATS
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#97
Tony said:
Who is the only quarterback in the "HISTORY" of the NFL to have a 100 yard game rushing and a 400 yard game passing in the same season?

Again 1 game does not make a season or career.

Answer me this, what did Mike Anderson do to Brooks Saints when he was a rookie....oh yeah ran for over 200 yards...doesn't mean he is the next Barry Sanders.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#99
Tony said:
Ok.... so what I get from your point is.... Deuce and Michael are better now.

No for thier whole career..we have to stick with the way you want things remember....So since we use stats when all 3 are in the league then overall Duece and Bennett are better than Faulk....that's what you say
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
thascary1 said:
Again 1 game does not make a season or career.

Answer me this, what did Mike Anderson do to Brooks Saints when he was a rookie....oh yeah ran for over 200 yards...doesn't mean he is the next Barry Sanders.
Again, you're missing the point. That didn't happen in one game. I am just saying if he is so garbage then why is his name in the record book. The only quarterback to have a 100 yard rushing game and a 400 yards passing game in the same season. Only one quarterback has done it in the history of the NFL! Now where's Plummer's, Green's, and Smith's name in the record books? Plummer's name is in there probably for the most fumbles. Smith's name is going to be in there for "BUSTS"!