So no one is going to make a thread on the Anaheim situation?

[Mac Jesus]

Selective youtube choices do not set the narrative for the majority, anyone can post selective screen shots, but it really doesn't matter even if it did.

None of this is providing a valid rebuttal to my original statement.

Additionally, as a result of his actions, the officer walked away unharmed and the little brats were dealt with.

Those were the first three videos that came up when I searched "13 year old cop shooting"

It wasnt anymore selective than that. Truth of the matter is, I think the majority of the population do not find children life threatening. Go have discussions on the street on this topic.

The last video filmed by the police officer gives a much more appropriate response on how to deal with this situation without firing a gun.

 

[Fucky McFuckerson]

You keep stressing this idea that "age is irrelevant", why then do you have an expectation about the way kids should act towards adults?

Isn't an expectation of interaction based on age the exact opposite of saying age is irrelevant?

Bingo.

 

[Mac Jesus]

Bingo.

Dude if you don't understand P @pony 's argument I don't think anyone is willing to take the time to sit you down and explain it to you. Stop cheerleading comments that have been addressed.

 

[Mr. Nice Guy]

if you or anyone else is unable to comprehend the logic behind that statement then they are not worth the time or effort it would take to provide guidance through an explanation.

No one can comprehend the "logic" behind your statements because the logic is inconsistent.

Your logic as presented by your posts is;

1) Age is irrelevant in determining right and wrong

2) It is wrong for kids to not respect the authority of adults conferred to them on the basis of age


So which is it? Is age irrelevant or should kids respect their elders on the basis of age?

 

[SeriouslyThug]

No one can comprehend the "logic" behind your statements because the logic is inconsistent.

Your logic as presented by your posts is;

1) Age is irrelevant in determining right and wrong

2) It is wrong for kids to not respect the authority of adults conferred to them on the basis of age


So which is it? Is age irrelevant or should kids respect their elders on the basis of age?

Oh yeah??? and what if he doesn't want to answer?!?!

 

[Mac Jesus]

The only logical thing to do is fire a warning shot with a gun.

 

[PONE]

No one can comprehend the "logic" behind your statements because the logic is inconsistent.

Your logic as presented by your posts is;

1) Age is irrelevant in determining right and wrong

2) It is wrong for kids to not respect the authority of adults conferred to them on the basis of age


So which is it? Is age irrelevant or should kids respect their elders on the basis of age?

Wrong. Thats the way YOU interpreted it. Which was WRONG, so I guess I will guide you through it.


Age is irrelevant when a person is being assaulted and has had their wellbeing put at risk.


Do you understand now? Or should I replace the big words?

 

[PONE]

The only logical thing to do is fire a warning shot with a gun.

Yes, we all read your comment (that failed) the first three times you posted it.
well done.

 

[PONE]

The only reasonable thing he could have done is pull out a gun and shoot it.

If you have a gun the only option is to fire it.

The only logical thing to do is fire a warning shot with a gun.

Excellent Work!

 

[Mac Jesus]

Excellent Work!

STOP BULLYING ME

 

[Mac Jesus]

Wrong. Thats the way YOU interpreted it. Which was WRONG, so I guess I will guide you through it.


Age is irrelevant when a person is being assaulted and has had their wellbeing put at risk.


Do you understand now? Or should I replace the big words?

At what point does one's well-being justify shooting a gun? Like, if a three year old pushes me? What if a 15 year old steps on my foot? Are these instances in which I or an officer of the law can use lethal force?

What if two 14 year old girls slap a clerk who tries to stop them from shoplifting?

Did the officers life look to be in danger at any point in that video? How are you defining well-being?

 

[Mac Jesus]

Have you encountered unruly children before @PONE ?

 

[Mac Jesus]

I am thinking of buying a gun because there is a high school near my place and if any of those kids threaten my well-being I want to be able to shoot a gun at them. That's the only logical thing to do in those situations.

 

[PONE]

STOP BULLYING ME

Wow that was a snappy comeback! Maybe if you re-post it three more times it will suddenly be humorous!

 

[Mac Jesus]

Wow that was a snappy comeback! Maybe if you re-post it three more times it will suddenly be humorous!

“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”


― Socrates

 

[PONE]

“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”


― Socrates

Exactly.

 

[PONE]

Have you encountered unruly children before @PONE ?

No, you're the first

 

[Mac Jesus]

No, you're the first

Plz dont shoot me

 

[Mr. Nice Guy]

Wrong. Thats the way YOU interpreted it. Which was WRONG, so I guess I will guide you through it.


Age is irrelevant when a person is being assaulted and has had their wellbeing put at risk.


Do you understand now? Or should I replace the big words?

I appreciate your effort to guide me though your logic.

So when children are being assaulted by an adult, they are within their rights to fight back to protect their well being?

Or adults should be able to assault children in an attempt to teach them proper manners?

I'm still not clear on your fundamental underlying logic. I can't speak to your use of big words, but if you continue to use random capitalizations I imagine that might help me to understand.

 

[WT SAVAGE]

Next time one of the neighbor kids walks on my lawn i should physically assult them, pull a gun on them and discharge said gun into the ground....

Ill report back after i post bail...

You know bc as a citizen i will be arrested.... and the fact im not white, im for sure going to jail.