Dude should be ashamed, not only for firing his gun around a bunch of kids but because he struggled so hard with a 13 year old. What an embarrassment, can't even contain a 13 year old child. You might not be fit for police duty, but I guess that's half the police force in America. Maybe more department should be like Hawaii were they need to stay physically fit year round.
dude was out of line period point blank for holdin that kid like that. if he had been in uniform then that woulda been a different story. he was in civilian clothes so he shoulda did some civilian shit like get it on camera.
Fuck all those "kids", lock em all up, and their parents too, for raising worthless little shits who were raised to think its ok to act that way with an adult especially when the adult is an officer.
The officer was threatened by a group (age is irrelevant) attempting to cause him physical harm, so he responded the most effective way possible.
if you or anyone else is unable to comprehend the logic behind that statement then they are not worth the time or effort it would take to provide guidance through an explanation.
if you or anyone else is unable to comprehend the logic behind that statement then they are not worth the time or effort it would take to provide guidance through an explanation.
Do you feel that if a large majority of people disagree with the logic behind your statement that it is because they need guidance (which is not worth your time) or could it potentially be an indication of the fact that your logic in of itself is flawed.
I have noticed that in the comment section of the video and news articles there is an overwhelming majority that feel as if the cop did wrong. When bringing it up in casual conversation I have yet to meet someone who agrees that shooting a gun (even as a warning) is a justifiable response to a group of children, no matter how adorably threatening they can be.
I have noticed that in the comment section of the video and news articles there is an overwhelming majority that feel as if the cop did wrong. When bringing it up in casual conversation I have yet to meet someone who agrees that shooting a gun (even as a warning) is a justifiable response to a group of children, no matter how adorably threatening they can be.
It's okay to admit to the fact that the majority of the population would not feel necessary to shoot a warning shot at a group of kids. I don't know why you feel the need to argue otherwise.
Selective youtube choices do not set the narrative for the majority, anyone can post selective screen shots, but it really doesn't matter even if it did.
None of this is providing a valid rebuttal to my original statement.
Additionally, as a result of his actions, the officer walked away unharmed and the little brats were dealt with.