Seahawks News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

BUTCHER 206

FREE BUTCHER206
Aug 22, 2003
12,316
109,201
113
Seattle, WA
Kris Richards' D was best in the league this year. But, ok.

I can take or leave Bevell at this point. We need a better OL...im looking at you Cable.
Not against elite teams, they simply picked that zone defense apart pretty easy in all of our losses, and it usually took an entire half to adjust, else it happened at the end of the game and caused the loss. I mean how many games was it "just send the TE up the middle seam against these guys, someone will fail to cover it auto touchdown" like fuckin 2-4 times a game multiple times, like 4 occasions. Come on now this defense needs to start getting more creative, the NFL has gotten pretty tough the past few years it's going to take a lot more. Or, it's just a coaching issue.
I think everyone can agree O-line is the top priority lol... definitely need to sign Holding #76, whoops I mean Russell Okung to a good contract. Marshawn Lynch might need to be dropped or already has his own plans so for the draft I'd say nothing but O-Line, maybe one receiver if they think they can steal one away like with Lockett...
 
Last edited:
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
Not against elite teams,
So we didnt hold AZ to 6 points in week 17? Sweet.

they simply picked that zone defense apart pretty easy in all of our losses, and it usually took an entire half to adjust, else it happened at the end of the game and caused the loss.
85% of our losses were in the first half of the season.

I mean how many games was it "just send the TE up the middle seam against these guys, someone will fail to cover it auto touchdown" like fuckin 2-4 times a game multiple times, like 4 occasions.
Every team has weaknesses. No one is perfect. Yes, our LB's and DB's seemed out of place, but you need to maybe look at the DB and LB coaches for that, not Kris.

Come on now this defense needs to start getting more creative, the NFL has gotten pretty tough the past few years it's going to take a lot more. Or, it's just a coaching issue.
.
Again, best defense in the league. This statement makes zero sense.
 
Last edited:

BUTCHER 206

FREE BUTCHER206
Aug 22, 2003
12,316
109,201
113
Seattle, WA
So we didnt hold AZ to 6 points in week 17? Sweet.



85% of our losses were in the first half of the season.



Every team has weaknesses. No one is perfect. Yes, our LB's and DB's seemed out of place, but you need to maybe look at the DB and LB coaches for that, not Kris.



Again, best defense in the league. This statement makes zero sense.
This defense is far from being the best defense in the league. Some clamping down at the end padded some stats and we ended up #2 by numbers, but numbers dont mean shit when you get blown out 31 points to lose a divisional playoff game. I don't know what game you watched yesterday but the way Carolina could get 1st downs at will with huge gaping holes in our zones looked a lot like when we were 2-4. It's been the same shit all year and hasn't been fixed, just some teams are better at executing it than others. And it was never more glaringly obvious than yesterday, turnovers are a huge problem we can't capitalize on fumbled balls or get interceptions to save our lives anymore.

It's time for coaches to be held accountable, and time to move on from Bevell's offense and to an offense centered around Russell Wilson and moving the ball aggresively and up-tempo at all times.
 
Last edited:

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,363
13,861
113
39
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Richard Sherman probably wouldn’t have been expected to say anything else.

But in the haze of a locker room while trying to make sense of the 31-24 playoff defeat Sunday against Carolina, the Seahawks cornerback said there was one thing he knew — that the Seahawks will be right back in the middle of the Super Bowl hunt in the 2016 season.

“One hundred percent,’’ he said when asked if he thinks the Seahawks are still a team on the rise.


“Because we are still young. I think people get confused sometimes, like our quarterback is 38 (Russell Wilson is 27). Bobby Wagner is 25. We have a young corps. I think people have been astounded by what we have been able to do in our young years. But we are far from done. Guys are just entering their prime, and we are going to be special for a long time.’’

PANTHERS 31, SEAHAWKS 24

Gallery | Highlights | Box score

Top Stories
What national media are saying
Seahawks' season ends with 31-24 loss
Stone: Wilson's appeal saves Hawks from humiliation, can't save season
Calkins: Bitter loss leaves Hawks wondering what could have been
Sports world on Hawks' near-epic comeback: 'Best way to lose a game'
Has Jermaine Kearse played his last game with the Seahawks?
Marshawn Lynch has little impact

Complete game coverage »

Still, the Seahawks of 2016 inevitably will look different.

They could have at least 17 unrestricted free agents.

That includes nine players who are starters or regulars in the rotation — left tackle Russell Okung, right guard J.R. Sweezy, receiver Jermaine Kearse, defensive tackles Brandon Mebane and Ahtyba Rubin, linebacker Bruce Irvin, cornerbacks Jeremy Lane and DeShawn Shead and punter Jon Ryan.

All would be free to sign with another team starting March 9 if they have not re-signed with Seattle.

Okung is representing himself, and he is expected to test the waters.

Irvin’s contract option for 2016 was not exercised by the Seahawks in May, and he also is expected to test free agency.

Irvin sat at his locker for an extended time Sunday, saying he knew the game could be his last with Seattle. He said he didn’t want to take off his shoulder pads.


“I hope to be back,’’ Irvin said.

A few other players will be restricted free agents (meaning the Seahawks can keep them, or at least guarantee compensation, by giving them a qualifying offer), notably guard Alvin Bailey, center Patrick Lewis, fullback Derrick Coleman and running back Christine Michael.

Then there are maybe the most interesting and potentially pivotal decisions on players the Seahawks could release or trade in salary-cap moves, notably running back Marshawn Lynch and maybe strong safety Kam Chancellor.


Lynch turns 30 in April and played just seven regular-season games and one postseason game this year. The Seahawks could save $6.5 million against the cap by releasing him.

Chancellor, meanwhile, held out the first two games and returned without any resolution to his contract situation.

His contract runs through the 2017 season but the Seahawks could save $4.1 million in 2016 and $7.1 million in 2017 by releasing him. (The Seahawks made a similar move with Red Bryant after the 2013 season.)

Defensive end Michael Bennett also has been unhappy with his contract, and though he has two years remaining on the four-year, $28.5 million deal he signed in 2014, he also could again ask for a renegotiation.

Bennett said last week nothing had changed with his stance, that he thinks he has outplayed his contract.

“My position is always the same,’’ he said. “I think I’m one of the best defensive linemen in the NFL, and I could play any position. I let it unfold when it comes around.”

The results of the weekend also mean Seattle will have the 26th selection in the first round of the 2016 NFL draft.

Coach Pete Carroll echoed the thoughts of Sherman in saying the expectations will be the same going forward.

“These guys are coming back strong,’’ Carroll said. “They are already talking about coming back next time around. That’s all they know. That’s all that we are








And thr mass exodus with 24m cap space begins :)
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Richard Sherman probably wouldn’t have been expected to say anything else.

But in the haze of a locker room while trying to make sense of the 31-24 playoff defeat Sunday against Carolina, the Seahawks cornerback said there was one thing he knew — that the Seahawks will be right back in the middle of the Super Bowl hunt in the 2016 season.

“One hundred percent,’’ he said when asked if he thinks the Seahawks are still a team on the rise.


“Because we are still young. I think people get confused sometimes, like our quarterback is 38 (Russell Wilson is 27). Bobby Wagner is 25. We have a young corps. I think people have been astounded by what we have been able to do in our young years. But we are far from done. Guys are just entering their prime, and we are going to be special for a long time.’’

PANTHERS 31, SEAHAWKS 24

Gallery | Highlights | Box score

Top Stories
What national media are saying
Seahawks' season ends with 31-24 loss
Stone: Wilson's appeal saves Hawks from humiliation, can't save season
Calkins: Bitter loss leaves Hawks wondering what could have been
Sports world on Hawks' near-epic comeback: 'Best way to lose a game'
Has Jermaine Kearse played his last game with the Seahawks?
Marshawn Lynch has little impact

Complete game coverage »

Still, the Seahawks of 2016 inevitably will look different.

They could have at least 17 unrestricted free agents.

That includes nine players who are starters or regulars in the rotation — left tackle Russell Okung, right guard J.R. Sweezy, receiver Jermaine Kearse, defensive tackles Brandon Mebane and Ahtyba Rubin, linebacker Bruce Irvin, cornerbacks Jeremy Lane and DeShawn Shead and punter Jon Ryan.

All would be free to sign with another team starting March 9 if they have not re-signed with Seattle.

Okung is representing himself, and he is expected to test the waters.

Irvin’s contract option for 2016 was not exercised by the Seahawks in May, and he also is expected to test free agency.

Irvin sat at his locker for an extended time Sunday, saying he knew the game could be his last with Seattle. He said he didn’t want to take off his shoulder pads.


“I hope to be back,’’ Irvin said.

A few other players will be restricted free agents (meaning the Seahawks can keep them, or at least guarantee compensation, by giving them a qualifying offer), notably guard Alvin Bailey, center Patrick Lewis, fullback Derrick Coleman and running back Christine Michael.

Then there are maybe the most interesting and potentially pivotal decisions on players the Seahawks could release or trade in salary-cap moves, notably running back Marshawn Lynch and maybe strong safety Kam Chancellor.


Lynch turns 30 in April and played just seven regular-season games and one postseason game this year. The Seahawks could save $6.5 million against the cap by releasing him.

Chancellor, meanwhile, held out the first two games and returned without any resolution to his contract situation.

His contract runs through the 2017 season but the Seahawks could save $4.1 million in 2016 and $7.1 million in 2017 by releasing him. (The Seahawks made a similar move with Red Bryant after the 2013 season.)

Defensive end Michael Bennett also has been unhappy with his contract, and though he has two years remaining on the four-year, $28.5 million deal he signed in 2014, he also could again ask for a renegotiation.

Bennett said last week nothing had changed with his stance, that he thinks he has outplayed his contract.

“My position is always the same,’’ he said. “I think I’m one of the best defensive linemen in the NFL, and I could play any position. I let it unfold when it comes around.”

The results of the weekend also mean Seattle will have the 26th selection in the first round of the 2016 NFL draft.

Coach Pete Carroll echoed the thoughts of Sherman in saying the expectations will be the same going forward.

“These guys are coming back strong,’’ Carroll said. “They are already talking about coming back next time around. That’s all they know. That’s all that we are








And thr mass exodus with 24m cap space begins :)
75% of the players in FA can walk, as most are fillers/up-gradable. Kearse, Mebane, Chancellor and possibly Okung are the only real ones i care about and quite frankly, Okung is always hurt.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
75% of the players in FA can walk, as most are fillers/up-gradable. Kearse, Mebane, Chancellor and possibly Okung are the only real ones i care about and quite frankly, Okung is always hurt.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Plus Seahawks are about maximizing young talent. Look at Locket and what a huge impact he was this year as a rookie and he'll stay on that rookie salary for a few years. You can't just lock up everyone and get old, like my Bears did towards the end of the Lovie Smith era (they gave contracts to EVERYONE on that defense and never planned for the future, so when they got old they got old with no one to replace them), they have to stay fresh. The core guys are locked in contracts so of course they just build around them, bring in young guys to fill spots and hope they perform on a high level, like they've done in years past.

Lynch getting old, while it's sad, it was expected. Honestly he probably played in Seattle 1-2 more years then many people thought. The great thing obviously is they have his replacement in Rawls who was playing far better than Lynch this year. Everyone is excited about Rawls and his youthful energy.

Obviously offensive line is still a priority, it's going to be a challenge trying to figure that out, resign Okung and Sweezy or not, who to draft or bring in FAs, etc.

And obviously they will draft more DBs, they still need to find someone opposite of Sherman and another nickel guy and added depth, probably cut Lane. But this is where Schneider and Carroll are at their best - finding hidden gems in the draft.

Seattle is in a very good position to improve for next year. People like Chree have no idea what their talking about lol. Losing guys like Irvin isn't a big deal at all, it's better actually to free up cap space and get young guys in there early. They really have to try and keep Bennett though, his presence is too valuable to lose and there is no replacing him, so if that means you have to cut Irvin, Lane, etc they have to do it.
 
Last edited:
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Another little annoyance I have is the back to back 10:00am games. They have the early Saturday game at 1:00pm so I don't know why they don't have the same times on Sundays.

Anyways, I read a crazy ass stat that in the four 10:00am playoff games Seahawks have played over the past few years, they've scored ZERO points in the first half of all of those games and something like 86 points in the second half. That's crazy! Clearly these early games are in an issue which of course just stresses the importance of getting a top 1-2 seed. Regardless of that I hate early playoff games, never made much sense to me.