Russia and china warn but don’t really threaten u.s. Over syrian action

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

S.SAVAGE

SICCNESS MOTHERFUCKER
Oct 25, 2011
7,638
88,992
0
113
EAST SAN JOSE
#3
Our military needs a break from this shit. I say let the fuckin Europeans, Britain especially and the other Arabs handle this. They are fully capable to fuck them up if need be.
Man I could not agree with you more, but the down side is they are still looking to protect their biggest interest in the middle east & thats Israel.
 

NAMO

Sicc OG
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
44
#10
Don't trust the media about the chemical weapons, wouldn't be surprised if it was the rebels who have been absolutely BRUTAL and disgusting creatures. 200,000 people die, no big deal, 1,000 die due to chemical weapons and now the US is sending in air strikes in days. Well played.
Exactly.

I guess Obama has evidence but he doesn't need to show us.

Remember when they had WMD evidence in Iraq? That was cool, we are still waiting for that..

-_-
 

Filthy_Rich

My fit cost a rack
Oct 22, 2003
1,032
4,198
113
40
www.officialxraided.com
#11
Exactly.

I guess Obama has evidence but he doesn't need to show us.

Remember when they had WMD evidence in Iraq? That was cool, we are still waiting for that..

-_-
The justification was that Iraq either had or was seeking WMDs. The latter is hard to disprove. Funny though, Bush got congressional approval before going to war, twice. Obama didn't get congressional approval for Libya and hasn't sought approval for Syria. He also doesn't have UN approval which is something he once said was required.
 

Rasan

Producer
May 17, 2002
19,730
24,632
113
44
Chula Vista, South Bay, San Diego, California
#12
Don't trust the media about the chemical weapons, wouldn't be surprised if it was the rebels who have been absolutely BRUTAL and disgusting creatures. 200,000 people die, no big deal, 1,000 die due to chemical weapons and now the US is sending in air strikes in days. Well played.
im lost here. so if we rebelled against our government and the national guard used chemical weapons as a means to stop us, will another country come save the day? wtf.
another day and another meaningless war.
 

Nuttkase

not nolettuce
Jun 5, 2002
38,746
159,554
113
44
at the welfare mall
#13
Once again there will never be a WWIII. I really wish people would stop saying that. One of two things will happen after this warning even if we go full force at Syria (not that we should), nothing (likely) or the great/super powers of the world blow the whole planet up with nuclear weapons (less likely). The days of World War I & II type warfare are far removed when involving great/super powers.
 

Rasan

Producer
May 17, 2002
19,730
24,632
113
44
Chula Vista, South Bay, San Diego, California
#17
Once again there will never be a WWIII. I really wish people would stop saying that. One of two things will happen after this warning even if we go full force at Syria (not that we should), nothing (likely) or the great/super powers of the world blow the whole planet up with nuclear weapons (less likely). The days of World War I & II type warfare are far removed when involving great/super powers.
the super powers dont wanna see that happen anyway. good points.
 
Props: Nuttkase

NAMO

Sicc OG
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
44
#19
The justification was that Iraq either had or was seeking WMDs. The latter is hard to disprove. Funny though, Bush got congressional approval before going to war, twice. Obama didn't get congressional approval for Libya and hasn't sought approval for Syria. He also doesn't have UN approval which is something he once said was required.
They did have chemical weapons that the US sold to them prior to the war they had with Iran. They used them in Halabja.



Obama won't get UN approval, the Russians and China will VETO.

This is Yugoslavia all over again, the US will bomb the shit out of Syria and destabilize the middle east even further, as if it wasn't destabilized enough..
 
Last edited:

NAMO

Sicc OG
Apr 11, 2009
10,840
3,257
0
44
#20
UK won't join military action either..

BBC News - Syria crisis: Cameron loses Commons vote on Syria action

MPs have rejected possible UK military action against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government to deter the use of chemical weapons.

David Cameron said he would respect the defeat of a government motion by 285-272, ruling out joining US-led strikes.


Looks like it's you guys and france..