gimpypimp said:
It's funny that you say Kobe doesn't have anyone around him. This is the same team that has one the championship the last 3 years in a row. So what if Shaq is out...other people need to step up. That's what championship teams/players are supposed to do. It's obvious Kobe can't do that.....
Its funny how you say that now, and not when every other person on this board is saying the Lakers are nothing without SHAQ, where were you then? Im thinking your saying this now cause im justifying the lakers situation without SHAQ's presence. And not bashing them. Your right other players need to step up, but they arent, so kobe has to...
gimpypimp said:
And Van Horn is new to the Sixers. Iverson has been carrying that team for a few years now...regardless of a low FG%.....
Iverson has always has someone, atleast as good as anyone kobe has now. I have something you can do, go and look at the past few years, look at Philly's record, look as they made it to the finals, now i want you to look at the eastern conference record against the western, then look at the east against themselves, you will see how easy it is to cary a team there.
KINGCZAR said:
Real talk Gimpy & MB3!! yall had to school nitro before I got a chance!!! WEll nevermind nitro....read what MB3 & Gimpy said!! Haha!! GOT EM!!!
Schooled? By his first paragraph he went against evertything you have said on this board. He is saying the lakers are something without shaq, as they have "championship players". What the fuck you thinking? You just spotted some laker bashing and quickly agreed, how childish. I find it amusing how you all agree with each other to TRY proving a point, weather or not you even agree with the person. MB3: as long as the person is bashing the Lakers, you could never have said it better your self. Its all hatred, now by Czar's standards, i have just schooled all 3 of you. Good day.