Seahawks News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
If thats true Bennett can fuck off then. Damn man that's pretty faulty to say all that lovey dovey shit to us then want out a year into a 4 year contract. For what? Dude must be coked up or some shit. But I dont think its true
It's been shot down by a bunch of people as being false but who knows, we'll find out within the next few weeks. "Marshawn Lynch demands trade to Oakland!" was popular for a long while, look how that turned out.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
NFL Power Rankings: Seahawks sit above Super Bowl champs - NFL.com


RANK 1

SEAHAWKS


Seattle is the new old No. 1. The Jimmy Graham trade certainly put this team a few nautical miles north of interesting. Now the pass rush could be bolstered if John Schneider can land Greg Hardy -- unless the Cowboys snag him first. Heck, Michael Bennett and Hardy would be quite the duo, and Bennett could teach him how to jump offsides as efficiently as he does -- unless, of course, Bennett ends up heading elsewhere. Meanwhile, the biggest move the Seahawks made -- and why they are at the top of these rankings -- was keeping Marshawn Lynch in house. He is truly a difference-maker, a modern-day John Riggins. Between him and Graham, who do you defend from the 1-yard line? Ricardo Lockette, of course.






RANK 23

49ERS

Imagine becoming a full-time, bona fide NFL head coach for the first time, and then in your first month on the job, watching your roster slowly come apart. Patrick Willis is done. Justin Smith is likely to follow him out the door. Frank Gore is gone. One of the best guards in football in Mike Iupati is gone. Both starting corners from last year have peaced out. And now Chris Borland retires. Although, in his case, I applaud the courage it takes to quit something you love, and to have the confidence to pursue something else. No matter what, Tomsula is fielding a weaker team today than Jim Harbaugh did in December. That's why it is so important that the Torrey Smith and Darnell Dockett signings, as well as the draft in April, work out for the franchise.
__________________________________________________________

LOL
 

BUTCHER 206

FREE BUTCHER206
Aug 22, 2003
12,316
109,201
113
Seattle, WA
That would eliminate our pass rush completely though. Which has been a weakness of ours. I dunno though Baldwin and Kearse CANNOT be our entire offense its been pretty solidly proven these past years. When Russell is trying to target these guys it looks terrible how he has to scramble and lob a pass up, each play is like a prayer, cause those guys couldn't get open if even 75% of a person is covering them let alone a double team. So its a huge tradeoff, big offensive boost and a big loss on defense.

This trade goes through... I think itd be pretty clear we're preparing for the loss of Marshawn and moving to a faster paced more pass oriented offense
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
Lol wut? That can't be real. I love Bennett but I'd take that trade any day.
Maybe, but losing your best DL might be a bigger blow than gaining a big time WR. Our pass rush relies on MB and CA to work together to get penetration, which is still hard to come by sometimes. While i love a good offensive football game, defense wins championships, and that is PROVEN.
 

BUTCHER 206

FREE BUTCHER206
Aug 22, 2003
12,316
109,201
113
Seattle, WA
Maybe, but losing your best DL might be a bigger blow than gaining a big time WR. Our pass rush relies on MB and CA to work together to get penetration, which is still hard to come by sometimes. While i love a good offensive football game, defense wins championships, and that is PROVEN.
Our offense lost the Superbowl vs the Patriots. That's proven too.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
Pats shouldn't have scored that much in the first place
Exactly. The SB was a product of our defense playing poorly for most the game. Shit was annoying as fuck. We a) SHOULD have won that game, but b) the amount we scored SHOULD have been enough to beat them with our D, and the last play would have never occured. Neither happened. The rest is history.
 

BUTCHER 206

FREE BUTCHER206
Aug 22, 2003
12,316
109,201
113
Seattle, WA
Exactly. The SB was a product of our defense playing poorly for most the game. Shit was annoying as fuck. We a) SHOULD have won that game, but b) the amount we scored SHOULD have been enough to beat them with our D, and the last play would have never occured. Neither happened. The rest is history.
I disagree, it looked like poor play because Lane went down and Avril went down, allowing Bennett to be contained with constant double teams. Not to mention Kam was injured and so was Sherman and Earl Thomas, with injuries that end peoples seasons. They still carried us to within a yard of winning, it was the offense who blew it. It's 50/50 not 75/25
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,356
13,837
113
38
Exactly. The SB was a product of our defense playing poorly for most the game. Shit was annoying as fuck. We a) SHOULD have won that game, but b) the amount we scored SHOULD have been enough to beat them with our D, and the last play would have never occured. Neither happened. The rest is history.
Lmao they got exposed like hot nurses in the sb
 
Props: BUTCHER 206