Manny Pacquiao ready to fight Shane Mosley, possibly on Oct. 17th

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

who would win?

  • Mosley by decision

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Too close to call/draw/undecided

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
wow, this is crazy. Manny is a G for risking his fight with mayweather and taking on Sugar Shane first. It all comes down to if Mosley can agree to get down to 144 pounds or not, he says he will so we'll see....




Manny Pacquiao Agreed To Face Shane Mosley


MANILA, Philippines – Not one to back down from a challenge, Manny Pacquiao on Wednesday said he’s accepting the dare of Sugar Shane Mosley, who has repeatedly called him out for a showdown.

But the reigning pound-for-pound king reiterated that he would only climb the ring against Mosley if both their camps would agree on the terms of the fight.

“Walang problema, pwede kaming maglaban basta magkakasundo sa negosasyon," Pacquiao told 24 Oras in an interview from his hometown General Santos City.

Weight issues and money matters remain major considerations in choosing Pacquiao’s opponent for his next outing on October 17.

The camp of the reigning 140-lbs champ wants to set a catch weight should he fight Mosley, the WBA 147-lbs king. And being boxing’s top attraction, the Filipino ring icon would not settle for anything less than a 60-40 split on the purse.

But it appears Mosley is willing to make concessions to meet Pacquiao.

Quoted in a BoxingScene.com report, Mosley said: “I feel I am the best fighter in the world and I am willing to prove it by fighting Manny Pacquiao at a catch weight."

He said he’s ready to go down as low as 144-lbs for the Pacman.

"My last fight, I made 147 easily and feel that I can go down a little bit further to make a matchup between myself and Manny Pacquiao happen. A few pounds maybe 144 we would have to see what is best for all involved," he said.

“I was never a 154lb fighter to begin with. I did those fights just for the matchups. I was a small Junior Middleweight," he added.

Apart from weight concessions, Mosley claimed he would be easier to negotiate with – in terms of purse share - unlike the rest of the entries to the Pacquiao derby like Floyd “Money" Mayweather, Jr.

"Well, one thing I know is that if they are interested, negotiations for this fight would go a lot smoother than what they would for Mayweather, who would demand the lion's share or do everything he can not to make that fight happen. I know that Manny and (Pacquiao trainer) Freddie Roach both want this fight as they know that I won't run, stink the place out or complain about my hands like Floyd would," he said.

Mosley and Mayweather are two of candidates for the Pacman derby along with Pacquiao’s fellow Top Rank fighter, Miguel Cotto, and even old rival Juan Manuel Marquez should he turn the tables on Mayweather in their July 18
encounter.

http://www.gmanews.tv/story/163978/Pacquiao-ready-to-accept-Mosleys-challenge


NOTE: Haven't seen this reported on other sites yet, so take it for what it's worth but it sounds legit.

EDIT: Has been confirmed on Filipino TV, from pacman's own mouth.


____________________________________
____________________________________
Tale of the Tape


Manny Pacquiao
49-3 (KO 37)
5′ 6½″
67″ reach
Southpaw
Last 5 Fights: Ricky Hatton TKO 2, Oscar De La Hoya RTD 8, David Diaz TKO 9, Juan Manuel Marquez SD, Barrera UD.



VS

Shane Mosley
46-5 (KO 39)
5′ 9″
74″ reach
orthodox
Last five fights: Margarito TKO 9, Mayorga KO 12, Cotto UD Loss, Collazo UD, Vargas TKO 6.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#3
Confirmed!!

Manny Pacquiao Tells Shane Mosley - Lets Do It!

Los Angeles, CA—Pound-for-pound king Manny Pacquiao has agreed to meet WBA Welterweight Champion “Sugar” Shane Mosley in a mega-fight at a catch weight.

In an interview today with Filipino news organization GMA News, Manny Pacquiao agreed to Mosley’s dare to meet in the ring. “No problem, we can fight. As long we negotiate," Pacquiao said from his hometown, General Santos City.

Mosley countered, “Now that Manny has stated that he is ready to fight me, the only thing left to finish are negotiations. Richard Schaefer and Bob Arum are working out the details now. I will be ready to fight Pacquiao on October 17th.

Mosley has agreed to a 40-60 split and is willing to fight at a catch weight to meet Pacquiao in the ring.

Mosley last faced Antonio Margarito in January 2009 and delivered a ninth-round knockout. Pacquiao is coming off a second-round knock-out victory over Ricky Hatton in May.

http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=20238
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
46
#7
Should be a good fight... I am leaning more towards Shane Moseley winning a UD because he's bigger and has been in there with better opposition.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#8
What about Mayweather vs Pacquiao?!?!
Mayweather has Marquez in July and I guess pacquiao doesn't want to want around that long.

Mayweather kinda fucked himself if he really wants pacquiao because for one, he waited till the day of the pacquiao/hatton fight to announce his fight, which is in july. He had the option of fighting pacquiao instead of marquez, but for whatever reason he chose marquez.

I actually like this though IF mayweather fights miguel Cotto after marquez, that way it's the perfect bracket imo.

Cotto vs Clottey
Marquez vs Mayweather

Mosley vs Pacquiao
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
#9
OH BOY!

Now this is what boxing is all about right here...This is easily going to be the best fight in along time. Two boxers who aren't afraid to mix it up and let the leather fly.

These are my favorite 2 fighters in all of boxing and I can honestly say I will not be upset regardless of the outcome one bit. But.......I have to give my boy Mosley the benefit of the doubt on this one, I mean i've been a fan of his since I caught one of his early fights back in the mid 90's on ESPN and I knew he would be something special. Someone is going to get KO'd I think and if that doesn't happen it will definitely be a split decision.

I cannot wait for this fight!
 
Dec 9, 2005
11,231
31
0
40
#10
Respect to Manny for once again taking on this challenge.

This is going to be a tough fight for Manny, but I definitely think he can win. I don't know if he can KO Shane, but he can definitely outbox him, IMO.

Shane doesn't have a very good jab, plus I still think Manny has a speed advantage.

I would have loved to see Pacquiao-Mayweather and I thought it was inevitable, which it still might be, but you gotta love how Manny is taking on the best of the best.

Which is more than I can say about the former P4P #1.
 
Dec 9, 2005
11,231
31
0
40
#11
Will Manny be able to take Shane's punch ? This is a dangerous fight for him. Shane's face is made out of the same shit Wolverine's skeleton is made out of.


Hopefully he gets a 142 as opposed to a 144lbs catchweight.
 
Mar 18, 2008
2,009
1,569
0
46
#12
Wow. Just Wow. How can so many people bad mouth Floyd for being the only unbeaten fighter in this on or around weight division. The dude won his first title at 19 against a seasoned veteran fighter, May is far from a punk. Mayweather is like Jordan, great offense and great defence. I hope these other fighters have the same skill set and are not only one dementional fighters cause when it aint klickin on offense your defense plus counter punching can get you back in the game. I just don't think these other fighters are as smart as Floyd. They can't be...their defeated...and he's not.
 
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
#13
Mayweather is overrated. I could understand his cockiness if he actually did fight quality opponents more then a few times and looked impressive doing it...but he hasn't! He has no room to talk tha shit he does and every true boxing fan knows that.
 
Dec 9, 2005
11,231
31
0
40
#14
Wow. Just Wow. How can so many people bad mouth Floyd for being the only unbeaten fighter in this on or around weight division.
Because people question the way in which he maintained that '0'. After he moved up in weight from lightweight, he really didn't fight anyone significant. Henry Brussels ? Baldomir ? Zab 'The Journeyman' Judah ?

The dude won his first title at 19 against a seasoned veteran fighter, May is far from a punk.
In the lighter divisions, he was an absolute beast. He is a punk, and is more afraid of protecting his '0' than he is about proving his greatness, IN HIS DIVISION. He is a welterweight.

Mayweather is like Jordan, great offense and great defence. I hope these other fighters have the same skill set and are not only one dementional fighters cause when it aint klickin on offense your defense plus counter punching can get you back in the game. I just don't think these other fighters are as smart as Floyd. They can't be...their defeated...and he's not.
You sound just like Floyd.

Put so much emphasis on the '0'. Wow. Most impressive victory was against Diego Corrales @ 130. RIP to Chico, he is one of my favorite fighters of all time, but he is definitely not going to go down as an all time great fighter.
 
Feb 13, 2006
835
4
0
46
#15
This is rough. I'm not sure if Pac can take Sugar's punch. Shane's also never been stopped before.

I'm not so sure Arum or Roach would actually let this fight happen. Too much of a high risk with a low reward (money wise).
 
Mar 18, 2008
2,009
1,569
0
46
#16
Put so much emphasis on the '0'. Wow. Most impressive victory was against Diego Corrales @ 130. RIP to Chico, he is one of my favorite fighters of all time, but he is definitely not going to go down as an all time great fighter.
[/QUOTE]

So you tell me who other than Flyod should go down as an all time great. If your answer is none of em, then don't bring it up. The train of thought is Floyd is better than all the current fighters at 140, 147, 154. Tell me who has a better combination of skill on offensive and defense? My opinion is they have all beat journeymen. Pac Man beat Baby Face Assasin, Erik Morales, Oscar, and Hatton at the time when their age was in question or they were just a bumb to begin with (Hatton). Only Shane Mosely and Oscar and Trinidad have taken on opponents on equal terms as far as age and prime fighting ability. Oscar (Tito, Whitaker, Hopkins, Vargas, Obacar?, Quarte) Floyd is still better than all the above with a higher skill level, excluding Hopkins who is just to big.
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#18
I wouldnt worry about Floyd too much. Once one of the top tier fighters lose or show a little weakness I am sure he will take them on and act like he has always been trying to fight them all along. So Mayweather fans, it's only a matter of time before your king takes someone on. In the meantime, he is making someone jump up about 12 pounds. Let's continue his legacy...

Mosley has always been a class act. Win or lose he is still one of the best right now.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#19
So you tell me who other than Flyod should go down as an all time great. If your answer is none of em, then don't bring it up. The train of thought is Floyd is better than all the current fighters at 140, 147, 154. Tell me who has a better combination of skill on offensive and defense? My opinion is they have all beat journeymen. Pac Man beat Baby Face Assasin, Erik Morales, Oscar, and Hatton at the time when their age was in question or they were just a bumb to begin with (Hatton). Only Shane Mosely and Oscar and Trinidad have taken on opponents on equal terms as far as age and prime fighting ability. Oscar (Tito, Whitaker, Hopkins, Vargas, Obacar?, Quarte) Floyd is still better than all the above with a higher skill level, excluding Hopkins who is just to big.
Floyd mayweather may very well be the best fighter today, but there are other active fighters that will rank HIGHER than floyd in the all time great list. Bernard Hopkins*, Manny Pacquiao, Marco Antonio Barrera, Evander Holyfield, Oscar De La Hoya are examples of that. Why? BECAUSE THEY FOUGHT BETTER OPPONENTS!! It's like saying Joe Calzaghe should be ranked higher than hopkins, pacquiao, et al because he retired undefeated, but if you look closely at his record he fought 40 bums, two decent prospects and two 40+ year old past their prime legends.

Mayweather needs to step it up if he wants to be considered on the best ever. After marquez he needs to fight guys like cotto, mosley, and pacquiao. Win those, then yeah, he can claim he's on the greatest of all time.

*Bernard hopkins has fought NOTHING but elite fighters. Look at his most recent fights:
Pavlik - undefeated, undisputed middleweight champ. Ranked top 10 pound 4 pound.
Calzaghe - undefeated, undisputed SM champ. Ranked top 10 pound 4 pound.
Winky Wright - a guy no one ever wanted to fight, ranked top 10 pound 4 pound.
Antonio Tarver - LHW Champ, the man coming off wins over Roy Jones and Glen Johnson. Ranked top 10 pound 4 pound.
Jermain Taylor - undefeated, ranked top 10 pound 4 pound.

So the pattern there? All ranked top 10 pound 4 pound. You simply do not see any other fighter doing that, besides pacquiao really. And sure, hopkins "lost" a couple of those fights, but all were disputed and controversial.

That's the reason why that if floyd and hopkins would retire today, hopkins would rank higher in the top 100 fighters in the history of the game. Hopkins would be ranked between 20-30, wheres floyd would be somewhere between 35-45.

And Whitaker was the original floyd, but better. Look at his resume, look at who he fought, who he beat and the rare occasion he lost or got a draw :)cough: julio cesear chavez:: oscar de la hoya::cough) more than likely they were robberies. Not counting those robberies, Whitaker really should have gone undefeated from 1984 to 1999, by the time he was old and abusing cocaine.

And you're telling me whitaker doesn't have the skill of mayweather?? crazy talk! watch and learn:


Greatest defensive fighter ever.

And on top of that he was more exciting than floyd.


Watch those two video's and tell me whitaker doesn't have his skills.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#20
And retiring undefeated means nothing. Or actually it usually means you didn't fight the best. Rocky Marciano is an example of that.

Who are universally considered the greatest fighters ever? In no particular order:

1). Sugar Ray Robinson - 173 wins and 19 losses
2). Muhammad Ali - won 56 Lost 5
3). Sugar Ray Leonard - 36 Wins, 3 Losses
4). Joe Louis - 65 wins, lost 3
5). Roberto Duran - 103 wins, lost 16
6). Henry Armstrong - 149 win, lost 21
7). Willie Pep - 229, lost 11
8). Sam Langford - 204, lost 46

Not a single fighter is undefeated. And there is a reason for that. They fought the best opponents. You wont see Rocky Marciano in the top 10 p4p greatest list, or calzaghe or mayweather. Or sven ottke!!! It's actually a pretty shameful list, I mean mayweather could retire and have his name next to sven ottke, think about that for a moment.