How about them Broncos?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#41
Orton didnt have Knox who him alone was better for cutler then anything orton had thier.
A rookie receiver who put up 500 yards? Come on bro.

thascary1 said:
Denvers defense wasnt as stellar as you are making it out to be.
Maybe not, but you can't deny they were the unit most responsible for the 6-0 start that made Orton look like a good idea. And Orton's defense was better than Cutler's. Denver had the 7th ranked defense, Chicago was 17th.

thascary1 said:
Forte was stud under orton why not cutler??? Because teams forced the issue and made cutler throw more knowing he would make mistakes.
Forte averaged only 3.9 yards per carry with Orton. He had 1,200 yards and 8 TDs only because he got more carries. Why do you think that is? No confidence in Orton means they go to the ground. By no means was Forte a stud under Orton. He put up good yardage for a rookie and that's why he got the exposure that he did, but he was never a stud. He just had a shitload of carries and the yardage piled up because of it.

thascary1 said:
and im not making the arguement that orton can get better or is a world beater by any means, but cutler will NOT grow and get better either.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see. I believe he will grow.