Boxing News Thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
B

battle619

Sicc OG
#22,502
Feb 10, 2006
2,018
982
113
42
#22,502
2-0-Sixx @2-0-Sixx , you did a good job of throwing Lamberto Quintero @Lamberto Quintero off his game, but he's not talking about who Floyd fought in comparison to LSC. And I'm not comparing Quillin and Garcia to that either. All four foghters have one thing in common and that's their manager, Al Haymon. Haymon presents a blue print to his fighters, Floyd Mayweather and all fighters from GBP 2 years ago, and tells them he will get them huge paydays with low risks. That's why he's getting a lot of fighters to sign. Even Stevenson said that Haymon told him he would be #2 under Floyd. These fighters follow that lead and have no choice but to believe it cuz they do see good paydays for the fighters they are fighting.
 
Props: Lamberto Quintero and Lamberto Quintero
B

battle619

Sicc OG
#22,503
Feb 10, 2006
2,018
982
113
42
#22,503
Maidana (just bear broner for his title)
Canelo (undefeated 154 pound champ)
Guerrero (mandatory)
Cotto (154 pound champ)
Ortiz (just beat Berto for his title)
Mosley (just beat Margarito for his title)

And by the way 2-0-Sixx @2-0-Sixx , you have said Guerrero, Canelo, and Maidana did not belong in the ring with Floyd.
 
Props: Lamberto Quintero and Lamberto Quintero
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#22,504
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#22,504
Lamberto Quintero said:
Ok that's fine. You believe Floyd never ducked anyone and always fought the best? We just disagree breh...I don't think that.
Click to expand...
No I never said he always fought the best, I said he fought the best at 135. Obviously he had some pointless fights in particular the Marquez fight and Guerrero.

And I'd like to know who you think has a better resume of fighters fought...PAC or Floyd? I'm just wondering what you're gonna say.
Click to expand...
I've always said Pac has the better resume. Hopkins has a better resume as well.

It seems you're confused here and think I'm nut hugging Floyd or some shit. You are the one that made the retarded statement that LSC is following what Mayweather does. I'm simply pointing out to you that no, Floyd fought good fighters, he earned his spot. Leo Santa Cruz hasn't fought anyone good and turned down, admittedly ducked, Rigondeaux. Somehow you twist this with me defending everything Floyd does lol.


Bottom line is Floyd got to the top by fighting and beating good opponents. The boxing world doesn't call him pound for pound #1 for no reason. Santa Cruz on the other hand is refusing to fight good opponents. Massive difference.
 
Props: CZAR and CZAR
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#22,506
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#22,506
battle619 said:
2-0-Sixx @2-0-Sixx , you did a good job of throwing Lamberto Quintero @Lamberto Quintero off his game, but he's not talking about who Floyd fought in comparison to LSC. And I'm not comparing Quillin and Garcia to that either. All four foghters have one thing in common and that's their manager, Al Haymon. Haymon presents a blue print to his fighters, Floyd Mayweather and all fighters from GBP 2 years ago, and tells them he will get them huge paydays with low risks. That's why he's getting a lot of fighters to sign. Even Stevenson said that Haymon told him he would be #2 under Floyd. These fighters follow that lead and have no choice but to believe it cuz they do see good paydays for the fighters they are fighting.
Click to expand...
Wait, you're trying to explain to me what Al Haymon does for his fighters? LOL I've been talking about Haymon for years on here. I understand the low risk/high reward strategy of Haymon. But when we're talking about Floyd here, the man has fought good opponents under Haymon as well. He's fought everyone we've wanted him to fight just about besides obviously Pacquiao.

When I'm talking about Leo Santa Cruz, I'm using his own words. The man blatantly ducked Rigondeaux, he did that. Like Rodriguez said, who is managed by Al Haymon, the fighter still has the power to fight who they want to fight. If Leo told Haymon, I want Rigondeaux make it happen, done deal. There is no promotional or network problem like in the case with Floyd/Pacquiao (Top Rank, HBO/Showtime, etc.). The fight is easy to make, if LSC wants it.

battle619 said:
Maidana (just bear broner for his title)
Canelo (undefeated 154 pound champ)
Guerrero (mandatory)
Cotto (154 pound champ)
Ortiz (just beat Berto for his title)
Mosley (just beat Margarito for his title)

And by the way 2-0-Sixx @2-0-Sixx , you have said Guerrero, Canelo, and Maidana did not belong in the ring with Floyd.
Click to expand...
Guerrero yes, and if you see above I said he was one of Floyd's worst opponents. Maidana surprised me. I thought Broner was going to beat him. He gave Floyd a good first fight, which I didn't think he'd be able to do (still not sure if that's a case of me underestimating Maidana or Floyd getting older or a combination of both). Canelo I was on-board with that fight from the get-go. Remember CZAR was talking about Canelo is too big, fuck that fight blah blah blah, I was saying Floyd should fight Canelo. Just because I thought Floyd would beat him doesn't mean it wasn't a good fight.
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#22,507
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#22,507
Lamberto Quintero said:
I'm just comparing Floyd's management to Leo's...they are under the same blueprint under haymon like battle says. That's my point.
Click to expand...
But that's not how it started. If you want to make a statement saying something like Haymon sucks, etc., I would agree with you 10,000%. But what started this debate is that you were defending Leo, saying he's smart and it's good business, etc. That I disagree with.
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#22,509
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#22,509
Lamberto Quintero said:
How is it not good business tho? El chakal would make him look bad, hurting his stock as a fighter. To me, can't do worse business than that.
Click to expand...
Well, myself and naner already talked about why it's bad business. Just because he would lose doesn't mean people wouldn't watch him fight anymore! This is boxing, guys lose, doesn't matter. Look at Cotto, look at all the top guys, it happens. Canelo lost to Mayweather, did it hurt his stock? He's still the top Mexican fighter in the world. Like I said before, Leo is being clowned on right now all over social media. His reputation is damaged, he looks like a coward/bitch, etc. He needs to fight good opponents and since he's not, people are getting sick of it. If he would have fought Rigondeaux and lost, he would at least get respect for fighting the best. Same thing happened to Adonis Stevenson. Look at how much his ratings dropped. That's not smart business.
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#22,511
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#22,511
Lamberto Quintero said:
^ I said I hear you guys...but Leo's not the only fighter that ducks fights where the styles obviously will make him look bad. I'm not saying it's right, but that is boxing these days and Leo is definitely not the only one. Just seems like people want to believe that he is.
Click to expand...
Plenty of guys get called out, man. A duck is a duck doesn't matter who it is. Usually there is some kind of excuse though, or a legit problem like promoters or the networks, Leo just flat out admits to ducking.

The thing with Leo is that he is in the same weight class as Rigondeaux and Rigondeaux is a unified title holder and is the lineal champion. It's not as if Rigondeaux is just another title holder, he is THE MAN in the weight class. How embarrassing is it for Leo to not even want to be champion of his own weight class? He's not even willing to try lol.
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#22,513
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#22,513
Lamberto Quintero said:
Fighters use excuses like networks and promotion companies to duck! You know this breh! A duck is a duck, you're right. And there is no acceptable excuse for ducking other than ducking. But issues like different networks and promotional companies have been resolved for fights before...
Click to expand...
Sometimes there are legit problems though. If a guy has a contract with HBO, and another a contract with Showtime, the fight can't happen unless there is a joint PPV. If the two fighters aren't PPV worthy fighters, the fight can't happen. So unfortunately there are legit reasons why some fights can't happen.

*The only time they can is if the fight is ordered by a sanctioning body and it goes to a purse bid (Lara vs Vanes is an example). Unfortunately there is no such thing at this present time of a mandatory unification fight (like the WBA and WBC can't order their own champions to fight each other, that may change though).
 
CZAR

CZAR

Sicc OG
#22,519
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
51
#22,519
Damn Lamberto that was one hellavu schooling by 206. If I was you I would quit while your behind lol. Talking about Floyd ducking fighters when they were two weight classes lower hahahah. Classic dog. Got Em!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom