2015 Ford F-150

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,017
1
45
#1


2015 Ford F-150

A beer can powered by a soda bottle.

OCTOBER 2014 BY ERIC TINGWALL


Aluminum cans are all the rage in the craft-brewing industry. Once a symbol of cheap and tasteless beer, cans seal more tightly than do glass bottles, better protect their contents from UV degradation, and reduce the expense and energy that come with shipping a truck full of brews to your local depot. Get past the stigma imprinted by 40-plus years of Miller Lite, and cans are the perfect vessel for high-end beer.

In the light-duty-truck world, beer cans are either all the rage or the ammunition for all of your rage, depending on which automaker's logo your Calvin decal is pissing on. The aluminum-bodied 2015 Ford F-150 brings huge weight savings for America’s bestselling vehicle. You’d think this would be universally accepted as innovation, progress, and a generally good thing. But in the vernacular of a Chevy or Ram loyalist, beer cans take on a condescending connotation, as in “I’d never drive a truck made out of beer cans.” These people prefer their trucks be made from SpaghettiOs cans, apparently.

They don’t take the beer-can analogy lightly at Ford. It’s to the point that F-150 marketing boss Doug Scott needs 13 syllables every time he mentions the lightweight metal. "High-strength, military-grade aluminum alloy" purged as much as 500 pounds from the cab and bed of the new truck. The single significant piece of steel in the body is the laminated firewall, designed to keep unseemly sounds out of the cabin. With more than three times as much high-strength steel as in the outgoing truck, the underlying frame sheds between 60 and 70 pounds. Lighter seats, leaf springs, and lower control arms contribute to a claimed total reduction of up to 700 pounds per truck.

READ MORE: 10 Things You Didn’t Know About the 2015 Ford F-150
http://www.caranddriver.com/10-things-you-didnt-know-about-the-2015-ford-f-150

We’re always skeptical of manufacturer weight claims, though. When the latest Land Rover Range Rover adopted aluminum construction, its maker claimed a loss of more than 900 pounds. Our scales proved that the diet actually dropped fewer than 400 pounds model-to-model. So our first order of business with the 2015 F-150 was to steer away from the Ford-prescribed drive route and follow the big-rig breadcrumbs to the nearest certified truck scale in Comfort, Texas. Our test subject, a Ford F-150 King Ranch crew cab equipped with four-wheel drive and the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, carried a price tag heavier than a truck made of lead: $61,465. Its actual weight, however, came in at 5580 pounds. Our comparative truck, a 2013 Ford F-150 Limited EcoBoost V-6 that we previously tested in Michigan, landed at 6029 pounds. The difference: 449 pounds.

The mathematicians among us will note that 449 isn’t 700. Still, that differential is large enough that we’re taking Ford at its word, because if we’re being honest, we have to point out that we’re comparing well-equipped apples to slightly elongated, fully loaded apples here. Our 2013 test truck wore the standard five-and-a-half-foot bed whereas our 2015 F-150 was equipped with an extra foot of bed length and the commensurate stretched wheelbase. Our reference truck came in Limited trim; the new King Ranch packed on the pounds with indulgences like a panoramic glass roof. Identically equipped new and old F-150s might not be 700 pounds apart, but we’re confident that the spread would be more than 600 pounds.



A BEER CAN POWERED BY A BOTTLE OF SODA
If an aluminum body is controversial, a 2.7-liter V-6 in a full-size truck ranks as blasphemy. (A freebie for those who hate F-150s and love bad analogies: You can buy a 3.0-liter of Stars & Stripes cola at Dollar Tree.) But Ford’s new EcoBoost engine is packed with technology and punches above its displacement with output ratings of 325 horsepower and 375 lb-ft of torque. It uses twin turbochargers and direct injection like the 3.5-liter EcoBoost engine, augmented with robust hardware such as a compacted-graphite-iron block, cracked main caps, and cylinder heads with integrated, water-cooled exhaust manifolds. (For more, read our deep dive on the engine.) The smallest six-cylinder pulls confidently low in the rev range and offers exceptional refinement in terms of noise, vibration, and power delivery. It’s worth every penny of the $795 premium over the base engine.

It’s a similar story with the 3.5-liter EcoBoost V-6, a carry-over from last year that stands above the V-8 in price and performance. When we hitched 9000 pounds of cargo trailer to the 385-hp 5.0-liter V-8, we missed the 33 additional pound-feet of turbocharged torque from the EcoBoost engine. Not to mention, the boosted V-6 engines emit a convincing eight-cylinder growl that’s tracked into the cabin via software that monitors the engine rpm and the torque demand. What Ford calls “sound enhancement” is quietly included in upper trim levels to amplify the otherwise-quiet 2.7-liter and 3.5-liter EcoBoost engines.



The only engine that we were unable to sample was the F-150’s base engine, the 283-hp naturally aspirated 3.5-liter V-6, which tags in to replace the 3.7-liter six. While it’s essentially a fleet-buyer special, the base engine can now be paired with a four-wheel-drive crew cab, courtesy of the lighter body.

READ MORE: 5 Cool Ways Ford Stripped Weight from the 2015 F-150 Chassis
5 Cool Ways Ford Stripped Weight Out of the 2015 F-150’s Chassis – News – Car and Driver | Car and Driver Blog

Ford had some catching up to do in ride quality and rigidity, and this truck delivers. The F-150 exhibits a smooth ride and a structure that calms—but doesn’t eliminate—the secondary ride motions that ripple through a truck when you run over choppy pavement. It displays better body control than the Ram 1500 and offers a cabin that’s about as quiet as that of the Silverado. The steering is a touch on the light side yet accurate and responsive. Only the brake pedal, being touchy and failing to deliver any feedback, needs further improvement.



Ford says to expect fuel-economy gains of 5 to 20 percent over last year’s figures thanks to the aluminum diet. For those who use their pickups for work, though, the real advantage of an aluminum body is that weight taken out of the truck can be used to raise towing and payload capacities. The F-150 now claims the highest maximum ratings of any light-duty truck in the country, at 12,200 pounds of towing and 3300 pounds of in-bed capability. Two regular-cab, base-engine models, however, do see decreases in their load-carrying abilities, one by as much as 200 pounds.

THE HIGH-TECH, LUXURY PICKUP TRUCK
The F-150 King Ranch cockpit could upstage a Lincoln. And no matter the trim level, your elbows, hands, and butt fall on nice-enough materials. However, the dash plastics are still relatively low-rent, and the fit and finish fall well behind what Chevrolet and Ram have achieved.

New features abound both inside and out, elevating the air of luxury and technology. There’s an optional, large digital screen between the analog tachometer and speedometer, a 360-degree camera system, spotlights in the side-mirror housings, a remote-release tailgate, and cargo-box lamps located in the bedsides. The best innovations, though, might be the simplest ones. There’s now a flat floor in the cabin so you can actually stack boxes when you fold the rear seats, and the new BoxLink system adds four anchors in the sides of the bed that allow drivers to hook in tie-downs, bungee cords, or E-track, a cargo-management system familiar to those who move snowmobiles, ATVs, and the like in trailers.


For all the toys and gizmos, though, the F-150 doesn’t have it all. There are no adaptive dampers, the six-speed automatic transmission is the same as before, and there’s no sign of a hybrid or diesel powertrain on the horizon. This is the price of the massive upfront investment required to develop an aluminum architecture. Luxuries like the 10-speed gearbox under development in a joint project with GM can be implemented throughout the F-150’s life, providing juicy fodder for midcycle updates.




FULL-SIZE PRICES
Despite aluminum’s cost premium over steel, Ford kept price increases for its F-150 to less than $500 in some cases, but that doesn’t temper the shock of just how expensive full-size trucks have become. We drove a low-spec four-door XLT model with the 2.7-liter EcoBoost V-6, cloth seats, rear-wheel drive, and relatively few creature comforts that carried a sticker price of $42,875. That’s a problem that doesn’t plague just Ford, but the entire full-size-truck segment.

If you’re going to spend that kind of money on a truck, though, the F-150 best justifies its price. Its aluminum body and bed mark a sea change in an industry that so often drifts with the current. Just as aluminum often indicates top-shelf beer these days, the lightweight metal is also an indicator of a better truck. Those who abide by the glass-bottle status quo shouldn’t throw stones.​
 

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,017
1
45
#2
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAYa8CXeAhE[/VIDEO]

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23O-hS-r0gQ[/VIDEO]

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcWyQbXXl-o[/VIDEO]

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzLHw6Nit-A[/VIDEO]
 
Last edited:

DODE

Sicc OG
Dec 30, 2011
1,307
3,801
0
38
#10
4 years ago I bought my brother in law a 99 Ford F150 truck & he loves it, & it's never given him one problem.

if you buy a Ford truck or an iPhone you're a fanboy.

aint that right DODE @DODE ? lol
If you buy a ford truck while driving a mustang while talking on your iPhone while wearing your new Jordan's you're a fanboy

:D
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
#15
I'm curious how well these eco boost engines are going to hold up in 10-20 years or 100k+ miles of towing. My dad used a 1999 F250 and a 1997 Suburban to tow boats and trailers 100's of miles for years. Suburban got over 300k miles on it before he started having major problems. The F250 had a miserable ride but that triton V10 was legit. He has a 2004 F250 now and love it.

If it were me, I'd take a GMC truck over anything else.
 

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,017
1
45
#17
I'm curious how well these eco boost engines are going to hold up in 10-20 years or 100k+ miles of towing. My dad used a 1999 F250 and a 1997 Suburban to tow boats and trailers 100's of miles for years. Suburban got over 300k miles on it before he started having major problems. The F250 had a miserable ride but that triton V10 was legit. He has a 2004 F250 now and love it.

If it were me, I'd take a GMC truck over anything else.

Thats my main issue with Ford right now. When just 1 of the turbos goes out in your 3.5 liter Ecoboost engine, are you gonna be ready to foot the repair bill? And lets not forget that 3.5 engine is twin turbo charged, god forbid they BOTH go out. I dont know if the smaller 2.7 v6 is a tt.

I just want to see how the Ecoboosted engines stand the test of time doing their daily work duties as they do.
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
#19
Thats my main issue with Ford right now. When just 1 of the turbos goes out in your 3.5 liter Ecoboost engine, are you gonna be ready to foot the repair bill? And lets not forget that 3.5 engine is twin turbo charged, god forbid they BOTH go out. I dont know if the smaller 2.7 v6 is a tt.

I just want to see how the Ecoboosted engines stand the test of time doing their daily work duties as they do.
I didn't even think about them being twin turbo engines to generate that kinda power. I wonder how that works with towing and all that. That's interesting. But turbo/supercharged engines always seem to have reliability issues long term.
 

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,017
1
45
#20
I didn't even think about them being twin turbo engines to generate that kinda power. I wonder how that works with towing and all that. That's interesting. But turbo/supercharged engines always seem to have reliability issues long term.

I hope im here 10 years down the road to see this.