2013 Kansas City Chiefs

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
ArGenTin3

ArGenTin3

Sicc OG
#24
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
#24
you gotta point out that those "weak" schedules are "weak" because the 7-0 Chiefs and 6-1 Broncos have givin' those teams 2 of their losses basically. The Chiefs and Broncos have had damn near identical schedules sofar.

Houston is a better team without Schaub too. The only thing that has screwed their record up has been his turnovers. Take away those and its a different story. They're still top 5 in both total offense and total defense.
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#25
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#25
I'm just being honest man Chiefs and Denver have had easy schedules so far (well Denver played a far better team in the Colts than anyone KC played). That's why I'm not sold yet. Like I said defense is really good gotta worry about that offense though, if a team happens to score 20+ points might be in some trouble.
 
Props: DFresh77 and Jaysav
Meta4iCAL

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
#32
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#32
JLMACN said:
For the restaurant he ate at it is a big tip......
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure everyone knows that. savage @savage was just being sarcastic. You queefs aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer, huh? I guess all that inbreeding does have some negative effects huh?
 
ArGenTin3

ArGenTin3

Sicc OG
#35
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
#35
2-0-Sixx said:
Such a weak schedule. Barely squeeks by Houston who lost four in a row with back up QB. Not sold. Defense is solid though!
Click to expand...
not sold on you guys either breh.


only 135 total yards of offense last night? that defense was pretty suspect for most the game aswell. i liked that goal line stand when it mattered though.
 
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#36
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#36
ArGenTin3 said:
not sold on you guys either breh.


only 135 total yards of offense last night? that defense was pretty suspect for most the game aswell. i liked that goal line stand when it mattered though.
Click to expand...
Difference is Seattle is currently playing without their starters on their o-line. They got a guard who's never played left tackle starting until pro bowler Okung comes back. A rookie right tackle starting on the right side. Both starting tackled will be back soon and Harvin comes back next week.

Also Seattle has already proven themselves offensively. Marshan Lynch, Russell Wilson have already proven they have moster games. Last night was a result of a makeshift offensive line.
 
ArGenTin3

ArGenTin3

Sicc OG
#39
Mar 24, 2006
4,804
476
0
45
#39
2-0-Sixx said:
Youngest doesn't mean worst. The guy currently playing Left Tackle isn't even a tackle he's a guard. Our right guard is a defensive lineman. Right tackle is a 7th round draft pick, a rookie.

It really is a makeshift oline.
Click to expand...
true, youngest doesn't mean worst. but....it does mean its very inexperienced though. our oline is still gelling. the oline and the fact that we have a new qb and a new offensive system is the main culprits on why the Chiefs offense hasn't looked that great this season.
 
Props: JLMACN
2-0-Sixx

2-0-Sixx

Sicc OG
#40
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#40
Of course. I just think we've seen what the best Alex Smith has to offer. He can be a good, efficient QB who manages the ball well and minimizes turnovers. But if the offense needs to be creative and needs points quick, idk how I'd feel with Smith as the guy.

Then again Dilfer won a Superbowl with amazing Defense so it's possible to win that way, but Ravens defense that year was the second greatest defensive team of all time.
 
Props: JLMACN and Jaysav
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom