Xbox leading Next Gen War So Far

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Aug 7, 2003
6,046
1
0
#22
Nofaceki11a said:
ps3 is a more powerfull system alot quieter as well. but ps3 downfall was letting microsoft launch first this time and having a 600 dollar pricetag.
graphical power is very similar. xbox is louder but ps3 is huge and heavy. some 10+ pounds.
 
Oct 30, 2002
11,091
1,888
113
www.soundclick.com
#24
Nofaceki11a said:
ps3 is a more powerfull system alot quieter as well. but ps3 downfall was letting microsoft launch first this time and having a 600 dollar pricetag.
sony didnt have a choice.. this time last year the didnt even have a working model...ps3 was rushed....that will be its downfall..


USA USA USA!!!!!
 
Nov 7, 2002
1,155
111
0
#26
Making it harder to develop games on only turns third party developers to Xbox 360 to cut production time and cost giving Xbox a larger variety of games to pull from at a faster rate. Or at lease an earlier release date on there Xbox title.
 
Nov 7, 2002
1,155
111
0
#27
Thats why right now most third party games were developed on the Xbox 360 and ported over to the ps3. Making those game look and play better on xbox cuz thats what they were developed on.
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
39
#29
PS3 has the CPU that's better, but nobody knows how to use it to make it better.. And 360 has more RAM and a better GPU..

To me, it makes it seem like 360 is more powerful.
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
39
#31
greg said:
once halo 3 hits its a fucking WRAP! shame to, i used to prefer ps2 over xbox, but 360 improved the controller, and its been on since then.
that's how it was for me.. I was a PS2 guy.. But the 360 controller is absolutely perfect.. and Sony fucked up big with the PS3.. If you look back at some of my old posts, I probably have some saying how I think PS3 is gonna be better than 360, but I've totally changed my mind about that after the PS3 pricepoint was announced.
 
Jul 21, 2005
1,361
0
0
39
snypamuzicc.blogspot.com
#32
Robby2Slobby said:
PS3 has the CPU that's better, but nobody knows how to use it to make it better.. And 360 has more RAM and a better GPU..

To me, it makes it seem like 360 is more powerful.
exactly, its not like da PS3 will use all of the CPU neither will the 360. Obviously the GPU and Ram will be used more so y in hell wouldnt sony make it better then microsoft when they had an extra year in designing?
 
Nov 7, 2002
1,155
111
0
#33
They were more worried about there price point for making the console then making a better system. Its all about profit and they felt they had the fan base to stick with them. What they fail to understand if you dont have the games to back up your systems stats you slowly get push out of the market. Sony better take a long hard look at what happen to the dreamcast. Great system didnt have the game title that ps2 had and now saga no longer has a console.
 
Aug 7, 2003
6,046
1
0
#34
Dark Shadow said:
exactly, its not like da PS3 will use all of the CPU neither will the 360. Obviously the GPU and Ram will be used more so y in hell wouldnt sony make it better then microsoft when they had an extra year in designing?
the extra ram would of made the price to sell well over 600 bucks. not a good idea for a $600 price point to begin with, but imagine if it was $650.
 
Nov 7, 2002
1,155
111
0
#37
They should have sacrificed cpu but no its now all about which console has the bigger harddrive who is going to use all that space 120gb or 100gb in downloads. Im more into graphics and how smooth the game runs. Its all about gameplay.