Would you be OK with War if.........

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Nov 8, 2002
1,693
31
48
47
#1
If it Created more jobs, Boosted the Economy, and brought Gas back down to $0.82 gallon.

Just wondering where the line is drawn for War in Peoples mind.


__________________

Gizmo21
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#9
Jester, you have a heart bro.

WRIGS,
I sound like a hippie?
Don't you find it coincedental that it's been 10 years since the Gulf war, and that only now we're going after Saddam?
Is it a coincedence that this shit is going down after we failed to capture Bin Laden? Is it a coincedence that war with Iraq is about to breake after Bush Jr. became president?
And if Saddam is such a big threat, why is it that even his neighbors are willing to help us? Why aren't they affraid that he might drop nukes on them?
Maybe because he doesn't have nukes, yet....
Korea does, why not go after them instead?
Because they have no oil perhaps?
 
May 10, 2002
200
0
16
39
#10
500 000 irakians childrens died during the american embargo...

Madeleine Albright said: "It’s a hard choice, but I think, we, think, it’s worth it."

Too many people died...
 
Sep 30, 2002
193
0
0
39
#11
if it was a war we knew we could win and not have hella people dieing and shyt then it would be aight but this fat ass war I dont think so... I dont think we shoulda even fucked with this in the first place...
LiL KRAZY
 
Nov 8, 2002
1,693
31
48
47
#12
Triton said:
500 000 irakians childrens died during the american embargo...

Too many people died...
How amny Kurds Die there Daily, Persicuted Daily? Men, Women, Kids, Dogs, Cats, Chickens?

Death is a Factor, Just not ours. It may seem like I am talking out My ass on death but reality is, The last Three wars Alies Mostly Died from Friendly Fire or accidents.

People will die either way it just depends on who are expendable.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,618
30
48
#13
it hasnt been 10 years since we fucked with Saddam, we were fuckin with while Clinton was in office as well........dude is a problem plain an simple

an for whoever said "if it was a war we knew we could win"
every War the US ever gets in is one we know we can win........or else they would try ALOT harder to avoid it........its gonna happen, war is part of our history.........
 
Sep 11, 2002
959
0
0
#14
Any country can avoid the war now...I think my country has commited a great mistake takin this hard position because the USA will take the control over Irak and i think the US gov wont let the oil to my country so easily...Anyway Irak and France have had some good deals in the past "nuclear and army for oil"(and not only in the past...) that's the reason why the french gov want to find a "pacific"solution...Anyway this war will have bad consequences...With 9/11 events Ben Laden wanted to create a civilisation war,thanx to Irak War his wish is in a good way...
 
Jun 17, 2002
191
0
0
#15
miggity what im sayin is hes in power over therte, he makes everyone vote for him till he dies he will be the boss. when clinton was in office we didnt have a huge problem like we do now, there were no 9-11 attacks. after the 9-11 attacks bush made it clear that we need to stop terroism, hes a terrist, he has ties to bin laden.

when clinton was in office we did go into iraq to let it be known that we aint fuckin around its just that clinton didnt have the balls like bush, saddam is a terriost so after 9-11 its only common sense taht we need to get him out of his chair.

you know how many children he kills a year estimated.

during the 10yr that its been we have been in iraq that whole time man. its just not shown on tv, there are so many issuse that we dont hear about, we went in to iraq a number of times since the gulf war.

last since we failed on laden we should just give up, i dont think so we need to push for the next at all times to keep out country safe. NO BUDDY KNOWS WHAT HES GUNNA DO OR CAPIBLE OF DOING , HE HIDES ALL SECRETS FROM THE U.N. We dont know if hes got nucler weapons we just dont know. they wont even let there scientist talk to the un without a iraqy soilder watchion cus if he says something wrong they'll blast his ass, is thatfare. u tell mee.

SINCE HE WONT LISTEN AND COOPERATE I SAY WE INVADE CUS HES HIDDING SOMETHING.
 
May 8, 2002
549
0
0
40
#16
No its not worth it.

What do you consider winning?

We have Saddam backed into a corner he cant get out of. When you do that people will do ANYTHING to get out. If we go to war we will get hit up probably with a nuke. Theres a lot of other countrys that dont like us because of shady shit we do. Are those countrys gonna just wait till were done with Iraq to fight us, no they arent. If you want to fight a 8 foot tall 500 pound fool with fists what are you gonna do? You gonna wait till the other fool is done then try to fight him, no because you will lose. Your all gonna go after him at once just like these other countrys are gonna go after us at once. Keep in mind it takes one nuke to beat us. After that the country will go to shit (more so then Bush has made it already).

Its not a matter of being a hippy, its a matter of having some fucking common sense.

NO ONE IS THREATINING TO FIGHT US UNLESS WE FIGHT THEM. its suicide to fuck with us, but when you back someone in a corner they do shit they wouldnt do.

Saddam is a terible person he kills his own people, but how are we saving these people if we kill them aswell. think about

When we go and kill all these familys out there to save them the people will not be happy. There will be a line around the block with people volunteering to give their lives to destroy the US. And honestly I cant blame them, if someone was destroying people that I loved I would volunteer to go give myself up to.
 
May 8, 2002
549
0
0
40
#17
you know how many children he kills a year estimated.
So what your saying is its ok for the US to kill those people but not Saddam, please explain.

didnt have the balls like bush
Will you be saying that when were nuked because Bush wanted to show off his balls?

an for whoever said "if it was a war we knew we could win"
This is not a war we can win, unless you consider Bush living and getting richer while millions of americans die winning. But i sure dont.
 
Jun 17, 2002
191
0
0
#18
no im not sayin it, all im sayin is when it comes down to it saddam is a threat that needs to be dealt with, im not sayin kill those kids im sayin hes killin his own so we need to put a stop to it.

thats my point dranked out , countrys taht cant follow the rules, need to be dealt with, we have to stop the nuke bombs b4 they make it possible to use.
 
Jun 17, 2002
191
0
0
#19
do u think if saddam was invading us he would care about kids, hell no, hed bomb a schol, church anything, we go and invade and dont kill children, but sometimes things go off track and hit the wrong targets, least were not tryin to blow up kids.

u need to look at it as if we wait along were gunna have big problems when the drop bombs on us if we dont act now.

people are guna die, which isnt cool, but people with the usa fight for our country and if ur in the military thats what ur up too.

my 4 cents
 
Jun 17, 2002
191
0
0
#20
danked, ever heard of the un, yah we got alot of fuckin countrys on our side, maybe not in a war with iraq, but when it comes down, other countries are gunna be with us. especially on some nuke shit. nobody wants that but maybe iran, iraq north korea, crazy holes like those