Woman Turns Table On TSA, Gropes Agent

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

mrtonguetwista

$$ Deep Pockets $$
Feb 6, 2003
23,473
7,035
0
82
#21
I have experienced pat down before and the s--t wasnt worth making a fuss about....maybe some people had a "bad" pat down experience.....I always travel light anyway with practically nothing in my pockets so I can get to my gate quicker and avoid any unnecessary situations....

Call it giving up your freedoms if you want...boarding a plane is one of the few places I feel pat downs are necessary....they f--kin do pat downs before you enter most clubs, and I have never heard anyone cry "foul"...but when it comes to boarding a plane "its all bad?"....thats backwards...i'm talking strictly legit/appropriate pat downs...not coppin a feel and s--t....
How would you feel if they patted down your child, like they've done to children in the past and the 91yr old lady who they made remove her "diaper"
 

HIM

Sicc OG
Sep 27, 2002
4,648
1,156
113
41
#23
How would you feel if they patted down your child, like they've done to children in the past and the 91yr old lady who they made remove her "diaper"
Honestly, I am ok with it(would ask them to pat me down first so my son can see that its ok) as long they aint asking my son to remove his diaper or get naked, which they didnt because my wife and my son are coming back tonight from visiting her parents in Ohio....

I'm still for it rather than against it..Not because of people like me, I would never try bring a strap or some off the wall s--t on my person with me on a plane, BUT some people will if the TSA's, etc. didnt exist.....some TSA's might and have taken it too far though...
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#26
not at all.
it might just be me, but if im ready to sacrifice my life for a cause, i dont care where i end up doing so. IF i have to get at TSA agents,i will.
shit even if i get caught and end up in prison, you best believe ill be fighting guards at any chance i get with the intent to kill.

the trade off here is only fucking the US, nobody more.


Since surveillance and communication interception has shown discussion between terrorists highlighting the fact they no longer thought it as viable to attack airplanes and were considering other targets (busses, trains, bridges, etc) I think you are going to need more than just your personal opinion to support that conjecture.
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#28
Since surveillance and communication interception has shown discussion between terrorists highlighting the fact they no longer thought it as viable to attack airplanes and were considering other targets (busses, trains, bridges, etc) I think you are going to need more than just your personal opinion to support that conjecture.
who intercepted them saying so? who are they (intercepted terrorists) to begin with?
do you need them to "intercept terrorists" saying they want to fuck you in the ass so you can have agents at your door tomorrow as you willingly bend over to get a Department of Homeland Security approved butt-plug shoved in your ass?
 
Feb 7, 2011
570
118
0
42
#29
I make security feel uncomfortable when its a woman and she pats me down because I whisper.

"Im enjoying this.. Don't stop, my girl wants to see you grab my shit."

Haha they rush me thru..

The TSA is going to be a bigger issue when they start hireing them for BART and MUNI. etc.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#30
who intercepted them saying so? who are they (intercepted terrorists) to begin with?
do you need them to "intercept terrorists" saying they want to fuck you in the ass so you can have agents at your door tomorrow as you willingly bend over to get a Department of Homeland Security approved butt-plug shoved in your ass?


Flying is a choice, forcing a butt plug in my ass is not. Apples - Oranges. You are better than that.
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#31
youre right, i keep forgetting we live in a primitive world where somebody can copyright thoughts and aerodynamics are not righfully everybodys like walking is.
i forget that the airwaves are controlled. I forget that we live in a world where the apples and oranges you speak of are privately patented.

sorry, you are right
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#32
the problem is really not that you are saying "this is the logical outcome in such a system that is in place" but that you are vouching for such a system that is not yours as if it is, while not realizing how your logic is only relevant to the draconian status quo that you were practically only bred to support.
 
Dec 3, 2009
2,421
48
0
44
#33
I have experienced pat down before and the s--t wasnt worth making a fuss about....maybe some people had a "bad" pat down experience.....I always travel light anyway with practically nothing in my pockets so I can get to my gate quicker and avoid any unnecessary situations....

Call it giving up your freedoms if you want...boarding a plane is one of the few places I feel pat downs are necessary....they f--kin do pat downs before you enter most clubs, and I have never heard anyone cry "foul"...but when it comes to boarding a plane "its all bad?"....thats backwards...i'm talking strictly legit/appropriate pat downs...not coppin a feel and s--t....
Yeah man but people saying they grabbing people nuts??
did they grab your nuts??

Either way. the TSA is bunch of bitches..
and

as you see in the article. only people who fly COMMERCIALLY
go through this.. so the people who own.. and created the TSA
don't go through it... get it now?
they think you are a stupid slave..

Hitler used the lie that terrorism was the reason for his scecurity
forces.. and we all see how that ended up?

If people were smart/. they would boycott all airlines..
and any place that has TSA pat downs.. and anything
that takes away freedom...
not submit and bow down like a bitch... real talk...

I never fly..and I refuse to let some fag grab my nuts..
period
 
Dec 3, 2009
2,421
48
0
44
#34
However if they put hot blondes... that wants to rub me... that would be OK..

but since Im straight.. no guys can touch... period...

The person who posted about taking shorts and a tight tank top..
is a good idea... no way you have anything hidden
if you wear spandex or shorts. or tank tops...

But either way... all this security is a lie..
the gov wants to to live in fear..
and submit.. much like the days of Hitler...

if you study history. he used the very same tactics..
and back then the people were as stupid as they are now..

the good thing is not EVERYONE is as stupid as bakc then...
because back then everyone was for the program...
and didn't question anything.... until they were all being executed in the camps...

But they they are just doing their jobs..
I think the evil SS officers who killed so many said.
the same thing. back then... hmmm..
dosn't take a genuis to see what is going on here..
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#35
youre right, i keep forgetting we live in a primitive world where somebody can copyright thoughts and aerodynamics are not righfully everybodys like walking is.
i forget that the airwaves are controlled. I forget that we live in a world where the apples and oranges you speak of are privately patented.

sorry, you are right

What did my post have to do with any of what you just posted? What does the choice to fly or not have to do with copyrights?

In fact, my logic is the opposite. :confused:

The freedom of choice means, if you don't like the regulations to fly then don't fly. It also means your are free to build your own airplane, charge people in flowers, and screen people however you want - idgaf.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#36
the problem is really not that you are saying "this is the logical outcome in such a system that is in place" but that you are vouching for such a system that is not yours as if it is, while not realizing how your logic is only relevant to the draconian status quo that you were practically only bred to support.


I don't like any system save those that occur without the prerequisite of external forces to sustain them
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#37
What did my post have to do with any of what you just posted? What does the choice to fly or not have to do with copyrights?
i did not think you would really grasp the gist of what im saying anyway.

In fact, my logic is the opposite. :confused:
your sense of freedom is my prison.

The freedom of choice means, if you don't like the regulations to fly then don't fly. It also means your are free to build your own airplane, charge people in flowers, and screen people however you want - idgaf.

to me freedom goes a lil step further than "if you dont like the regulations then dont fly"
to me freedom is another man not impeding on my already "god given" freedom to fly, just like my freedom to walk, freedom to eat fruits not "patented/controlled" by another man, etc.

i dont know how you can live with yourself agreeing that another man somehow has more of a right to live than you do, simply because he said so?
 
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
42
www.idealsentertainment.com
#38
as you see in the article. only people who fly COMMERCIALLY
go through this..
How else would you fly? If you take a private plane and the public is not flying with you, why would anybody need to be searched? What do you think somebody is going to do with a small ass private plane? Take it over and fly it into a tree house? Not many people OWN or take private flights on full-size jets. Those are the ones with all the people on them, and all the fuel in the tanks.
 
Jan 31, 2008
2,764
3,360
113
44
#39
I don't like any system save those that occur without the prerequisite of external forces to sustain them
yes, i understand that. But what we disagree on is the fact that in the end, what you consider a prerequisite of an external force might be the opposite for me.
And unlike most people, i will not abide by your opinion of "needed enforcement" simply because you said so.
you know about anything as much as anybody else.
i say "freedom and liberty" to and for all. THAT to me seems like Natural Law that allows an emergent society to take place over an established "man-made" very primitive and self destructive one.