Why Should I Believe in God?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
#1
Seriously. What if it's all a joke? What if we die & that's it? No heaven, hell, whatever. Is there evidence? And I don't wanna hear anybody say, 'Well the Bible says...,' cuzz what if that's just made up too? What if somebody just made up this whole 'God' thing a long ass time ago to explain things they didn't understand or to help cope with situations that they normally couldn't?
 
Apr 26, 2002
4,128
42
0
42
#2
That what I've been sayin' for a long time now. and If I'm wrong, Then oh well, I guess I'll be kickin' it with you in hell(if there really is one)
 
Dec 2, 2002
3,400
11
0
42
therealtechn9ne.com
#5
dont believe in em n u can burn in hell while most other people r sittin up in the clouds chiefin like injuns all day long 4 eternity

no1 ever said u have to or even said u have to believe to get into heaven

god may not exist but one thing is for sure it isnt a joke
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
48
www.soundclick.com
#8
^^^^
Like I said, you have nothing to lose.
If you die and there's no after life, oh well.
You couldn't do anything about it.

But what if there is an afterlife after all?
Might as well play it safe cuz you never know....
 
Dec 2, 2002
3,400
11
0
42
therealtechn9ne.com
#9
i dont think of god as a man or as a being but as the idea that something had to start off life to exist

cells didnt grow "just because" there was something there or the right combo of "somethings" that r the reason we're alive

you cant just say one day shit was like it is today somethin had to start it off

this reminds of fucking idiot peopl i know who say "well i dont believe in the bible because i believe in creation and not the book of genesis"
these people make me laugh cuz they r sooo dumb. Almost all of the old testament(sp) is symbol stories that r used to teach life lessons and such. they r not to bve take litterally. like adam n eve who r not real people but a symbol of early humans and shit.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#10
@miggidy,

Because you have nothing to lose and everything to gain
First of all, this statment does not indicate which religion to follow. Correct me if I'm wrong, but are you not talking about the belief in "god?" You have to remember that there are many mutually exclusive and contradictory religions out there. This creates a problem. If a person is a follower of one religion, he may end up in another religion's version of hell.

Even if we assume that there's a God, that doesn't imply that there's one unique God. Which should we believe in? If we believe in all of them, how will we decide which commandments to follow?

Secondly, the statement that "If you believe in God and turn out to be incorrect, you have lost nothing" is not true. Suppose you're believing in the wrong God, the true God might punish you for your foolishness. Also, consider the deaths that have resulted from people rejecting medicine in favor of prayer.

Another flaw in the argument is that it is based on the assumption that the two possibilities are equally likely, or at least, that they are of comparable likelihood. If in fact, the posibility of there being a God is close to zero, the argument becomes much less persuasive. So sadly the argument is only likely to convince those who believe already.

Also, if we don't even know that God exists, why should we just believe in him? Isn't it just as likely that God would be angry at people who chose to believe for personal gain? If God is omniscient, he will certainly know who really believes and who believes as a wager. He will spurn the latter... assuming he actually cares at all whether people truly believe in him.

Just my thoughts.

P.S
I watched one of the DVD's last night and I thought it was the shit.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#11
@miggidy,

Because you have nothing to lose and everything to gain
First of all, this statment does not indicate which religion to follow. Correct me if I'm wrong, but are you not talking about the belief in "god?" You have to remember that there are many mutually exclusive and contradictory religions out there. This creates a problem. If a person is a follower of one religion, he may end up in another religion's version of hell.

Even if we assume that there's a God, that doesn't imply that there's one unique God. Which should we believe in? If we believe in all of them, how will we decide which commandments to follow?

Secondly, the statement that "If you believe in God and turn out to be incorrect, you have lost nothing" is not true. Suppose you're believing in the wrong God, the true God might punish you for your foolishness. Also, consider the deaths that have resulted from people rejecting medicine in favor of prayer.

Another flaw in the argument is that it is based on the assumption that the two possibilities are equally likely, or at least, that they are of comparable likelihood. If in fact, the posibility of there being a God is close to zero, the argument becomes much less persuasive. So sadly the argument is only likely to convince those who believe already.

Also, if we don't even know that God exists, why should we just believe in him? Isn't it just as likely that God would be angry at people who chose to believe for personal gain? If God is omniscient, he will certainly know who really believes and who believes as a wager. He will spurn the latter... assuming he actually cares at all whether people truly believe in him.

Just my thoughts.

P.S
I watched one of the DVD's last night and I thought it was the shit.
 
#12
2-0-Sixx said:
[BCorrect me if I'm wrong, but are you not talking about the belief in "god?" You have to remember that there are many mutually exclusive and contradictory religions out there. This creates a problem. If a person is a follower of one religion, he may end up in another religion's version of hell.


Also, consider the deaths that have resulted from people rejecting medicine in favor of prayer.


[/B]
1.Yes, I'm talking about the belief in a 'God' in general. I'm not looking for any particular 'God' of a certain religion, just in general. This question could go out to anyone.

2.This is also what I'm asking. What if those people died in vain?
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,401
584
113
42
#14
i belief in something unnameable, but some call it Tao or in english terms The Way

i believe that everything is everything, we are all born part of a chain, and how ever much we try and fight it, we are all connected(plsatic, person, dog, crip, blood, house, sky etc etc etc)
i believe that thigns come and go, and we must LET GO

it's up to you to find out what to let go, and how, and what it means to let go
i'm still tryin to figure out HOW, but i've found out what it is i need to let go of

here's an excerpt from the Tao Te Ching

"The wise person acts without effort
and teaches by quiet example
He accepts things as they come
creates without possesing
nourishes without demanding
accomplishes without taking credit

Because he constantly forgets himself
he is never forgotten"
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
116
#15
nice view on things moe.

20-sixx. why dont you apply that same logic to politics. i was convinced you had condemned the idea of logic. nice to see you making a little bit of sense for once.
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
48
www.soundclick.com
#16
2-0-Sixx said:
@miggidy,

First of all, this statment does not indicate which religion to follow. Correct me if I'm wrong, but are you not talking about the belief in "god?" You have to remember that there are many mutually exclusive and contradictory religions out there. This creates a problem. If a person is a follower of one religion, he may end up in another religion's version of hell.

Even if we assume that there's a God, that doesn't imply that there's one unique God. Which should we believe in? If we believe in all of them, how will we decide which commandments to follow?

Secondly, the statement that "If you believe in God and turn out to be incorrect, you have lost nothing" is not true. Suppose you're believing in the wrong God, the true God might punish you for your foolishness. Also, consider the deaths that have resulted from people rejecting medicine in favor of prayer.

Another flaw in the argument is that it is based on the assumption that the two possibilities are equally likely, or at least, that they are of comparable likelihood. If in fact, the posibility of there being a God is close to zero, the argument becomes much less persuasive. So sadly the argument is only likely to convince those who believe already.

Also, if we don't even know that God exists, why should we just believe in him? Isn't it just as likely that God would be angry at people who chose to believe for personal gain? If God is omniscient, he will certainly know who really believes and who believes as a wager. He will spurn the latter... assuming he actually cares at all whether people truly believe in him.

Just my thoughts.

P.S
I watched one of the DVD's last night and I thought it was the shit.
True, I didn't specify which God to follow because if one's going to accept the existance of God, one must find the true God.
It's like looking before leaping.
I know that a lot of people leap before looking.
So it comes down to proper education.
And the willingness of an individual to keep an open mind.

I didn't get into any details because the question was, "what if you live a religious life and then you find out there is no God?".
My answer basically was that at least you gave it a shot.
In the end, you end up dead like the rest.
But at least you were willing to gamble.
I kept it in the context of the question.

Back to your question, when I say that one should believe in God because we have nothing to loose. I didn't mean for people to give it a shot for personal gain.
I meant it in a way for people to open up to the idea of a higher power. Jesus said, seek and you will find.
That is very true, once you look for the ultimate reality, you will find it. Now how do you know which scripture is the real deal? Research.... It will become as clear as water.
Jesus said that you can judge a prophet by it's fruit.
How do you know which religion is the real deal? Judge it by it's fruit. But when I say that, judge it by it's "real" fruit. I'm reffering to those who follow their beliefs and not those who claim to be faithful. Their actions are what counts.
For instance, don't judge Muslims for the actions of certain extremists like Bin Laden. No matter what he says, he's not a true Muslim, but a hypocrite.

You mention what about those who die because they choose prayer over medacine. Look at their religion, does their religion ask them to do this? Or are they acting on their own?
I tell you that most people I know who do this act on their own and are not commanded by their religion.
Shame on them for not following the words of God....
No different than the Crusaders who invaded America.
Christ asked his followers to spread his words by example.
Yet these assholes spread it by the sword.
Shame on them for not listenning to what Christ commanded them to do. And for that they will pay dearly, according to the very same scripture they claim to follow.

Ignorance bro....
That's what it comes down to, the lack of education.

But I say any religion of peace is cool.
As long as it teaches peace and not hate, it's cool.
I believe that God has made it possible for anyone to be saved as long as he has a good heart.
Well at least that's what the New Testament says....

PS....
Glad you liked the DVD's, you know they're from a show that was supposed to air on PBS.
It was a series, they made it up to Monopoly Men and then they canned it. It turns out PBS is owned by the Rockefeller family.
Trippy shit....
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,680
69
0
40
www.dreamtdk.com
#18
Personally I have my own reasons for not "believeing", There was a time when I did though, but due to certain events I question God, till' I see any actual proof of a God I will believe in nothing but myself, I don't let anything but my actions control my destiny, what I do is because of me, and what I will do is bcause of me, nothing will change that...
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#20
The main problem is you are looking at it from a "belief" perspective. "Why should I believe in God?" I think a more direct question is "Is there a way I can know whether God exists or not?"

The reason being is that beliefs may change, as you can see from this very post. People say they have believed and then not believed, or not believed and then believed. What does this mean? It means they do not have *knowledge*. They are still on the speculatory platform. "Oh, it *could* be this", "It *might* be that", "I *believe* such and such", etc.

Unless a person makes the transition from belief into *knowledge*, then what value does their belief have? Truth does not change, but what *does* change is our perceptions and beliefs and means of thinking about this unchanging truth. That unchanging truth we all are aware of is God.

He is the Absolute Truth. His existence is not predicated on our beliefs, thoughts, unbeliefs, knowledge, ignorance, or any of that. Absolute means that He exists independent of all things yet is connected to all things.

An easy way to understand the distinction between "belief" and "knowledge", is to examine your own mortality. You do not simply "believe" you are going to die, you don't "think" you are going to die, nor is it an "opinion". You **know** it.

The fact that you *know* something beyond all beliefs and opinions is EVIDENCE that one may possess knowledge of an *objective*, and Absolute Truth.

Death does not care whether you "believe" in it or not, it will come and collect you. Similarly, God does not care whether you "believe" in Him or not, but just like death, it is possible to have knowledge of God: who He is, what His activities are, His attributes, and even to know your destination beyond this inconceivably *short* spot-life of less than 100 years.

But before you can know who God is you should know who *you* are. Are you your body? Are you your mind? Or are you the unchanging *I* which is your consciousness, and which is *aware* of the body and mind within which it resides?

What is that *I*? That *I* is who you are, and who every living entity is. It is not body or mind, or a combination of them, the *I* which you refer to yourself as, is actually a particle of spiritual energy which is contained within a material form. That spark of spiritual energy is your soul. And the active principle which animates every single living being, is also spirit soul. The different material coverings, and bodies, are simply "coats" of clay which are covering the unchanging spirit soul.

Notice that the *I* which you are, is something which is **USING** the mind, but it is ALWAYS distinct from the mind.

Take the phrase: "I changed my mind". I'm willing to bet you have said this or heard this many times. But if you analyze it, what the phrase is saying, is that the *I* is an unchanging point, and that which is changing, is the *mind*. Therefore the *I* that we are, is not the mind, nor is it the body which houses the brain which gives rise to the mind. Who we are is much deeper than our external coverings and metaphysical minds.

Just "believing" in God is nonsensical. Of course one must "believe" something in order to progress towards knowledge of that thing, but the average "theist", has no knowledge of spirituality. They remain mired in what their mind "believes", and "thinks", and therefore they stay trapped within their minds and do not make the transition from belief in God into knowledge of Him.

Peace