why a GOD didn't destroy the D/evil....

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#25
I don't believe in Noah, or a flood commissioned by God to purify the earth - Just pointing out the obvious error in Mercediez post.

I wouldn't however discount the flood itself. I know that in North America during the postglacial period massive ice sheets melted forming immense lakes that dissapeared, geologically speaking, in the twinkle of an eye. This consists with the "earth diver" story of first nations people. Water as far as the eye can see. For this to happen in Europe wouldn't suprise me. People would surely tell "stories" or "myths" to explain this phenomenen.

So a massive flood I can believe in, though it didn't cover all of earth.

Noah making a boat with 2 of each animal, not so much.
Of course, Jesus. I first read the thread, then read your reply and it slipped my mind that IT used a Bible reference at the end; "thou shall not... For some reason I read it and saw a moral/ethical claim, that being not to kill, which is why I questioned your use of the Bible. Because for a theist to base the "not kill" on ethics/moral alone, a bible reference to refute it would fail. But I was in error!

Great response, though.




MEXICANCONDOM.. chill, though. HahHahaha.
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#33
In all honesty, if it were something worth the time I might move forward with this. But I look at what was said and I feel I've already wasted time with you.
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#39
My winning is proportional to the time you deem so precious as to have wasted on me. The more you waste the bigger my winnings.

On a graph X is the amount of time you've wasted on me. While Y, the dependent variable, is the amount of winningness. The more X moves across the horizontal spectrum the larger my winning. And my winning is perpetual. Because even if you don't give in and respond to me, you will undoubtedly read this comment and have wasted more of that time that was so precious to you. Hence my winning via simple mathematical concept.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#40
My winning is proportional to the time you deem so precious as to have wasted on me. The more you waste the bigger my winnings.

On a graph X is the amount of time you've wasted on me. While Y, the dependent variable, is the amount of winningness. The more X moves across the horizontal spectrum the larger my winning. And my winning is perpetual. Because even if you don't give in and respond to me, you will undoubtedly read this comment and have wasted more of that time that was so precious to you. Hence my winning via simple mathematical concept.

Shit, you can't argue with solid mathematics.

LOL @ "winningness"